Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-10-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

of 128

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (21.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                10 OCTOBER 2017


Uses and Agricultural Uses are listed as inconsistent impact assessable development as they are
considered incompatible with surrounding residential development.




                          No.
                          101


                        No. 105




                                       Figure 2 – Zoning Plan

The application does not seek approval for uses consistent with the zoning of the land and rather
proposes to expand on the range of business uses able to operate from the site. The proposed
industrial business relies on a broad definition allowing a range of Service Industry uses to
operate from the site and the proposed Garden and Lifestyle Centre is a new use as a whole with
no connection to any existing use rights. Overtime it is considered that sites with non-conforming
uses, such as this one will be redeveloped in line with the zoning intent. The proposed
commercial uses are more appropriately located in the designated business or industrial areas.
Approval is also sought for a larger 2 storey commercial building with gross floor area of 710m2.
Where the existing commercial building is single storey with a floor area of 444m 2. This
represents an additional gross floor area of 266m2 intended for business use. The applicant
suggests that there is no increase in gross floor area over the land as the existing shed located in
the north-eastern corner and over the common boundary of Lot 101 and 105 has historically
been used in association with the existing use rights. Council does not have any records to
suggest either of the buildings were included in the planning approval (TPC 658) over the site,
however based on limited information on the file there is evidence which suggests the shed in the
north-eastern corner of the site was permitted to be used for storage purposes only in association
with the approved uses. There are no other records of the shed located over the common
boundary of Lot 101 and 105.
The application does offer various improvements to the site when viewed from Eumundi Noosa
Road and provides an improved interface between adjoining residential uses. The proposed


                                                                                   Page 69 of 128
Log in to download the original file

2017-10-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda(PDF, 21MB).pdf · 21.6 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.