General Committee Meeting, 13 April 2026
Date: Monday, 13 April 2026 at 12:30PM
Location: Noosa Shire Council Chambers , 9 Pelican Street , Tewantin , QLD 4565 , Australia
Organiser: Noosa Shire Council
Duration: 02:19:28
Synopsis: Tourism Noosa deed not adopted, Funding uncertainty, KPIs and governance debated, Amendment allowing funding review passed, Force majeure clause flagged, Pool and gym contracts awarded.
Meeting Attendees
Committee Members
Brian Stockwell Karen Finzel Amelia Lorentson Jessica Phillips Tom Wegener Frank Wilkie Nicola Wilson Executive Officers
Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock Director Community Services Kerri Contini Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Director Strategy And Environment Kim Rawlings Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh Acting Director Development & Regulation Patrick Murphy AI-Generated Meeting Insight
Key Decisions & Discussions Brian Stockwell oversaw adoption of a rotating chair schedule for General Committee meetings, confirming Standing Orders section 36.2 covers absences (Item 8.1; 02:12–03:42). Kim Rawlings presented the Tourism Noosa Funding & Performance Deed 2026–2029: $2m p.a., CPI capped at 3.5% from year 2, three instalments with a performance-based adjustment up to $350k; deed aligns with the Destination Management Plan (DMP) and introduces ranked KPIs and a points system (Item 8.2; 04:53–08:43). Frank Wilkie confirmed external legal review and procurement input supported structure/compliance; feedback focused on drafting/KPI measurability rather than content (07:33–08:43; Item 8.2). Nicola Wilson successfully moved Amendment No.1 to clause 4.3 so funding may be reviewed/adjusted if Tourism Noosa (TN) gains a substantial, sustainable alternative source (e.g., a user-pays visitor/bed tax), with proportionality and written agreement (Carried; Item 8.2). Amelia Lorentson proposed adding a clause for review on “material external shock” to visitor economy; after legal input indicating a force majeure-style clause would be more appropriate, she withdrew to redraft for Ordinary Meeting (25:59–27:50; Item 8.2). Brian Stockwell ’s substantive motion to approve the Deed (as amended by clause 4.3) was lost 3–4 (Item 8.2; 54:47–59:31). Brian Stockwell then moved to defer Item 8.2 to the 16 April Ordinary Meeting; the deferral motion was lost (Item 8.2; 59:31–01:24:32). Amelia Lorentson moved an interim funding/continuity motion paired with a full review of governance/funding/consultation; it was lost 2–5 (Item 8.2; 01:24:49–01:33:07). Nicola Wilson secured the Committee Recommendation: Council notes the report and does not adopt the proposed Deed in its current form (Carried 6–1; Item 8.2; 01:34:09–01:42:24). Council awarded CN26032 Noosa Aquatic Centre 50m pool filtration upgrade to CMP Corp Pty Ltd for $1,210,780.40 (GST excl), with CEO delegated to administer/variations (Item 9.1; 01:57:41–01:59:59). Council awarded CN25048 Cooroy Gymnasium Upgrade & Extension to Murphy Builders QLD Pty Ltd, Design & Construct, total $3,692,575.40 (GST excl), incl. lump sum, removal of value-management options, and provisional sum; CEO delegated to administer/variations (Item 9.2; 02:15:21–02:18:51). Contentious / Transparency Matters Amelia Lorentson and Jessica Phillips questioned whether a May 2025 resolution requiring consultation with industry stakeholders and residents before future funding decisions had been met; CEO took on notice (10:57–11:39; Item 8.2). Jessica Phillips argued KPIs lack SMART outcomes and risk paying $1.65m even if core outcomes underperform; critiqued governance loop measuring “alignment” not “outcomes” (31:37–33:27; Item 8.2). Brian Stockwell directed withdrawal of an accusation of “stealth,” ruling it an allegation of impropriety; maintained relevance constraints on debate (29:36–29:47; Item 8.2). Standing Orders s31 dispute: whether a procedural deferral motion could be moved post-vote; Chair ruled no decision existed on the books and allowed it; motion ultimately lost (01:18:07–01:24:32; Item 8.2). Karen Finzel floated shortening the deed term to one year for certainty in a volatile environment; CEO cautioned it would undermine the three-year certainty resolved in Dec 2025 and be impractical (49:43–54:07; Item 8.2). Public sentiment from the DMP Community Insights was cited by Jessica Phillips as favouring review/reduction of public tourism marketing spend; others countered the DMP and deed process had robust legal/procurement oversight (30:02–31:18; 45:51–49:40; Item 8.2). Legal / Risk External/Internal Legal Review confirmed deed structure/compliance and KPI measurability; procurement confirmed alignment with Local Government framework/principles (07:33–08:43; Item 8.2). Jessica Phillips asserted a bed tax is not currently lawful for QLD local governments under the Local Government Act 2009; Amendment No.1 retained a generic adjustment clause but example remained in minutes wording (18:26–20:36; Item 8.2). Force majeure concept raised by legal counsel as a better mechanism than bespoke “external shock” wording; to be drafted for potential inclusion at Ordinary (25:59–27:50; Item 8.2). Confidentiality : Council lawfully closed meetings under Local Government Regulation 2012 s254J(3)(g) to discuss contract negotiations for Items 9.1 and 9.2, reopening to decide and disclose awards (9.1, 9.2 minutes; 01:43:23–01:59:59; 02:00:15–02:15:21). Procurement Delegations : Both contract awards delegated administration/variations to CEO, preserving commercial agility while decisions were made in open session (Items 9.1, 9.2). Funding Certainty Risk : Loss of the deed in current form creates interim uncertainty for TN services; attempts to defer or adopt interim funding failed at Committee, leaving resolution for the Ordinary Meeting (59:31–01:35:52; Item 8.2). Conflicts of Interest Jessica Phillips declared a prescribed conflict for CN25048 (Cooroy Gymnasium) due to her paid role with Cooroy Gymnastics Club; she left for debate/vote, consistent with Local Government Act 2009, Ch 5B (02:00:17–02:00:53; Item 9.2). Tourism Noosa Funding Framework & KPIs Funding mechanics : $2m p.a., CPI cap 3.5% from year 2, three instalments with a mid-year performance adjustment up to $350k per points-ranked KPIs (Item 8.2; 04:53–08:43). Governance intent : Deed to embed DMP priorities (destination stewardship, sustainability, behaviour change) with clarified roles between Council and TN (Item 8.2; 04:53–07:29). Critiques : Councillors raised that many “KPIs” were activity deliverables lacking numeric outcome targets, risking weak accountability; staff emphasized annual KPI review and legal vetting for measurability (31:37–33:27; 07:33–08:43; Item 8.2). Revenue adjustment : Clause 4.3 now permits proportionate funding adjustment if TN secures substantial sustainable alternative funding, with written agreement (Amendment No.1 Carried; Item 8.2). Term/certainty tension : Push to shorten to one year for flexibility rejected at this stage due to prior three-year intent and operational certainty requirements (49:43–54:07; Item 8.2).
