Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

Meeting papers

of 478

Original PDF page 336, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING                                                              14 AUGUST 2023


 Evaluation Criteria                                                            Weighting (%)
 Price                                                                                    35%
 Methodology                                                                              25%
 Experience and Technical Capability                                                      20%
 Quality Management Systems                                                                5%
 Health and Safety Management Systems                                                      5%
 Environment and Sustainability                                                            5%
 Contribution to Local Economy                                                             5%

The evaluation was conducted by the Evaluation Panel consisting of the following members of
staff:

  Name                   Position (Title)
  Julie Calvert          Contract Administrator (Contractor - Reconstruction Works)
  Stuart Head            Contractor (Reconstruction Works)
  Nic Jones              NorthLane Consulting Engineers - Engineering Consultant
  Lindsay Egeskov        Infrastructure Delivery Project Officer
  Michael Balestra       Contract & Projects Superintendent
  Daniel Clarke          Workplace Health & Safety Adviser
  Camille Oliver         Principal Environment Officer – Environment Planning (Land)
  Anne Nolan             Project Officer - Carbon Reduction
Each member of the Evaluation Panel read and declared that they understood and accepted the
probity requirements, which includes a declaration of conflicts of interest and confidentiality.
The tender evaluation panel completed the evaluation process and considered SGQ Pty Ltd to
provide a better value for money solution. The evaluation panel identified that they were
favourable in the following areas:
   • Scored highest for non-price criteria and highest for combined price and non-price criteria;
   •   The offer of $4,874,066.00 (excluding GST) is within 3.4% of the median price of all the offers;
   •   Demonstrated key personnel and subcontractors with acceptable experience in similar
       projects;
   •   Proposed methodology demonstrated an understanding of the scope and the impact to
       community;
   •   Demonstrated acceptable understanding and application of approach to environment,
       sustainability and quality;
   •   Offered an acceptable level of contribution to the local economy;
   •   After further clarification during the post tender period, provided full compliance of tender
       requirements with no departures of the intended contract.
Attachment 1 – Evaluation Spreadsheet presents the evaluation outcome of the conforming
submissions against the above criteria.

4. Next Steps
Award contract award to SGQ Pty Ltd a value of $4,874,066.00 (excluding GST), which is funded
by QRA grant.

Link to Corporate Plan

Theme No. 2. - Liveability

Liveability encompasses housing, facilities and services, transport, health and wellbeing to enable




                                                                                                Page 336 of 476

Log in to download the original (b1337d84ed.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.