Nick Cooke
See the votes on this matter →
What was decided?
The minuted decision sequence
No separately labelled carried Council Resolution has been identified here. Read each formal event and the complete item minutes; a lost motion is not necessarily the final outcome.
Read complete item-specific minutes
QUESTION 1
Why are new actions, like "Accommodation options for visitors" and "Investigate future commercial and industrial land for Pomona," being added to the final Place Plan in response to a single submission, such as one calling for "a world class 4 or 5-star enviro-resort similar to Kingfisher Bay Resort on K’gari," when those new actions haven't gone through the first two rounds of consultation and thus haven't gone through the community prioritisation and scrutiny phase?
Response provided by Kim Rawlings Director Strategy and Environment
As part of the community engagement council made a commitment to capture all suggested actions from the community throughout the process. Those actions that did not get identified as priority actions in the main sections of the Plan have been captured in Appendix B. These additional actions have been included in Appendix B. When the Place plan is to be reviewed all these Actions in appendix B will be presented back to the community to be re-tested and then be prioritised. These additional actions are not included in Part B as priority actions.
QUESTION 2
Why is the 'Kin Kin Quarry' not explicitly identified or mentioned in the Place Plan, despite staff comments in Attachment 2, which were made in response to significant community feedback that the Plan had failed to capture the quarry situation impacting Pomona, and despite stating the Plan would be amended to "include references to Kin Kin Quarry"?
Response provided by Kim Rawlings Director Strategy and Environment
Why are new actions, like "Accommodation options for visitors" and "Investigate future commercial and industrial land for Pomona," being added to the final Place Plan in response to a single submission, such as one calling for "a world class 4 or 5-star enviro-resort similar to Kingfisher Bay Resort on K’gari," when those new actions haven't gone through the first two rounds of consultation and thus haven't gone through the community prioritisation and scrutiny phase?
Response provided by Kim Rawlings Director Strategy and Environment
As part of the community engagement council made a commitment to capture all suggested actions from the community throughout the process. Those actions that did not get identified as priority actions in the main sections of the Plan have been captured in Appendix B. These additional actions have been included in Appendix B. When the Place plan is to be reviewed all these Actions in appendix B will be presented back to the community to be re-tested and then be prioritised. These additional actions are not included in Part B as priority actions.
QUESTION 2
Why is the 'Kin Kin Quarry' not explicitly identified or mentioned in the Place Plan, despite staff comments in Attachment 2, which were made in response to significant community feedback that the Plan had failed to capture the quarry situation impacting Pomona, and despite stating the Plan would be amended to "include references to Kin Kin Quarry"?
Response provided by Kim Rawlings Director Strategy and Environment
The Plan has been amended to reflect heavy vehicle movements including quarry trucks. Pages 12, 27 and 28 have references to this issue.
This summary follows this item’s minutes. The established voting totals use their existing method while differences are checked against the full records.
What was said?
Named discussion on NoosaWatch TV
These actual transcript passages match the item’s wording. The start and end of the item’s discussion are not yet confirmed; these excerpts are not measured item airtime or exact decision moments.
Frank Wilkie17:05Thank you. The next application is from Nick Cooke. Mr Cooke is not in attendance but has requested the CEO read out his questions which will be answered by Kim Rawlings, Director Strategy and Environment.
Larry Sengstock17:22
Okay from Mr. Nick Cooke. Question one. Why are new actions like accommodation options for visitors and investigate future commercial and industrial land for Pomona being added to the final place plan in response to a single submission such as one calling-class world four or five star enviro resort similar to kingfisher bay resort on K’gari when those new actions haven't gone through the first two rounds of consultation and thus haven't gone through the community prioritisation and scrutiny phase.
1 suggested discussion start time
- 1035.0 seconds on the council source timeline · Approximate discussion link. The end of the discussion is not yet confirmed.