Original source · versioned page text
Geotech Report - Initial Findings
Attached to the e-mail Operation Works Application - OPW19/0266 - 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach - (EMAIL 2/3) - Site Based Stormwater Management Plan, Acid Sulphate Soil & Groundwater Management Plan.
Essence of Peregian
215-219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
Project No. 007-160A,
27 April 2010
It is expected that some variability in material properties will occur across the site, however it is considered
that they should generally be within the range noted. Despite this variability, it would be generally expected
that the ‘higher’ modulus values are more likely to be applicable for short-term, transient loads (e.g. wheel
loads) whilst the ‘lower’ modulus values are more likely to apply to long-term loads.
5.7 Retaining Walls
Where sands are retained, non anchored retaining wall pressures could be based on the lateral earth
pressure coefficients given in Table 8, where a horizontal ground surface is retained in conjunction with a
triangular pressure distribution, provided the excavation is not surcharged by adjacent buildings/services and
some movement tolerance exists.
Table 8: Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients
Unit Lateral Earth Pressure
Material Strength Weight Coefficient (K)
3
(t/m ) Cantilever Propped
very loose to loose 1.8 0.40 0.60
Sand/Silty Sand/Indurated Sand medium dense 2.0 0.30 0.50
dense/weakly cemented 2.1 0.25 0.40
Where retaining walls are located on (or close behind) slopes, global stability of the overall slope must also
be checked (i.e. check for potential instability of materials occurring beneath the wall footing). Careful
consideration will also need to be given to wall and/or structure detailing, where settlement sensitive
structures/features are located ‘close’ to the top of ‘flexible’ retaining walls.
Prop loads for unsurcharged propped shoring walls could be designed based on a uniform pressure
distribution with depth, equivalent to 5H (kPa) where H is the depth of the excavation.
Even if a drainage system is installed behind retaining walls, it would still be prudent to allow for elevated
water pressures to act on the walls as elevated groundwater levels may occur due to blocked drainage
systems.
5.8 On-Ground Slabs and Pavements
Subgrade properties will vary across the site following earthworks, and detailed assessment/testing will be
required at the time of construction in order to confirm design values. Preliminary design of on-ground slabs
and pavements, cast over a natural soil, or controlled fill subgrade, could be based on the parameters
presented in Table 9. The values presented in Table 9 are based on the assumption that the subgrade is
prepared in accordance with Section 5.3.
Table 9: Subgrade Design Parameters
(1)
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Subgrade Type CBR (%)
(kPa/mm)
Silty Sand (natural or controlled fill) 5 – 10 30 – 50
Sand (natural or controlled fill) 8 – 10 40 – 50
(1)
For transient loading only
butlerpartners.com.au Page 14
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.