Original source · versioned page text
Planning Report - MCU19-0030
proposal report
4.0 Planning assessment
4.1 Pre-lodgement
A pre-lodgement meeting was undertaken with Noosa Council officers on 14th February 2019 with
Council officers Glen Conforti and Mark Lewis to discuss planning requirements and key issues
applicable to this development application.
A copy of the pre-lodgement meeting minutes is contained in Appendix D. A summary of the key
issues is discussed below:
Table 3: Summary of key issues
Issue Council response Applicant response
Building height Minor dispensation would be Applicant has revised the
considered however proposed proposal and reduced the height
13.1m is considered of the building to 12.48metres
excessive
Gross Floor Area Proposal to comply with GFA Plans have been modified to
requirements comply with GFA requirements
Built form East and western elevation Plans have been modified with
are considered bulky and additional articulation to
require articulation. elevations and use of different
building materials. A range of
Lightweight design and variety materials such as Linea
of external building materials weatherboard, rendered block
suggested. work with expressed grooves,
timber batten screens and
glazing are utilised.
Roof form Consideration for a 5 degree Eave has been extended over
roof pitch to the western western elevation.
portion of the roof.
Privacy Concerns raised with regard Roof terrace removed
to overlooking from roof
terrace.
Basement Basement to comply with Basement complies with
definition. definition.
Landscaping Provide details with regard to Pool and fencing have been
swimming pool and front setback from Gympie Terrace
fence. Allow for landscaping frontage.
to screen pool and fence.
Second gatehouse may be One gatehouse proposed.
considered.
Setbacks Front setback are acceptable. Setbacks as detailed retained.
Side setbacks are consistent.
Concerns with upper level Shadow diagram illustrates third
balcony, stairs and lift in 8m level intrusion into setback area
rear setback. Potential for does not significantly impact on
overlooking and shading to shading over adjoining premises
the southern site. to the south. Rear terraces and
stairs appropriately screened to
minimise overlooking. Minimum
martoo consulting
town planners + urban designers + development managers page 10 of 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.