Official Meeting Minutes
MINUTES General Committee Meeting Monday, 13 April 2026 12:30 PM Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin Committee: Crs Brian Stockwell (Chair), Karen Finzel, Amelia Lorentson, Jessica Phillips, Tom Wegener, Frank Wilkie, Nicola Wilson “Noosa Shire – different by nature” GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 1 DECLARATION OF OPENING The meeting was declared open at 12.30pm. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Noosa Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters of the Noosa area, the Kabi Kabi people, and pays respect to their Elders, past, present and emerging. 3 ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Cr Brian Stockwell (Chair) Cr Karen Finzel Cr Amelia Lorentson Cr Jessica Phillips Cr Tom Wegener Cr Frank Wilkie Cr Nicola Wilson EXECUTIVE Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock Director Community Services Kerri Contini Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Director Strategy and Environment Kim Rawlings Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh Acting Director Development & Regulation Patrick Murphy APOLOGIES Nil. 4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.1 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING DATED 16 MARCH 2026 Committee Resolution Moved: Cr Frank Wilkie Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the Minutes of the General Committee Meeting held on 16 March 2026 be received and confirmed. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 5. PRESENTATIONS Nil. 6. DEPUTATIONS Nil. GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 7 ITEMS REFERRED FROM COMMITTEES Nil. 8 REPORTS DIRECT TO GENERAL COMMITTEE 8.1 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING - SCHEDULE OF CHAIRPERSON Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Frank Wilkie Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That Council A. Note the report by the Executive Officer to the General Committee dated 13 April 2026 regarding the General Committee Meeting - Schedule of Chairperson; and B. Adopt the Schedule of Chairperson for the General Committee Meeting as provided in the Report, for the period of 1 May 2026 to 28 February 2028. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 8.2 TOURISM NOOSA FUNDING AND PERFORMANCE DEED 2026–2029 Motion Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council: A. Approve the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029 with Tourism Noosa Ltd for a term of three (3) years, commencing 1 July 2026 and ending 30 June 2029, for funding of $2,000,000 per annum (ex GST), with CPI indexation applied from the second year of the Term, capped at a maximum of 3.5% per annum, subject to the terms and conditions of the Funding Deed as per Attachment 1. B. Note that the funding will be paid in three instalments, with the second instalment subject to a performance-based adjustment of up to $350,000, based on Council’s assessment of KPIs and Target Metrics achievement under the Annual Outcome Report and having regard to the KPI priority rankings and points-based calculation methodology set out in Schedule 2 to the Deed. C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to: 1. Finalise and execute the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029, including any minor or administrative amendments if required following Council decision; and 2. Administer the Funding Deed in accordance with its terms. Amendment No.1 Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Item A. 1. be added to read: 1. Clause 4.3 be amended as follows: 4.3 The Parties may review and adjust the Funding (whether an increase or decrease) if an external event occurs that results in TN receiving a substantial sustainable alternative source GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 of funding., regardless of whether such event was anticipated at the commencement of the Term. An example of such an external event includes, without limitation: (a) A User Pays Visitor Tax or equivalent (i.e. a bed tax) is implemented. Any adjustment to the Funding under this clause must be reasonably proportionate to the financial impact of the alternative funding source and must be agreed in writing by the Parties. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Amendment No. 2 Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded Cr Nicola Wilson That Item A. 2. be added to read: 2. That Clause 4 be amended to include a new provision requiring that the Funding Deed and associated deliverables may be reviewed and adjusted where a material external shock occurs that significantly impacts the visitor economy, including but not limited to sustained increases in fuel costs, significant changes to aviation capacity or routes, natural disasters, or a sustained downturn in tourism demand. Any such review must allow Council and the parties to jointly consider whether funding levels, priorities, KPIs, or delivery expectations require adjustment to ensure the agreement remains realistic, fair, and aligned with prevailing economic, aviation, and market conditions, and continues to deliver value for money and effective outcomes under changed circumstances. Amendment No. 2 was withdrawn by Cr Lorentson with agreeance of the Seconder and full Council. Motion Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council: A. Approve the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029 with Tourism Noosa Ltd for a term of three (3) years, commencing 1 July 2026 and ending 30 June 2029, for funding of $2,000,000 per annum (ex GST), with CPI indexation applied from the second year of the Term, capped at a maximum of 3.5% per annum, subject to the terms and conditions of the Funding Deed as per Attachment 1 with the following amendment: 1. Clause 4.3 be amended as follows: 4.3 The Parties may review and adjust the Funding (whether an increase or decrease) if an external event occurs that results in TN receiving a substantial sustainable alternative source of funding., regardless of whether such event was anticipated at the commencement of the Term. An example of such an external event includes, without limitation: (a) A User Pays Visitor Tax or equivalent (i.e. a bed tax) is implemented. Any adjustment to the Funding under this clause must be reasonably proportionate to the financial impact of the alternative funding source and must be agreed in writing by the Parties. B. Note that the funding will be paid in three instalments, with the second instalment subject to a performance-based adjustment of up to $350,000, based on Council’s assessment of KPIs and Target Metrics achievement under the Annual Outcome Report and having GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 regard to the KPI priority rankings and points-based calculation methodology set out in Schedule 2 to the Deed. C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to: 1. Finalise and execute the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026– 2029, including any minor or administrative amendments if required following Council decision; and 2. Administer the Funding Deed in accordance with its terms. Lost. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson The meeting adjourned at 1.32pm The meeting resumed at 1.47pm Procedural Motion Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Frank Wilkie That General Committee Agenda Item 8.2 be deferred to the Ordinary Meeting dated 16 April 2026 for further consideration. Lost. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Against: Wilson Motion Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council A. Note the report regarding the proposed funding arrangement with Tourism Noosa; B. Does not adopt the proposed Deed in its current form; C. Request that the Chief Executive Officer prepare an interim funding arrangement for Tourism Noosa to ensure continuity of core destination marketing services; and D. Note that the intent of this Resolution is to ensure continuity of tourism promotion services while Council undertakes a full review of governance, funding arrangements and community consultation. Lost. For: Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Council: A. Note the report regarding the proposed funding arrangement with Tourism Noosa; B. Does not adopt the proposed Deed in its current form. Carried. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: Cr Brian Stockwell 9 CONFIDENTIAL SESSION 9.1 CONFIDENTIAL - CONTRACT AWARD - CONTRACT NO. CN26032 - NOOSA AQUATIC CENTRE 50M POOL WATER TREATMENT PLANT FILTRATION UPGRADE WORKS CLOSURE OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Committee Resolution Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Frank Wilkie That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to be made by Council and in particular, the potential commercial negotiations in relation to the contracts for Item 9.1. CONFIDENTIAL - CONTRACT AWARD - CONTRACT NO. CN26032 - NOOSA AQUATIC CENTRE 50M POOL WATER TREATMENT PLANT FILTRATION UPGRADE WORKS. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None REOPENING OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Committee Resolution Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the meeting be re-opened to the public. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That Council A. Note the report by the Sport and Active Lifestyles Manager to the General Committee dated 13 April 2026 regarding the outcome of the tender process for Noosa Aquatic Centre 50M Pool Water Treatment Plant Filtration Upgrade Works; B. Award Contract No. CN26032 for Noosa Aquatic Centre 50M Pool Water Treatment Plant Filtration Upgrade Works to CMP Corp Pty Ltd under a lump sum contract for a total contract value of $1,210,780.40 (GST Excl); and C. Delegate to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate, finalise, execute and do all things necessary to administer and vary the contract on behalf of Council. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 9.2 CONFIDENTIAL - CONTRACT AWARD REPORT – CONTRACT NO. CN25048 – COOROY GYMNASIUM UPGRADE AND EXTENSION Cr Jessica Phillips "In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009 - I inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to Item 9.2 - CONFIDENTIAL - CONTRACT AWARD REPORT – CONTRACT NO. CN25048 – COOROY GYMNASIUM UPGRADE AND EXTENSION on this agenda because I am working 10 hours per week as the General Manager and Coach of the Cooroy Gymnastics Club. As a result of my conflict of interest, I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on.". Cr Phillips left the meeting. CLOSURE OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Committee Resolution Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to be made by Council and in particular, the potential commercial negotiations in relation to that contract for Item 9.2. CONFIDENTIAL - CONTRACT AWARD REPORT – CONTRACT NO. CN25048 – COOROY GYMNASIUM UPGRADE AND EXTENSION. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Cr Phillips was not present for the vote due to her conflict of interest declaration. GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 13 APRIL 2026 REOPENING OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Committee Resolution Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That the meeting be re-opened to the public. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Cr Phillips was not present for the vote due to her conflict of interest declaration. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That Council A. Note the report by the Project Manager and Graduate Engineer to the General Committee Meeting dated 13 April 2026; B. Award Contract No. CN25048 for Cooroy Gymnasium Upgrade and Extension to Murphy Builders QLD Pty Ltd under a lump sum Design & Construct contract for an estimated total contract value of $3,692,575.40 (GST Excl) as follows: 1. The Lump Sum amount of $3,218,467.73 2. The Provision of additional scope for the removal of Value Management options for an amount of $251,607.67; 3. A Provisional Item sum amount of $222,500.00; and C. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate, finalise, execute and do all the things necessary to administer and vary the contract on behalf of Council. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Frank Wilkie, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Cr Phillips was not present for the vote due to her conflict of interest declaration. Cr Phillips returned to the meeting. 10 MEETING CLOSURE The meeting closed at 2.50pm.
