08/0310 - MCU - Wellbeing Type 2 - Social [As Published] · 132008.310

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

 

COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; WILD RIVER AREA

 

41

 

ls any of the operationa! work proposed to be carried out within a coastal management district?

OO No

CJ Yes
If yes, is the proposed operational work for the following?
« Interfering with quarry material on State coastal land above high-water mark [CINo (1) Yes
© Disposing of dredge spoil or other solid waste material in tidal waters [No [1] Yes
© — Draining or allowing drainage or flow water or other matter across State costal land above (No (Yes

high-water mark

+ — Constructing or installing works in a watercourse where the works are not assessable under [] No D Yes
IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 4, items 3 or 4

© Reclaiming land under tidal water (No [1 Yes
Constructing an artificial waterway, other than a canal, associated with reconfiguring alot (No [).Yes

© Constructing an artificlal waterway that is a canal, assoclated with reconfiguring a CINo C1 Yes
lota

+ — Constructing an artificial waterway not associated with reconfiguring a lot on land, otherthan []No [] Yes
State coastal land, above high-water if the maximum surface area of water on the waterway
is at least 5,000m?

e — Constructing a bank or bund wali to establish a ponded pasture on land, other than State CiNo (Yes
coastal land, above high-water mark

e — Removing or interfering with coastal dunes on land, other than State coastal land, that is in C1No (Yes
an erosion prone area and above high-water mark

Ifyes to one or more, is any of the proposed work to be carried out in a wild river area under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

CO No - (Complete Part M) This application requires assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). if EPA is not
the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. If yes, above, fo any

| shown bold and marked with the symbol 8 the application also requires assessment by Queensiand-Fransport {Marine-—-—

Safety Qid) as Concurrence Agency,

DC Yes .
If yes, is all of the proposed operational work for specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

LD Yes - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment
Manager must refuse to receive it (Complete Part M) This application requires assessment by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). if EPA is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction
as concurrence Agency. if yes, above, to any shown bold and marked with the symbol, the application also
requires assessment by Queensland Transport (Marine Safety Qld) as Concurrence Agency. Subject fo the
declaration for the relevant wild river area, the application also requires assessment for the purposes of the Wild
Rivers Act 2005.

(_No - An application for the operational work would be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager
must refuse to receive it.

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 4, tem 5

IP Regulation. schedule 2, table 2, tems 12 and 14

IP Regulation, schedule 1, part 3, table 4, itams 4A and 5

Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 Act 1995, section 104A (wild river area)

 

Wild Rivers Act 2009, section 43A