Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 5 - Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (11.4 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Original PDF page 36, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v1 NCES REF: J000542 Lot 9 on RP225312 – 100 Cooyar Street, Noosa Heads 7.2 State Planning Policy – Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience The Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning’s State Planning Policy – State interest guidance material – Natural hazards, risk and resilience – Bushfire (December 2019) contains the development assessment benchmarks for natural hazards, risk and resilience - bushfire. The SPP assessment benchmarks prevail over those prescribed in the Noosa Plan Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code where they involve the same design elements. An assessment of the proposed development’s compliance with each of the assessment benchmarks has been provided below. Assessment Benchmark 3 For development in a bushfire prone area involving vulnerable uses 1. Vulnerable uses are not established or intensified within the bushfire prone area unless: a. there is an overriding need in the public interest for the new or expanded service the development provides b. there are no other suitable alternative location within the required service catchment, and c. site planning can appropriately mitigate the risk (for example, siting ovals for an educational establishment between the hazardous vegetation and structure. The vulnerable use is already established within the bushfire prone area and no intensification of people living or congregating on the site is proposed. The development design makes use of existing and proposed bushfire mitigation measures that appropriately mitigate the risk. Assessment Benchmark 4 Assessable Development Development contributes to an effective and efficient emergency response and recovery capabilities. In the first instance, this can be achieved by new or expanded community infrastructure that is providing essential services (emergency services, hospital and educational establishment) not being in a bushfire prone area, as addressed in assessment benchmark 3. To ensure emergency services can respond effectively, development is located within a reticulated water supply area or includes a dedicated static water supply that is available solely for fire-fighting purposes and can be accessed by fire-fighting vehicles. Reticulated water is available to the site. Assessment Benchmark 5 Assessable material change of use Site layout places the landscape and open spaces within the site between premises and adjacent mapped medium, high or very high potential bushfire intensity areas. This landscaping and open space comprises protective landscape treatments that: 1. Comprise only low threat vegetation, including grassland managed in a minimal fuel condition16, maintained lawns, golf courses and cultivated gardens; or 2. Are designed to ensure a potential available fuel load is maintained at less than 8 tonnes/hectare in aggregate and with a fuel structure that remains discontinuous. Note – The landscape or open space may be located within the mapped medium, high and very high intensity areas to create a separation between the development and the balance of the bushfire prone area. The proposed development footprint boundary is separated from the hazardous vegetation areas. It is recommended that any new landscaping associated with the proposed works maximises the use of low-flammability species and or avoids clustering of flammable species. Where involving a requirement for revegetation or rehabilitation outside of bushfire prone areas © 2022 35
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.