Meeting Transcript
Brian Stockwell 00:00.020
We're speaking on Kabi Kabi country and we pay our respects to the thousands of years of leadership of the elders in the past, in the present and those emerging who are always keen to work with Council to look after and care for country. We don't have any apologies but we do have a set of minutes from last month's General Committee Meeting to move by Councillor Wilkie, Councillor Finzel, presuming there's no discussion. All in favour? That's unanimous. There's no presentation, no deputations, no matters referred from committee so we move on straight to section 8 and the first item in that section Jonci Wolff 01:08.482
On 19 March 2026 Council resolved to amend its meeting structure reducing formal meetings to one General Committee Meeting and one Ordinary Meeting effective on the 1st of May 2026. As part of the change to the meeting structure Council endorsed the implementation of a rotating schedule for the Chairperson the of the General Committee Meeting to provide all Councillors the opportunity to act as a Chairperson. Participation is not mandatory and rotations were assigned by random draw. This report before you presents the Schedule of Chairperson as agreed by Councillors for the period one countenance 1 May. 2026 to 28 February 2028 when the next local government election is anticipated to occur. It is therefore recommended note this report and adopt the Schedule of Chairperson before the General Committee Meeting as provided in the report for the period 1 May 2026 to 28 February 2028. thank you, Mr. good. Brian Stockwell 02:11.442
Councillors, we will be involved. Does anyone have any questions? Councillor Lorentson. Councillor Lorentson Amelia Lorentson 02:15.104
Just a question in terms of clarification. Are you happy that section 36.2 of the Standing Orders, which states if the Chairperson of a standing. Committee is absent or unavailable to preside, a Councillor chosen by the Councillors present will preside over the standing committee meeting. Are you happy that clause doesn't need to be stated as record part of this recommendation? My concern is John c's, for instance, idea of if I'm going to take holidays in 2028 and when that period happens, just do we need any clarity around that situation? In terms of lead? Of leave, absence, or illness, or are you confident that section 36.2 of the Standing Orders covers that situation? Jonci Wolff 03:15.539
Yeah, I'm very confident that section covers that point because it basically provides if a Chairperson is unavailable or absent, which obviously is very, very broad and can cover quite a few different scenarios, including private arrangements, so that section probably covers for their form of proxy as outlined, that all remaining Councillors present in the meeting can nominate a person as a proxy in that meeting. Amelia Lorentson 03:43.242
Thank you very much. Brian Stockwell 03:45.778
Any others? Would someone like to move? Frank Wilkie 03:47.693
I'm happy to move. Brian Stockwell 03:48.815
By Councillor Wilkie, seconded by Councillor Finzel. Yoke. Before pinto will be. Thank you. Frank Wilkie 03:54.393
As discussed last month, this change to the two meeting schedule is intended to be a more efficient form of decision making for the community and also this Council and the rotating Chair idea was something that was being been discussed and will give all Councillors an opportunity to Hone their skills of chairing in the more robust forum which is the General Committee. Brian Stockwell 04:22.311
Anyone else wish to speak? No? I'm presuming you don't want to argue with selkirk. I'll put the motion those in favour. That's unanimous. We then move on to the second item in section 8 which is the Tourism Noosa funding at Palmer steed 2026 to 2029 and we welcome Kim Rawlings, the Director Strategy and Environment to the Chair. Kim, if you can give us an overview please. Thanks Councillors and good afternoon. Kim Rawlings 04:57.296
Council report, it follows the Council meeting and decision in December, 18th of December, where Council adopted the Tourism Noosa Roadmap and endorsed what was known as option two to evolve Tourism Noosa to align with the Destination Management Plan. Also in December Council adopted its Destination Management Plan. So this report, sorry that resolution required the CEO to bring a report back to Council with the final terms for the multi-year funding deed and to ensure that there was procurement guidance and support of the development of that process. This report responds to that resolution and brings back to you for consideration the detailed Tourism Noosa funding and performance deed. The adopted DMP requires a shift towards destination stewardship, embedding community values, sustainability, behaviour change and measurable outcomes across the services that Tourism Noosa deliver including marketing, visitor services and industry capability. The funding deed as attached a fair effect to this shift. It preserves, seeks to preserve their service continuity but strengthens accountability, aligns programs and reporting to the DMP and clarifies roles and governance between Council and TN. The deed introduces ranked KPI framework supported by a points-based performance adjustment methodology enabling Council to assess performance against KPIs and importance of. The deed was developed through a joint Council and Tourism Noosa working group. It was guided by and reviewed by I don't think. Council's internal legal counsel. It also has undergone an independent external legal review and as per Council resolution Council procurement has advised on compliance with the local government framework and the principles. Um Councillors have been briefed on a number of occasions and received drafts and provided valuable input into the development of the process. So the report recommends the funding deed as attached for Council consideration with Tourism Noosa for a term of three years commencing on the 1st of July 2026 and ending on 30th of June 2029. There is provision for the CAPE KPIs to be reviewed on an annual basis and it seeks authorisation for the CEO to finalise and execute the deed and administer the deed in accordance with the group's terms. Brian Stockwell 07:30.082
Thank you. Do we have any questions? Councillor Wilkie. Frank Wilkie 07:34.049
Thank you for the report, Kim. Me tell us a bit more about the external legal review, what they were looking at and checking for? Kim Rawlings 07:42.231
Sure. We had, after the December meeting, we engaged with procurement immediately and said provide procurement all of the documentation. Procurement recommended um, a recommended a external legal firm to get involved. I can't think of the name but I've been working with him, doesn't matter. And they have been involved right through the process so they firstly reviewed the deed before the KPIs were developed and provided some great feedback which has all been incorporated. I think they did that maybe twice, possibly three times. And then as the KPIs were being developed will versions of those were sent also to the legal firm to see that they were measurable, that they, you know, aligned and feedback was also given from that perspective, noting that they didn't provide feedback really content, on more structure, alignment. More structure, alignment, drafting, those sorts of things in relation to the KPIs. Brian Stockwell 08:42.537
Thank you. Okay, any other questions? Councillor Lorentson? Amelia Lorentson 08:48.266
Lonnison can you confirm whether Council is legally committed to the three-year funding arrangement, is already legally committed, or is the funding still subject to Council endorsement of this report and the attached funding deed. Larry Sengstock 09:07.408
Well, I'm happy to answer that. My understanding is that we've agreed to a three-year funding agreement. This deed is pursuant to how that funding is. Allocated in terms of KPIs and/or over the term. So we are in December this year or last year we agreed a three-year funding agreement for clues and Noosa with the terms to be agreed and this is what the deed is for the four-year program. Brian Stockwell 09:43.060
Do you have a question Councillors? Amelia Lorentson 09:44.464
I've received different advice from governments on that. Brian Stockwell 09:52.287
So you haven't got a question? Amelia Lorentson 09:54.947
Can I rephrase the question? Can we perhaps on notice, can you please come back to me with that? Sure, happy to come back on that. My information differs as Unidentified Speaker 10:06.201
Well thank you very much. To understand it. Brian Stockwell 10:14.443
Thank you. Any other questions, Kim? Jessica Phillips 10:17.598
I have a question, just, okay I can ask it. I wasn't here on the 18th of December at the Ordinary Meeting. I had leave planned four months prior. Question to the CEO around that coming to the December meeting. Could you maybe explain to me, because I felt like I would have really liked to have been able to. So, Councillor, I'm not going to allow the question. It doesn't relate to the matter in front of us. Relates to history. Okay. Can I rephrase the question? Brian Stockwell 10:51.284
If it relates to this report and what we're dealing with today. Thanks. Councillor Lorentson? Amelia Lorentson 10:56.552
I have a few questions that were sent to me by residents. One was in reference to the Council resolution in 2025, which required. Consultation with industry stakeholders and residents. Before any future funding decisions. My question is how does the proposed. Three by two million dollar per annum funding comply with that resolution? Brian Stockwell 11:26.928
Who are you taking for the CEO? Larry Sengstock 11:30.627
I'm going to have to take that question on notice, I'm aware of that. Amelia Lorentson 11:35.747
It's part of the report. I'll just pull out the report. Brian Stockwell 11:40.380
The CEO said he's taking it on notice. Amelia Lorentson 11:42.739
Other questions? Karen Finzel 11:48.609
Yeah, sure. Thank you for the report. Firstly, on page 3 of 12, TN is. Council's long-standing LTC. LTO and key delivery partner. I've raised this in the past around the funding. We've talked about evolving Noosa. Tourism Noosa. I feel like I haven't got an explicit answer in terms of. The question is. Tourism. NUSA Noosa continuing to operate as an LTO? Kim Rawlings 12:26.696
So Tourism Noosa is a local tourism organisation. Yes. In the hierarchy of tourism organisations, there is a regional tourism organisation which is Visit Sunshine Coast. Covers Sunshine Coast Council, Noosa Council and Gympie Council. And then peer then there are Local Tourism Organisations. Not all destinations have Local Tourism Organisations but destinations like ours that have a strong tourism industry do tend to have Local Tourism Organisations and that's what Tourism Noosa is. So in terms of structure and governance yes they are a local tourism organisation you know if you were asking whether they operate from an influence perspective have they definitely impact you know beyond a local tourism organisation but in terms of governance and structure and hierarchy they are LTO. Brian Stockwell 13:33.851
And then the question Councillor Phillips? Finzel? Karen Finzel 13:35.691
Yes certainly sorry it's on notice are you able to tell me the LTO's what sort of funding amounts do they receive? Kim Rawlings 13:48.184
So I don't have that at hand but Council have been provided that previously as part of the benchmarking for the Roadmap in December we provided that information to Council so happy to recirculate that but it does it varies you know most LTO's have a level of funding provided from their local Council local governments. LTOs LTO's do not tend to get state funding, state fund the RTO bodies so most LTO's get funding from their local governments and also their membership base but in terms of what each of them get we yeah there was a schedule and a benchmarking process done and provided to Council in December so happy to recirculate that yeah. Karen Finzel 14:40.040
Just from memory was that confidential or open to the public? Brian Stockwell 14:46.844
