Council archive · source document
Development Assessment Report · MCU15/0122
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0122 Development Application - Report, Economic Needs & Traffic reports Email 2 of 5.
KHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS – 15180 December 2015
metal contaminants by:
a) neutralising existing acidity and preventing
the generation of acid and metal
contaminants, and
b) preventing the release of surface or
groundwater flows containing acid and metal
contaminants into the environment.
NATURAL HAZARDS STATE INTEREST
Assessment Criteria Comment
(1) avoids natural hazard areas or mitigates the Complies
risks of the natural hazard to an acceptable or A very small portion of the site’s north western
tolerable level, and corner is identified as an erosion prone area. The
site is within an existing urban area, has previously
been developed and there are no signs of previous
erosion. Given the above it is not considered that
there is any actual risk of erosion to the site. No
other natural hazard areas are identified as
affecting the site. Development will be undertaken
in accordance with detailed engineering and
building certification.
(2) supports, and does not unduly burden, disaster Complies
management response or recovery capacity and As above it is not considered that there is any
capabilities, and actual risk to the site or proposed development
(3) directly, indirectly and cumulatively avoids an relating to natural hazards.
increase in the severity of the natural hazard and
the potential for damage on the site or to other
properties, and
(4) avoids risks to public safety and the
environment from the location of hazardous
materials and the release of these materials as a
result of a natural hazard, and
(5) maintains or enhances natural processes and
the protective function of landforms and
vegetation that can mitigate risks associated with
the natural hazard, and
(6) is not located in an erosion prone area within a Complies
coastal management district unless: As above it is not considered that there is any
a) it cannot feasibly be located elsewhere, and actual risk to the site or proposed development
b) is coastal-dependent development, or relating to erosion.
temporary, readily relocatable or able-to-be-
abandoned development, and
(7) that is the redevelopment of existing
permanent buildings or structures, is located
outside an erosion-prone area or, where this is not
feasible, redevelopment:
a) is located:
i. as far landward from the seaward property
boundary as possible, or
ii. landward of the seaward alignment of the
neighbouring buildings, and
b) provides space seaward of the development
within the premises to allow for the future
construction of erosion control structures,
such as a seawall, and
(8) proposes to undertake coastal protection work
(excluding beach nourishment) only as a last resort
Development Assessment Report Page 13 of 34
Material Change of Use for Medical Centre and Café
52-58 Goodchap Street & 3-7 Val Crescent, Noosaville
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Assessment Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.6 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.