Council archive · source document
Appendix J - Code Assessment · RAL25/0004
be embellished with landscaping treatments to
enhance the visual amenity of the site.
Given the specific nature of this subdivision
proposal described above, the subdivision is
justified in terms of lot size, shape and will have no
detrimental amenity impacts on the surrounding
area.
PO6 No acceptable outcome provided Not applicable.
Development provides for irregular shaped lots to be created
only where:
(a) the creation of regular lots is impractical such as at a
curve in the road or because of topographical constraints;
(b) safe access and visual exposure to and from the site can
be provided, while not adversely impacting on the
functionality of the surrounding road network;
(c) it is desirable to avoid clearing of vegetation and the
fragmentation of habitat in ecologically important areas;
and
(d) the irregular lot is demonstrably suitable for its intended
purpose.
Lot Layout
Site Responsive Design AO7.1
PO7 If located in the Low density residential zone, Medium Complies.
Development provides for a lot layout and configuration of density residential zone, High density residential
roads and pathways that is responsive to:- zone, Tourist accommodation zone or Community As stated in Section 5.3 of the Planning Report, the
facilities zone and intended for a residential use, any site is identified as comprising Flood and Inundation
(a) the setting of the site within an urban or non-urban new lot is located outside the modelled flood level of Extent in accordance with Council’s Flood Hazard
context; the 1% AEP (1:100 year ARI) water surface levels or Overlay. However, this hazard area only encroaches
where not modelled, above the highest known flood into the north-eastern extremity of the site and has
(b) any natural environmental values present on, or adjoining level. no impact on the purpose of the subdivision. A bio-
the site;
retention basin will be provided in this small flood
(c) any natural hazards affecting the site or adjoining land affected area (see Appendix C & E for details).
such that the number of properties or persons at risk is Notably a Flood Hazard Assessment of the Lake
not increased; Macdonald Drive – Dianella Court Intersection was
(d) the terrain of the land, minimising the need for recently prepared for Noosa Shire Council by Hydra
earthworks; Logic. This Report found (Appendix I):
(e) any places of cultural heritage significance or character
areas present on, or adjoining the site; and ‘Detailed flood modelling of the catchment and
subject intersection has demonstrated the capacity
of the existing culverts provides 10% AEP design
flood immunity to the intersection. For larger and
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix J - Code Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 430 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.