That's a great question Councillor Finzel. Can you take that on notice, it's not really related progress, to the matter in practice, it's related to history once again. I think there page. Was a version that we made public, but I'm happy to share that. Thank you. Any other questions? I'll move to staff recommendation. So Councillors we have agreed to enter into this agreement through the Roadmap process and the staff have actioned the motion. From December to produce a deed that has been negotiated both with Councillors and involvement of Councillors and with the relevant working group of Tourism Noosa. Deed does the deed reflect what was expected from the Roadmap and what was adopted as actions in the Destination Management Plan. It sets out the transition to an organisation that is a partner in delivering the Destination Management Plan with enhanced accountability measures, enhanced key performance indicators and a changed payment structure that overtly includes a payment in second and third year related to the satisfactory completion of the previous year's work. So in that regard it is the agreement before us is completely consistent with the adopted position of Council and therefore I urge your support. Thank you very much. Others wish to talk? Sure. If you'd like to read out what the change is. Nicola Wilson 16:53.521
Yeah, so clause 4.3 in the deed, and I assume you want to delete some of the content there. So it would just read as parties may review an adjustment funding, whether an increase or decrease. If an external grant event occurs at the end of the year, that results in the end receiving a sustainable alternative source of funding. Any adjustment to the funding under this clause must be reasonably proportionate to the financial impact of the alternative funding source and must be agreed writing for sake of that little heart. In writing by the parties to the same family or partner. Brian Stockwell 17:26.728
And we have a seconder. Councillor Phillips. Talk to your amendment please, Councillor Phillips. Nicola Wilson 17:35.570
This agreement is between Council and TN with a commitment to debugging TN for three years by general rights collected through differential rates on businesses. We've talked about how that applies to the general rights many times over this process. At this point we do not expect this to change. TN needs certainty and we need to be able to commit to using general rights to fund this agreement. If Council finds a new income source, it's not relevant to this agreement. TN finds a new income source, it's meeting its revenue diversification goal and of course we would have a discussion about that source if it happens. Having said that, we shouldn't reference a bed tax. It doesn't exist in Queensland. It is pre-empting a Council position that we haven't reached yet, or may never reach. If the source of income becomes so great that the TN isn't reliant on Council anymore, then both parties have the option to end the agreement. But we should not pre-empt the types of income that may occur to a third party, particularly when they are currently not illegal. As there is no Council position to refer to. Brian Stockwell 18:44.856
I was wishing to talk to the I Jessica Phillips 18:49.778
Will just keep it simple, I'm happy to support the amendment. Bed tax is not currently lawful for local government in the plan to implement, either directly or indirectly and the Local Government Act does not expressly authorise bid. Tax. General powers under the Local Government Act are unlikely to support the creation of a new tax or levy and so my thoughts are that this takes I was taking away some risk that I believe that would have been included if we had it. So coming to support the amendment and the changes. Frank Wilkie 19:33.649
Chairman Chen tzu-wee. The Council is quite right. There is no bed tax in Queensland currently. There are other councils that are working in collaboration with each other and the State government to bring one in as an option for councils to consider. But my understanding is that was only introduced in this clause as an example of something that may happen. Don't think it substantially changes the intent of this clause and as Councillor Nicola Wilson said that we do need to give TN some certainty and removal of this clause in here in my opinion in no way affects the intent of this clause or the certainty that the funding deed will deliver to Tourism Noosa and the industry. Brian Stockwell 20:27.447
That looks a bit stuck. Wish to talk. Just a question to staff. You've had this in advance. Are you happy that it doesn't materially affect the agreement? Kim Rawlings 20:36.806
Yeah, absolutely. It's just an example, so I think it makes, anyone else wish to talk? No? Councillor Wilson, do you wish to close? No, I've said it so many times. Brian Stockwell 20:49.256
Okay, I'll put the motion, or the amendment, that unanimous so the part amendment becomes part of the substantive motion. Amelia Lorentson 21:01.338
I'd like to move an amendment please, Through the Chair. That clause amended that clause for the be amended to include a new provision requiring that the funding deed and associated deliverables may be reviewed and adjusted where a material external shock occurs that significantly impacts the visitor economy including but not limited to sustained increases in fuel costs, significant changes to aviation capacity or routes, natural disasters or a sustained downturn in tourism demand. Any such must allow Council and the parties to jointly consider whether funding levels, priorities, KPIs or delivery expectations require adjustment to ensure the agreement remains realistic, fair and aligned with prevailing economic, aviation and market conditions and continues to deliver value for money and effective outcomes under changed circumstances. You have a second question. Do we have a seconder for that? Cancel. Those and. Councillor Wilson, Councillor Lorentson. The amendment ensures that the funding deed remains flexible. Practical and responsible practical and responsive to changing economic and global conditions. That are outside the control of either party. The tourism industry is highly sensitive to external factors such as fuel prices, aviation capacity, route availability, natural disasters and. Broader. Economic conditions as we're currently seeing. These factors directly influence visitor demand, market access and the effectiveness of destination marketing investment. In periods of significant change including sustained. Downturns in demand or reduced aviation capacity, it's important that our funding arrangements remain aligned with what is realistic and effective in prevailing conditions so that ratepayers funds continue to deliver genuine value for money and measurable outcomes. This amendment ensures that there's a clear and transparent mechanism for Council and the parties to jointly review whether there's adjustments needed in response to materially changed circumstances. What we're trying to do is to make sure basically threw it in there to strengthen the deed by ensuring that the agreement remains adaptable, accountable and capable of delivering effective results for the community over the term of the agreement, even in periods of significance. Significant external disruption. Tom Wegener 23:50.528
I'm having a question, worry so what I worry about is if is all if of a sudden, TN has contracts, has employees, has their budgets set, and if some downturn happens, would we. Consider lowering the war? Lowering what we're paying Tourism Noosa, and therefore they have to pass that on to is correct. Their employees? Amelia Lorentson 24:13.514
That is the intent of the cause, that we have the agility and flexibility to consider how much we're funding, to review KPIs, to review. Our performance measurements, to align. So yes, that that's the intent. Tom Wegener 24:35.873
I'll speak to it. When we first became Councillors, I think about six years ago, Noosa was facing the pandemic, and one of the most heartening things I ever felt from Noosa Council was when chastel says, "We will not fire anybody. Everybody's on our team, and never are we going to buckle." And worry and panic, and cut employees. I thought that was a really proud moment. I just thought, "I'm joining a good team, and this is so solid." So I worry about the legalities, first off, of this clause, whether it's legal or enforceable. And two, I like to, you know, we make a strong decision on something, we commit to it. We've committed to so many things, we commit to this. So I'm not sure of if I'll support it Brian Stockwell 25:34.332
Question Frank Wilkie 25:35.223
Thanks lukey the intention of this, is the intention of this amendment. That is, they're there being capacity to review the funding deed if there is an external shock already catered for in the wording of the funding deed. Kim Rawlings 25:59.805
Not really. So there's a clause for, which is the clause that Councillor Wilson has just sought an amendment for, which does talk about an opportunity to review based on an external event that relates to revenue. More broadly, no. So Lorentson did circulate this, and I did provide some initial feedback, but I've since got some feedback from our legal Council, and apologies to Councillor Lorentson, Lorentson, only just recently, but essentially she has advised that potentially what this could be is a force majeure clause, which would be a standard clause to go into a deed. Amelia Lorentson 26:40.277
Which I did request during the workshops, Kim. Brian Stockwell 26:45.392
The director's got the floor, please. No communication. Kim Rawlings 26:48.532
We can draft a force majeure clause and bring that back, maybe. And for inclusion, that would be a standard process. But that's essentially what this is about. If there are external events that are outside the control of parties that affect pandemic, like war, like shortage of supplies, essential, you know, natural disasters, that there is a clause by parties to be able to review the clause. So yeah, that would probably be the better way to do this, which will pick would pick up will all the things that you're looking to achieve. Amelia Lorentson 27:26.928
So Through the Chair, in that case, I'd like to withdraw this amendment, and then come back on at the Ordinary Meeting with a, the course that was recommended. With a, the Chair, in force majeure clause recommended by our in-house counsel. I'm happy with that. The same result. Thank you. She has drafted something and I'll circulate that councillors. To Councillors. Thank you very much. Brian Stockwell 27:51.216
So Councillors up to, the whole Council to agree to withdraw a motion. And we'll do it by show of hands, those in favour of withdrawing the motion. That's unanimous. Okay. We have only had Councillor Stockwell talk to this. Have we got anyone else who talk to the motion? Councillor Wilson. Nicola Wilson 28:27.423
In May last year, Council was presented with a report at a Special Meeting. Councillors had Councillors signalled they coming not comfortable extending the existing agreement with TN for over two years. The report at the Special Meeting presented the option of a 12 month agreement. In that 12 months, Council would determine the future of the relationship with TN. However, the end. Recommendation also included an instruction for Council to co-create a Roadmap for TN, detailing council's future expectation of TM's role, structure, future focus and actions, and further funding arrangements. TM's second payment was within a 12-month period, and TM's second payment This clause gave us no opportunity to end the agreement after 12 months. It pre-empted an ongoing relationship. Involved in writing the Roadmap did not allow us to objectively review council's needs and alignment with TM's services. It was just a tweak of the status quo. Notably, while Council was the co-creator of the that's 12 months ago. Roadmap, Councillors were not involved. That's 12-1-2-3. That 12-month agreement has turned into a four-year commitment by stealth. The decision should have only been on the 12-month agreement. Brian Stockwell 29:34.591
That meeting was made-- so, Councillor, I can pull you up. You made accusations that something was done in stealth, which is an accusation of impropriety. I thought that was drawn. Thank you. Nicola Wilson 29:45.283
