Original source · versioned page text
Approved Plans - MCU21/0221
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn 4.0 SETBACKS
The site assessment undertaken above has concluded that the proposed dwelling is to be located within
a High Potential Bushfire Intensity area (refer to Local Hazard Map presented as Figure 1). Therefore,
sufficient setbacks from hazardous vegetation should be implemented to reduce the risk of possible
uncontrolled wildfire events to the dwelling.
There are no specific setback criteria for a Material Change of Use development application under the
Noosa Plan Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code or the SPP Assessment Benchmarks. Assessment Benchmark 4
of the State Planning Policy – state interest guidance material states: Development supports, and does
not hinder, disaster management response or recovery capacity or capabilities. Where reconfiguring a lot
creating lots of greater than 2000 square metres, to ensure emergency access and operational space for
firefighters the subdivision layout results in lots that are sited so that they are separated from the closest
edge to the adjacent medium, high or very high potential bushfire intensity area by a distance that
achieves a radiant heat flux level of 29 kilowatt per square metre or less at:
1. The building envelope, if identified at RaL stage, or
2. Where a building envelope is not identified, at all the lot boundaries.
Compliance with Assessment Benchmark 4 can be attained where proposed dwellings are sufficiently
separated from the nearby forest hazard so that a radiant heat flux level at any point on the building does
not exceed 29 kW/m². The setback must be maintained as a dedicated Asset Protection Zone which
comprises only low threat vegetation, such as maintained lawns and cultivated gardens or are designed
to ensure a potential available fuel load is maintained at less than 8 tonnes/hectare in aggregate and with
a fuel structure that remains discontinuous.
Whilst it is acknowledged that the application is not for a reconfiguration of a Lot development approval,
it is considered that the 29kW/m2 minimum separation prescribed in Assessment Benchmark 4 is a
suitable minimum setback to be applied to the proposed dwelling. The separation required to achieve
<29kW/m2 radiant heat flux is equivalent to a BAL 29 construction standard under AS3959:2018.
4.1 SETBACK CALCULATIONS
Modelling has been undertaken to determine the setback distance required for the dwelling to achieve
the recommended 29kW/m2 separation. The models used comprise industry standard bushfire equations
using the FLAMESOL computer model. The FLAMESOL Minimum Distance calculator has been used and
comprises an AS3959 Method 2 based calculator which can determine a suite of bushfire behaviour
variables including the minimum distances required to achieve a range of different radiant heat level
exposures. The quantitative modelling output has been used to identify the setback requirements to
achieve the recommended <29 kW/m² radiant heat flux setback and achieve a BAL 29 construction
standard under AS3959. The modelling output is shown in Plate 8 and summarised in Table 2.
October 2021 BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT Page: 14
797 Ringtail Creek Road, Pomona
Document Set ID: 21731677
Version: 1, Version Date: 14/12/2021
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.