Maritime Safety Queensland Recreational Boating Facilities Demand Forecast Study 2022
See the votes on this matter →
What was decided?
The minuted decision sequence
No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.
1Committee RecommendationCarried
Moved: Frank Wilkie · Seconded: Joe Jurisevic
That Services & Organisation Committee Agenda Item 5.1 be referred to the General Committee meeting due to the significance of the issue.
Carried Unanimously.
Official minutes · section 1
Read complete item-specific minutes
| Committee Recommendation |
| Moved: | Cr Frank Wilkie |
| Seconded: | Cr Joe Jurisevic |
That Services & Organisation Committee Agenda Item 5.1 be referred to the General Committee meeting due to the significance of the issue. |
Carried Unanimously. |
This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.
What was said?
Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV
These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.
Sure. Thank you, this is a joint report, both with environment and infrastructure. The report provides an overview of the recreational boating facilities demand forecast study 2022, 2022, which was commissioned by the Maritime Safety Queensland, a branch of TMR. The study identifies the latent demands for boat launching facilities on the Noosa River and recommends a number of priorities. Study looks at an increasing number of boat ramps and parking. However, there's a concern that it doesn't take the regional approach and there's lack of consideration of contemporary parking and river management demands and the increase of capacity on the river, what these impacts will be. The study identifies seven priority projects in a detailed assessment and recommendations are included which Council has developed in consultation with workshops and with the Councillors. Six projects have merit and should have further consideration and require an extensive redesign due to the quality of the impacts on the river and it's recommended that the priority one project Chaplin Park be rejected due to its inconsistent use with the foreshore land it management plan and the impacts on the park lands and the community expectations Amy did you want to add anything as a summary thank you.
Amelia Lorentson1:43There are no presentations and no deputations. So let's move to item five, reports for consideration in the committee. Firstly, item one, Maritime Safety Queensland recreational facilities demand forecast study 2022. Can I ask, are there any conflicts of interest? No? Welcome to the desk, Craig and Dean. Can you please firstly give us a summary or overview of the report?
1 suggested discussion start time
- 144.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Approximate discussion link. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.