Okay. The meeting may also commit to Council to consult with industry stakeholders and residents regarding any proposed funding decisions for TN. That never happened. Suggesting that consultation with the DMP cover this specifically, industry stakeholders and residents need to be specifically consulted about the dollar amount, the length of the agreement, and its value for our community. The questions in the were not enough to get a reliable response, with questions about funding being mixed in with questions about the types or levels of marketing. However, we did get some level of sentiment towards destination marketing in the community insights report. 55% wanted to review public funding of tourism, 47% to implement value-based marketing, 35% to diversify destination marketing, 87% wanted to maintain the current level of public funding of tourism and marketing, 31% wanted stop public funding, and then 35% wanted to stop promoting Noosa Shire to visitors all together. How does this deed reflect the community's wishes? The Ordinary Meeting in December 25 asked councils to approve the Roadmap in accordance with the requirements of the current 12-month deed prior to us ever receiving these insights and with most specific community or deed date should never have committed us to anything beyond that 12 months. When councils only have two days to prepare for these meetings, it's not always clear that the support is made up of unintended consequences. At the December meeting, I repeatedly asked what we were committing to, whether it was a preferred option, Roadmap, the $2 million per year, or the three years, and could not demonstrate an answer. I'm going to request a legal review to examine this process. The leading to last May was delayed due to significant delays in producing the DMP. The preferred option was for the Tourism Noosa to evolve and align with the DMP. Therefore, we would expect the goals and KPIs in this align with the DMP, but there are no clear KPIs in the DMP to align to. The priorities, KPIs and metrics referred to in schedule 1 are not KPIs, and I've made this clear many times and even offered to run a training session on KPIs since I used to teach this before. Are used you to list the forms. Seemingly, KPIs must meet the SMART criteria: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely. They are aligned to strategic goals, not everyday tasks. KPI is a legend. KPIs are numerical measures and use set improvement targets year-on or quarter-by The completion of routine tasks is not a KPI, nor should it form part of an incentive program for financial reward. Delivering full marketing campaigns a year should be core business. The performance aspect is the success of those campaigns. The performance adjustment of $350,000 means that TN can achieve few of these core objectives. And his chief, a few politicians, can still.6 billion. Receive 1.65 million in ratepayer funds. Revenue diversification. TN can meet the KPI that defines one dollar revenue. It does not have to achieve a particular figure only to report on it. Business cases must be presented. There's no requirement for it to them be implemented or anything about the quality, just deliver the report. The website must be refreshed but there's no metrics on how it performs. Deliver five quotes for the corporate events but no metrics on whether those events go ahead or their success. None of these KPIs you guys are measured making a in stand TN. For performance. It's in called its core business 4 for-H. Any stretch to deliver aspects of the DMP. Does not specify that the TN will receive funding to deliver any specific initiatives. If the DMP is our guiding policy on tourism, it's lacking on this key relationship. I can't support a team that's lacking in accountability to our community and has not had the required consultation. Brian Stockwell 33:27.747
And that's what you should do. I just wish to talk to the motion. Jessica Phillips 33:31.478
I'll speak to it. Councillor Phillips. Thank you. My concern with the deed is government governance. It's not the intent, not effort, but just governance. Because the deed does more than allocate funding. It embeds the DMP into how funding is being delivered how performance is measured and how success is reported and it does that before the strategy itself has been properly tested and that's where the problem starts for me because once you link funding to a strategy in this way you're no longer just supporting it you're locking it in. When we're being asked to commit two million dollars per year of rate payer money that comes with an obligation to be certain not hopeful that the strategy we are funding will deliver a benefit across the entire community and at this point for me that's doesn't exist there has been no demonstrated modelling that shows the economic impact across the Shire there is no clear evidence of how this will affect different sectors including the small and local businesses me there's been no meaningful assessment of unintended consequences in a community as diverse as ours that matters because what benefits one part of the economy does not automatically benefit all and that needs to be tested at not assumed. Instead the framework does is what it does is measure alignment to the DMP not outcome not impact alignment and that has created a structural problem in my opinion because once alignment becomes the measure of success the system begins to reinforce it the DMP sets the direction, the D requires alignment and the KPIs measure alignment and the reporting confirms the alignment but nowhere in that process is a clear independent mechanism that asks is the strategy actually working so for me it's a closed governance loop and a loop carries risk it creates a situation where funding can continue regardless of outcomes where strategies continue can continue without being properly tested and where issues are identified too late not early enough to correct the course. The consequence of this doesn't sit in this room it will actually sit in the community and there is also a second layer for me that relates to Tourism Noosa they are being funded to deliver Council aligned outcomes while also operating with constraints that limit public criticism of limit public criticism of Council and that matters because it affects independence if the organisation responsible for delivering a strategy is not in a position to openly challenge it then one of the key safeguards in good governance is weakened effective governance relies on independent challenge it relies on the ability to test assumptions to raise issues early and question direction when needed this structure will reduce that. I've also been told that the DMP can evolve over time but when funding KPIs and reporting are going to be built around alignment to a strategy that becomes difficult to prep in practice you're not just updating a document you're then trying to shift an entire performance and funding framework that's not flexible it's going to be constrained so when you step back and look at this as a whole the issue has become clear to me we're being asked to commit significant ongoing public funding to a strategy that has not been independently tested within a structure that reinforces alignment rather than outcomes and that limits the mechanisms that would normally challenge to improve it this is not whether tourism is important because it is and this is not to me whether Tourism Noosa is capable because I believe they are a professional, experienced, incredible organisation. This is where we are as Council, have met the standard required to allocate public funds in the best interest of this whole community and that standard for me is very clear. Decisions must be evidence based, they must be transparent and they must be accountable and right now that threshold has not been met because without clear evidence whole of Shire benefit, without understanding sector impacts and without testing unintended consequences, this is not evidence based decision making, it's assumption. I do not support walking in ongoing funding based on assumption, so the position is straightforward for me. The deed funds the implementation of a strategy and the question is not whether Tourism Noosa can deliver it. The question is whether there is sufficient evidence that the strategy they are being asked to deliver will benefit the entire community and at this point that has not been demonstrated. Without that it is not appropriate to link ongoing great payer funding to its success. Brian Stockwell 38:30.924
Thank you. Anyone else like to talk to the motion? Tom Wegener 38:42.140
With Jess, just to answer, my take on that is we voted the DMP in, and so that status quo that we have, and the DMP absolutely depends on the service of Noosa for its success. So, they're one and the same in a way. They actually need to work on each other. This is my understanding of Tewantin Noosa, because in order to achieve the goals of the DMP, we do it. Council can't do it. Council press can't do it. We know we can't do it. We actually need the groups around us marching shoulder to as it is. It's almost like we're coming out of the trenches shoulder to ready that seems pretty to face the future pretty dim in this world. So I kind of go back and step back and say the DMP is here. We have a new vision. This in Tourism Noosa has fantastically done a great job over the past 20 years. Overall, they do a really good job. This is the deed here, is the deed which changes the direction, changes how Tourism Noosa is going to work in order to supplement, implement the DMP. Because without it, we're not going to go anywhere with the DMP. And that's why I support it. We just, we've made a decision, we've set our edge, we've taken off. We have to follow through. And it's a good vision. The DMP is a positive vision for the future. And that's what this Council has committed to. So I think that I'm going to follow through with our commitment to implement the ideas and the thoughts put forward in the DMP because they are genuinely good. Frank Wilkie 40:34.053
To talk? Who's to close? Amelia Lorentson 40:39.411
Mr I would like to thank you. Today the question for me is not whether we can enter into this funding arrangement but whether we should commit to it in its current form. We've been asked to commit $2 million of dollars of public funds per year for three years, a total of six million dollars of ratepayer money. This is a significant long-term commitment that demands the various very highest standards of certainty and assurance around outcomes. The key issue for me is the KPIs. Must be strong enough measurable enough and enforceable enough to justify this level of public investment. I have concerns that they are not sufficiently outcome focused and may not provide a clear or objective basis to assess value for money over time. Further funding is largely guaranteed with only limited performance adjustment mechanism. 1 in full year one is paid full regardless of performance and KPIs can be reviewed and amended annually by mutual agreement this raises a fundamental concern as to whether we're dealing with a fixed accountability framework or a shifting set of measures over time. That matters because this is public funding regardless of its source once it's committed through Council it becomes public money and the community expects transparency, accountability and clear measurable outcomes. I have also concerned concerns around the consultation and I'm going to reference I think it's page six of the report in front of us. Funding decisions for Tourism Noosa include consultation with industry stakeholders and residents ensuring transparency and input into strategic investment in Noosa tourism's future. I'm not convinced that this has occurred in a meaningful way for this specific three-year funding commitment. While there has been broader consultation through DMP process that's not the same as the community being asked to consider a clear and explicit six million dollar funding decision over three years. That distinction matters because it the goes directly to public trust and confidence in how Council makes decisions of this scale. We're also operating in a period of global uncertainty with rising fuel costs, aviation volatility shifting demand continuing to impact local businesses. In that environment, Council needs funding arrangements that are robust, flexible and capable of responding to change. The funding agreement locks Council into fixed a three-year commitment without, in my opinion, adequate safeguards for changing conditions, without sufficiently strong performance measures and without the level of consultation I would expect for a decision of this magnitude. Is not about intelligence. Is not about intent and it's not about any organisation. It's about whether this deed as a governance instrument meets the standard I require as a Councillor when committing significant public resources. The question to me again is not whether the arrangement is possible, it's whether it's responsible. Good governance requires confidence in the detail, clarity on performance, meaningful consultation and a clear demonstration that public funds deliver value for money over time. The KPIs are not strong enough. The accountability framework is not clear enough and we do not have the level of certainty required for a commitment of this scale. When of uncertainty there is that level uncertainty around performance measures and government settings, it is appropriate and it is responsible to pause and reconsider whether the current framework is the right one going forward. That context, in my opinion, the best course may be to step back and reset to ensure that we get the governance framework, the performance measures and the accountability settings right from the outset. If today the decision is not to approve the funding deed, then that is what it is. That is part of responsible decision making. Arrangements evolve when they are no longer the right fit. And sometimes the most responsible sometimes the most responsible path forward is not refinement of what exists, but the opportunity to design something clearer, stronger and more fit for purpose for the future and one that truly meets the expectations of our residents and our local businesses. I therefore cannot. I in good faith support the report and the deed in front of us. Brian Stockwell 45:53.559
Thank you. Frank Wilkie 45:55.767
Anyone else? Mr Chamberlain. Councillors, been Councillors, what we have before us is following through on the commitment to deliver on the outcomes of the Destination Management Plan, which was a ratified decision of the Noosa Council. This local government has endorsed the Destination Management Plan. This tourism funding. Tourism Noosa funding and performance deed. Is a key part to delivering on some of the key actions and outcomes of the Destination Management Plan as promised to this community by the decision we made as a local government last year. It's easy enough to say, to express opinion on whether or not the KPIs are adequate enough or the process has been robust or the governance has been sufficient. That's one thing. It's another thing entirely. Read this report and be assured about the governance and the reviews and the partnership and the integrity that has gone into putting this funding deed together. I hear a lot of people say that they support evidence-based decision-making. The evidence before us is that the process that has gone into getting us to where we are has been robust. We've had internal legal review. We've had external legal review, we've had procurement support the whole process and assess this deed in terms of its relevance to the Local Government Act, specifically in relation to transparency and good governance. There is more than enough opportunity to amend and review this funding deed as we progress through the three years. Do not gamble with the future of this community. This funding deed is integral. To ensuring the things we love about Noosa withstand the pressures that we're going to be facing through increased massive population growth in South East Queensland, influx of visitation in the lead up to the 2032 Olympics. To say we need to delay and rebuild from ground up, in my opinion, is obstructionist and irresponsible and doesn't give the community and the industry the certainty that they deserve. We're here to make decisions. We've got. Don't recall any instance where there's been so much governance, internal and external legal review, procurement involved around any funding deed that Council has entered into before. Councillors, you've had your input into this. You've attended workshops on this. Yes, just because we. Our input these during those workshops, all of it isn't reflect. You see reflected in the documents that come before this Council, does not in any way diminish their value or the integrity of the process. We have excellent staff who are community members, who are just as invested in this working as we are, as the industry is, as the residents are. Councillors, don't gamble with the future of this community. Let's not delay anymore. Let's not. Give any one cause to anyone think that there's an obstructionist game being played here. Let's just get on with this, make the decision that the community expect us to make, endorse this because we've endorsed the Destination Management Plan and this is integral to the delivery of the Destination Management Plan. Thank you. Karen Finzel 49:44.107
I just have a question. Given the uncertainty around the table and comments and questions that have come to the table, this process has been increasingly categorised and characterised by complexity and rapid change externally and locally and abroad. So my question is, to address that changing landscape and uncertainty around. Future at so many levels of which we're all aware, is there an opportunity to provide some assurity of being able to progress this forward and perhaps instead of, can we amend it instead of a three years could we make it for one year? Can we test an amendment? Are you ready to amend that? So number A, like could we explore or debate the it the idea of approve it for one year? As opposed to three years? Is that Brian Stockwell 51:08.930
Is that luke's question to answer? Or is it luke's question? Karen Finzel 51:12.323
Through the Chair of the CEO. Larry Sengstock 51:17.352
I think we have to look back on, Through the Chair, I think we have to look back on why the decision was taken for a three year agreement is to give certainty to the organisations, both organisations, so to take it back to one year and we have, I've looked at the documentation, we have in December last year we made a commitment for a three year funding agreement with the intent then to work through and develop a deed which is then before you decide today, but it's based on, we based it on a three year agreement. Again, take it back to one year, I'm not sure that would be acceptable to Tourism Noosa because they are reliant on funding as we know for their ongoing business operations. So I just um to go to it take back to one year at this point would be quite regressive and difficult and would take some time for us to go back and I'm not sure that we would get to a point. Able we're able to provide certainty for any organisation going forward. Tom Wegener 52:33.207
Can I ask a quick question? We've talked about the abomination that Councillor Wegener went through to see you. No, I went through to see you. Brian Stockwell 52:44.637
Councillor Finzel? Karen Finzel 52:45.919
A question then to Councillor Wegener. Would you like to make a comment around the idea of making amendment on item number A as per my previous. Question. Tom Wegener 52:59.795
We one of our things that we did was we hung the Tourism Noosa and other groups out so badly at one time in our term that we need that suit that the security I think that they really need that security in order to do what they need to do or else we're right back to where we are point of order yes what's your Amelia Lorentson 53:21.863
Point of order is this commentary not a question being asked in Councillor Wegener's already spoken I'm confused if he was asked a question Brian Stockwell 53:31.574
And his response related to that question is unusual, but. It did take the form of an additional argument but it was a question and he did answer it Councillor Phillips second. I saw your hand up Jessica Phillips 53:52.680
Was that I think it was just a question to the CEO around it was goes to one yard that KPIs tied to DMP be would it be tricky because DMP is meant to be a 10-year ongoing Council Larry Sengstock 54:08.071
Phillips: absolutely, we will have to go back and readjust and re-look at all of that Councillor Phillips: Amelia Lorentson 54:13.897
And I would also to the CEO would a one-year amendment also be ultra vires or not ultra vires but would it be in keeping with the intent of the report in front of us which tied is to three years it was needed to move an alternative motion if that was the intent one the changes Brian Stockwell 54:43.432
Okay, two so I think you've got a question would you like to talk to the motion no thank you okay so I'll close so Councillors there's been a range of matters raised which are only marginally related to the decision in front of us. The assertion that we need more information is highly contestable. Never in the history of Noosa and probably in Australia has as much research been done on the local tourism industry as what we've done since we started the Destination Management Plan process. The information that Councillor Phillips seeks is very well covered within the first draft of paper that went out to the community and had huge response, which gave Council a very clear idea of where to go. We have a concept that strategies shouldn't lead agreements with co-deliverers, which is the opposite of the real world. I can recommend a very good book called network government, and that's what we're doing here. We recognise that to do the Destination Management Plan, we to have a have network a of co-deliverers. Deliverance. With any complex sustainability problem, if you don't bring the key stakeholders and the key industry along with you, are doomed to failure. Now, it's not a surprise to me that three councils who didn't vote for the Destination Management Plan have talked about this notion. But that's not the decision in front of us. The decision in front of us is, are we agreeing to the deed that complies with what was requested by us in the road? Matt. The answer is yes. We've had talks about KPIs and what KPIs should be and what Councillor Wilson pointed out in her world of financial management and business, what KPIs what are, KPIs are, it may be interpretive yes we can look at the KPIs in this agreement say there's not a whole lot of outcomes specified but that is once again linked back to the point that we're looking at Tourism Noosa to collaborate with Council and their industry in our community to drive forward to achieve these outcomes that can't be done by one individual organisation on its own to suggest that we don't as Councillors have enough knowledge of what the community and stakeholders desire and don't desire in this means you haven't been doing your job there's been no other issue prosecuted as much as this one and we know their upsides but we what we're certain of is that this organisation historically funded by a specific levy which was transferred a rate and a dollop of businesses and tourism enterprises is still funded by businesses and tourism enterprises so okay so to me this is a really straight forward dollop of and tourism enterprises okay so Councillors straightforward suggestion we have had a subcommittee of tourism NERCA working with our staff and their expertise but we as Councillors have been involved in numerous workshops in every step of the way our access to these and providing input is unmatched in Queensland unmatched the level of consultation that staff have with Councillors don't use that as an argument because it's a fallacious one Council is very simple prove the Roadmap and honour the agreements that we've made over time or if you don't support it brings council's reputation into disrepute I put the motion those in favour I that's Councillors Wilkie Wegener and Stockwell those against is Councillor Wilson Phillips Lorentson and Finzel the motions lost move on do we have a turnative motion that someone wishes to move- Sorry, the turn it a motion to I'll move that the matter of the Tourism Noosa funding agreement to be referred to the Ordinary Meeting on Thursday of this week. Frank Wilkie 59:43.624
I'll second it. Brian Stockwell 59:45.704
thank you. Does anyone wish to discuss? I it's just a deferral motion. Frank Wilkie 59:55.053
Support the I support the motion because I think I it gives this local government an opportunity to have an internal workshop on the repercussions of not approving the Tourism Noosa funding deed and what that means for the industry and the future of this community. Nicola Wilson 01:00:13.868
It sounds like you're trying to influence our votes, we've already voted. Brian Stockwell 01:00:16.234
No, that motion's been lost, now there has to be a motion on the item. So this is a new motion, the is a procedural one to refer it to the Ordinary Meeting. Amelia Lorentson 01:00:29.477
Can I seek please some governance advice on that? Sure. And can we maybe adjourn until we get that advice please? I'm happy to move happy to move to adjourn. After Councillor Finzel's question. Brian Stockwell 01:17:34.141
Okay, welcome back. During the adjournment, the CEO had a chance to discuss the matter with governance and the question was whether the motion to. Procedural motion to defer to the Ordinary Meeting was in accordance with orders. So, um, Mr CEO, do you have a view on that now? Larry Sengstock 01:17:58.367
So the process, and we've just had an adjournment to discuss this with our, um, governance team and to look at the, um, the Standing Orders. The process is that the motion went forward, it was lost, so therefore there's still nothing to take forward in terms of going, so we need to have another motion. Now, whether that's a procedural motion or an alternate motion, um, is both, um, acceptable in my understanding, um, and the Chair has put up a procedural motion as the first. Now, it hasn't been, uh, has it been. Second. Yes, it has. Um, before we then went into adjournment. So, that's the position currently, is, um, because it was lost, it then goes into a, um. Because it we still need a motion that's, to take forward to, um, our Ordinary Meeting, because it's a General Committee. Remember, this is not the final deciding, or decisive meeting. Amelia Lorentson 01:18:59.949
Um, through the CEO. Just for clarity, what section in the Standing Orders, um, states that a procedural motion can be moved after a decision's made? My understanding, it has to be done during the debate, before a decision's made. Can you just state what section in the standing order you're referring to? Larry Sengstock 01:19:23.941
Yeah. Because there was no decision taken, that's the advice I've been given. There's no decision taken, so the procedural motion is 31, but there's no decision taken, so it's open to discussion. Amelia Lorentson 01:19:37.178
Can I have a reference please what section in the Standing Orders states that a procedural motion can be moved once a decision has been made? Brian Stockwell 01:19:47.545
So I'll answer it as the Chair, and this will be my ruling, and you can vary from your. Ruling is the decision hasn't been made. A motion was put up which was lost, so there is no decision on the books in regard to the item in front of us. Frank Wilkie 01:20:05.907
If there was a motion that Council not approve the Tourism Noosa funding and performance deed as read, that would be considered a motion? Brian Stockwell 01:20:15.964
Yes. So the Council could have considered any motion, I put it around, there was no one at hand so I did the. So at the moment we are proceeding on the basis that the motion to defer to the Ordinary Meeting is legitimate. Is a motion. It's open to the meeting to either vote for it or against it. Frank Wilkie 01:20:43.364
But the point is you're making, Mr Chair, is that whether it's this one or another motion, some sort of motion needs to be ratified by this majority of these Councillors to go to the Ordinary Meeting and appear on the Ordinary Meeting agenda. That's correct. Tom Wegener 01:21:00.731
Question. Yes. So could it be that to say we that nothing was decided we were not going to fund that we don't want going to pursue the deed and would that be the motion that people would be okay that's it like is that an example of a motion that would be made that confirms basically have to confirm that you did not vote for the deed Brian Stockwell 01:21:26.224
That would be an option if the current procedural motion falls Amelia Lorentson 01:21:30.880
I'm not going to support the procedural motion in front of us because I have an alternative motion that I would like to test and I've circulated it to all the Councillors some time ago thank you Brian Stockwell 01:21:46.812
Anyone else I just the okay I'm done I'm sorry again I don't I'm sorry it is a procedural master motion they all can talk to it. Anyone else wish to talk to the procedural motion? Jessica Phillips 01:22:08.811
I'll speak to it I won't support this because I would prefer to see if there's an alternative motion. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 01:22:17.107
Okay. Karen Finzel 01:22:19.550
Well just to clarify we're voting now on the procedural motion to take it to yes I have a question just for clarification Through the Chair to the CEO. Terms of the Standing Orders can in orders can you confirm that we are unable to pull it out of the Ordinary Meeting if it just moves forward today without the motion? We need a Larry Sengstock 01:22:42.571
Need to have, my understanding, and this is with the governance, sorry, Through the Chair, is we still need to have something that we take to ordering. So whether that's the procedural motion or whether it's an alternate motion that then goes to ordering, at ordinary we've got the ability then. You've got the ability, to pull it back out and relitigate or discuss but we need to have something to take forward this the Standing Orders are quite silent on this but because there's nothing on the books it's open emotion and whether that's a procedural motion or an alternative or not is available to us is my advice question. Brian Stockwell 01:23:20.409
Can you come up with councillors first and then councillors? Amelia Lorentson 01:23:23.001
Do just a correction, it says General Committee, the vote to the General Committee is just the Ordinary Meeting and we normally don't have to put a date, don't we? That was done in a bit of a hurry. Brian Stockwell 01:23:34.289
It's April 16th Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 01:23:42.800
I have section 31.1 of our Standing Orders in front of me. It states very clearly 31.1 procedural motions. A Councillor at a meeting of Council may the debate of a matter at the meeting move as a procedural motion following motions. I think it's very clear that you know I'm still challenging whether a procedural motion can be moved after the debate. Says very clearly during the debate of a matter. Brian Stockwell 01:24:16.938
I'll take that as a point of order and I've given my ruling on it before which I disagree with that view. Okay so I'm just going to put the motion those in favour? Thank you. And that councillor Councillors is Wilkie. Do we get to have another? Wegener, Councillor Stockwell so that we still people the against. Counts. Sorry, better not put my hand up both ways. Councillor Wilson, Councillor Phillips, Councillor Lorentson, Councillor Finzel. And do we have a further motion? I'd like to move an alternative motion, thank you. Amelia Lorentson 01:24:52.145
That Council eight, notes the report regarding. The proposed funding arrangement with Tourism Noosa. Can you just give me a moment to catch up with you? Sure. I've sent it in an email 10 minutes is this the right one? That's correct, yes. That Council A, notes the report regarding the proposed funding arrangement with Tourism Noosa. B, does not adopt the proposed deed in its current form. C, requests that the Chief Executive Officer prepare an interim funding arrangement. For Tourism Noosa to ensure continuity of core destination marketing services and F, notes that the intent of this resolution is to ensure continuity of tourism promotion services while Council undertakes a full review of governance, funding arrangements and community consultation. Do we have a seconder for that motion? I've got a second. Councillor Phillips was the seconder. Councillor Lorentson? I just think this is the correct way forward. It acknowledges the decision that's been made around the table today and also ensures that a short there's some continuity while full review is undertaken. I'm surprised that default position for funding for Tourism Noosa had or a contingency planning hadn't been put to us in case this didn't go through so I think this gives us the opportunity to provide some continuity ensure that there is continued core destination marketing services delivered and that we have the opportunity to review the agreement the funds funding arrangements and most importantly ensure that we deliver on our May 2025 resolution which was to consult with community in terms of tourism investment Brian Stockwell 01:27:41.588
Others wish to talk to the motion Tom Wegener 01:27:47.718
Councillor made that sorry Wegener just my thoughts are the axe is fallen I think that we have voted to not support tourism you said he did just do to continue on it day I just don't support this say that we're gonna including community consultation and a four of you in governance we've been doing that for two years now kind of over it like cut the head off the snake we did it but I won't support it look Frank Wilkie 01:28:26.383
I'm really surprised that a plan B something that in the making for such a long time that is inextricably linked to the delivery of the Destination Management Plan has just been conjured up in the last ten minutes 10 certainly we need something to go forward to Thursday because by that time we may have some legal advice about what Tourism Noosa may do with their next step how we've left them exposed look I'll probably be in a minority and this will have something to go to thursday's meeting I can't support this resolution because it's a hastily cobbled together plan B that pales in into insignificance when compared against the rigour and the governance and the partnership and good faith that has gone into preparing the deed, which as we know, internal, external, funding, external legal advice, procurement advice, clear KPIs and part D is a full review of governance, funding arrangements, community consultation, it's so broad. Council's governance, council's funding arrangements, community consultation. Look, I can't support it in principle, but at least we'll have something on the books to go forward to thursday's meeting. I wish time will, I hope all Councillors will be fully aware of what they're doing. Others wish to talk? Karen Finzel 01:30:31.320
Just in response to the no plan B, I mean this was discussed very early on around if this came to the vote to Councillors it would fall either way. So, you know, it's nothing new, it just is we didn't have, through the negotiations and everyone working hard for the partnership, we never found agreement in my opinion and this is where it's landed. So, I just put that comment forward in terms of. Rebutting what the Mayor said with regards to that because there has been discussion along the journey around that potential to happen. Brian Stockwell 01:31:35.221
Others wish to talk? Councillor Lorentson Amelia Lorentson 01:31:36.622
Wish to close. I will. I'm just going to just draw everyone's attention to the 18th of December 2025 decision where there were only six Councillors and it was a split vote and the decision was made with the casting of raising new matters. When you close you are not allowed to do that under the Standing Orders. I will close by acknowledging what Councillor Finzel in terms of this should come as no surprise. There has been discussions during the workshop and a split decision made on the 18th of December 2025 split 3-. One Councillor was away. This to me should not be a surprise and if anything we should have had some contingency planning in place understanding that this was very contentious both around this table and also in community. I think this is a responsible way forward we have also the opportunity between now and Thursday to understand what the legal financial and operational and consequences are and once again possibly would have been great to have this information knowing that it was going to be contentious before it came to a meeting today okay Brian Stockwell 01:33:05.382
I put the motion those in favour that's Councillor Lorentson and Phillips those against that is that's Councillor Wilson. Wilkie Finzel Wegener and Stockwell so we have yet to we have a successful motion on this item does else have an alternative motion they wish to move Councillor Wilson Nicola Wilson 01:33:37.130
The same as what Councillor Lorentson just raised but without part C and D thank you. Brian Stockwell 01:33:54.163
Yes I agree yes cancels. Council's are you clear what this one it is while equating it'll say that Council notes the report regarding the proposed funding agreement arrangement with Tourism Noosa and B does not support the proposed deed in its current form have we got a seconder for that happy to I think she's second. Councillor Lorentson, Councillor Wilson you have the floor. Nicola Wilson 01:34:28.348
I think this is just this is a position that we've arrived at through the vote of the previous motion but to put it into turn it around into a turn an action world. That we can take forward to the Ordinary Meeting. Also I think maintaining that the deed in its current form still leaves potentially the option open to amend the deed or still have conversations. Frank Wilkie 01:34:55.370
Conversations. I'll support that Mr Chair. It's a sensible way forward. It gives us opportunity to actually get an understanding of how the deed can be amended to take on board concerns that Councillors do have and even dare I hope for a consensus. I've been called an optimist. I hope that we can reach a consensus but it at least leaves that door open. Thank you Councillor Wilson. Amelia Lorentson 01:35:27.571
I'm also happy to support it. I think it's again one of our obligations that we come to meetings. With open minds and final decisions made at Ordinary Meeting. I think removing A and B was the correct way to go ahead so thank you Councillor Wilson and I'm happy to support the amendment. Brian Stockwell 01:35:52.549
Anyone else wish to talk to the motion? Councillor Finzel. Karen Finzel 01:35:54.792
Yes, I'm happy to support the amendment. I do believe we need to leave it open to move through this because this is, you know, a partnership involving not only tourism. This is a partnership between the organisation and our community. It's a partnership between Councillors and our community and the people we live and work amongst every day. This is a really major decision. This came up in our previous election campaign. Opinion, communities strongly raised their concerns around continued funding in its current form around tourism and we're all aware of that. We've read the reports, we've discussed it around the table at workshops we're of that. We've we the we've table at have and we have actually done our jobs, I might add, and we have worked diligently. And we represent a modern day leadership group with diversity around the table, understanding that we need to respond to changing expectations. In our community and abroad, given the current circumstances that are beyond our control. What is within our control today is to continue this debate to try and reach a consensus that actually gives fair and equal representation to all. Our partners. It is with diligence and with code of conduct that we as Councillors move to this position and I do take a front being told or insinuating that we're at being told or insinuating that we have not done our job right. Jobs. The Councillors have worked hard, the staff has worked hard, external community has worked hard. The voices of our people have clearly been indicated to each of us as Councillors within our areas of influence. We have respected Tourism Noosa, their board and what they've come to the table with in good faith. So I'm happy to support this because we need the rise of we leaders, that we come together with diversity but collectively we make those decisions for the best outcome at that given time for all the people that I've just mentioned that we represent the different sectors. So I'm happy to support this I believe that successful leaders that successful leaders are able to move forward and take on board the ever-changing environment complexities, the diversity the complexities just as we did cope. In COVID. So I'm confident that this going forward gives us opportunity to further give extra time and expertise rather just us going to and being rather adversarial. Than just going being admonished. For being told we had heard enough, we have been given enough. Clearly the outcome here today supports that is not necessarily the case. So in closing I would like to thank each and every person that has worked on this in good faith to try and achieve a fair and equitable outcome for everyone that we represent in this community. Thank you. Amelia Lorentson 01:39:15.549
I think the amendment's not correct. It's C and D that was-- Brian Stockwell 01:39:21.016
That's what you were intending to do? yes. oh, so not A and B, remove A and B. No, no. no, no, that's correct. I think Councillor Lorentson misunderstood. Amelia Lorentson 01:39:27.465
he does not adopt THE PROPOSED STATEMENT. Jessica Phillips 01:39:33.032
Speak to it. I've been talking to my kids a lot about integrity and honesty lately and for me it just circles back to the way we make really really good decisions is by being honest at the table and in workshops and when I sat with the Tourism Noosa board which was two years into my term or not quite but I was surprised that would take so long when we were in partnership with an organisation to try and be on the or gain an as to where they were at and where we were at as a new Council I think the community expect us to be honest with them and honest about the fact that they are scrutinising more than ever where we spend money and so for me it's just bringing back some true honest conversation that has no bias or no already decision made and just really rip the band-aid off and say you know what is this what do we want and it just fit to me it's become so complex from different opinions and we should just really go back to I know that the man is not impressed with my wording of evidence-based decision making but for me think that speaks the truth and I think that's what the community are asking for us so I'll support the amendment because I do think it's not surprising to me that we're sitting here today with this in front of us. Brian Stockwell 01:41:13.864
Anyone else wish to talk to the motion? Councillor Wilson. Nicola Wilson 01:41:16.386
So this is just the as I said before the previous motion this is as the motion was lost this is the outcome of that I'm not getting any more I'm not trying to add anything else in at this late stage but it is the door open just saying in its current form so it doesn't necessarily mean it's the end of our relationship with Tourism Noosa it just means that we don't support the deed in its current form. There have been comments today which I'm quite offended by about council's not doing their job or the council's wanting more information or the council's not understanding the consequences of their actions and I'm going to pull you up that is not a close that was regarding to the previous debate when you're closing your banking. So I'm just saying I'm quite happy that I've done plenty of work on this motion or the previous motion which resulted in this motion. I can do my job. I have done all my research. I sought advice and I don't need to be pressured in the next three days about changing my vote. That's it. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 01:42:24.813
Thank you. I'll put the motion. Those in favour? That's Councillor Wilson Wilkie Phillips, Lorentson and Finzel and Wegener. And against would be Councillor Stockwell. And I will apologise if in the last debate I did. Sound like I was admonishing. It wasn't my intent. Was to say that I think that if we didn't have a clear understanding, but I'll accept the trade concerns, so I will apologise. OK, we'll move on now, which the next session is. A confidential session. We're going to deal with these items two separately, so we're going to. If I can have a motion just to go in for item one in confidential session section nine, please. Amelia Lorentson 01:43:23.500
I'm happy to move that the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J3G of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a contract proposed to be made by Council and in particular potential commercial negotiations in relation to the contracts for item 9.1. Confidential contract award, contract number CN26032 Noosa Aquatic Centre Noosa Aquatic Centre 50M Pool Water Treatment Plant filtration upgrade works Brian Stockwell 01:43:59.078
Do I have a seconder? I'll second it then. Councillor Wilkie, all in favour? I think we're down to all staff in the room now. Unidentified Speaker 01:44:09.629
So who was going to talk. Brian Stockwell 01:57:37.282
And we'll just put them in there, okay, so we'll. So welcome back. We're considering item 9.1 for a contract award for the Noosa Aquatic Centre 50M Pool. Water treatment plant Filtration Upgrade Works. Do we have a mover for the. We're moving the staff recommendation. Councillor Phillips and I think I saw Councillor Finzel's hand seconded. Do you wish to talk to the motion, Councillor Phillips? Jessica Phillips 01:58:05.612
Yes, thank you for the report. This is one of my favourite places in Noosa. I will be a little bit sad for 12 weeks, but I think the community should be really pleased to know that a Noosa. Much-loved Noosa, you know, place to take kids and lap swimmers and sport swimmers and the likes. And all the other factors, the NAC, you know, the gym and everything. So I'm just very pleased to. Support our sport and active lifestyle in Noosa and I think that it should be celebrated with our community that we're making sure that we've got some really good equipment. Obviously filtration to me is something that would be pretty important at a pool, so. I'm be here. Glad to see, and I may have dived under the kids pool the other day playing a game, and I'm just really glad there's going to be some new filtration systems. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 01:59:03.909
Thanks. And COs. The CEO's pointed out that as this was a confidential item, it might be beneficial for the motion to be read out, so I'll do that. Note the report by the sport and active lifestyle manager to General Committee, dated 13th April 2026, regarding the outcome of the tender process for noosa's aquatic centre 50 metre pool water treatment plant, filtration upgrade works and award contract numbers CN26032. For Noosa Aquatic Centre 50 metre pool water treatment filtration upgrade works to CMP Corp Pty Ltd under a lump sum contract for a total contract value of $1,210,780.40 GST inclusive and see delegate to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate, finalise and execute and do all things necessary to administer and vary the contract on behalf of Council. Is there anyone else who wishes to talk to the motion? No? Are you happy not to close Councillor Phillips? Put the motion those in favour? That's unanimous. So we move on to the next item which is a contract award report for the Cooroy Gymnasium upgrading extension and Councillor Phillips you have a declaration. Jessica Phillips 02:00:20.697
I do in accordance with chapter 5 of the Local Government Act 2009 I inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to item 9.2 confidential contract award report contract number CN 25048 Cooroy genesee Cooroy Gymnasium upgrade and extension on this agenda because I am working 10 hours per week as the general manager and coach of the Cooroy Gymnastics Club and as a result of my conflict of interest I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 02:00:53.549
I invite Councillor Phillips to leave the meeting room. And Councillors could I have a motion to move into confidential session please. Councillor Finzel I think had her hand up first and Councillor Wegener we're happy that it's a standard wording we don't need to read that out. All in favour? That's unanimous. Brian Stockwell 02:15:11.074
The live stream yes we're live all right so welcome back how we've only got the final item. Happy to move. By Councillor Lorentson and seconded by Councillor Finzel. Councillor Lorentson do you wish to talk to the motion? Amelia Lorentson 02:15:32.381
I'll read the motion firstly but Council a note the report by the I the project manager. And graduate engineer to the General Committee Meeting dating dated 13 April 2026. The award contract number CN25048 for Cooroy gymnastics upgrade and extension to Murphy Builders QLD Pty Ltd under a lump sum Design & Construct contract for an estimated total,692 million, $692,000, $575,000.40. GST excluded as follows. One, the lump sum amount of $3,218,000, so $3,218 and,467.73. Two, the provision of additional scope for the removal of value management options for an amount of $251,607.67. Three, a provisional sixty seven items of $222,500.00. And C, delegate authority to the CEO to negotiate, finalise, execute and do all the things necessary to administer and vary the contract on behalf of Council. Thank you. Do you wish to now speak to that, Councillor Lorentson? Just to firstly- just to firstly acknowledge the report, graduate engineer Ann Jasper, just noting it was really well done. And also to make note, the core gymnasium upgrade it's the only gymnasium, competitive gymnasium facility we've got in the Shire. It's well used, loved. Well loved, and we have excellent stuff. Staff there, including our own Councillor who works there as a coach. I also note, I think it's the first time or first time in a long time that they actually had gymnasts attending a state event down in Brisbane. Again, anything to do with sport and our community, bring it on. We need to be upgrading, extending and providing opportunities for all our sporting groups, membership and growing needs. In the Shire, to help keep our youth active and out of their screens, again, we cannot support enough as a Council and also as a group of Councillors. So, thank you for the report in front of us and, yep, happy to support. Brian Stockwell 02:18:14.820
Anyone else wish to speak to the motion? Councillor Finzel. Councillor Finzel Karen Finzel 02:18:16.776
Yeah, just quickly. It's all been said. Thank you for the report. I'd like to also acknowledge the stakeholders and the community, ongoing community engagement that had the privilege to go along to that, and that was a quite extensive work, and everyone did a great job, so thank you to everyone who's been involved in providing. A facility that, you know, is at that standard that we can find and train young people to a standard where, you know, perhaps we can find a few olympians in the Shire. So, thank you. Brian Stockwell 02:18:51.583
Lorentson, need to close? Thank you. I'll put the motion. Those in favour? That's unanimous. That brings us to the meeting closed but we should give the opportunity, thank you, we should give the opportunity to Councillor Phillips if she's still in attendance to rejoin the meeting so we can close it. Related Noosa Council Meetings
← Browse all Noosa Shire Council meeting transcripts
