Original source · versioned page text
Att 2 - Traffic Plan
Attached to the e-mail Retail Bus Type 2 Shop & Salon, Multiple Housing Type 4 Conventional (2 units) & Boundary Realignment (3 lots into 3) - MCU18/0158 & RAL18/0017.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn34 Elm St, Cooroy some accesses that do not comply with the Normal Design Domain (NDD) standards. If applicable, this will reduce the required SISD. 2.5 Sight Distance Improvements Currently the sight distance from the southern access to the vehicles travelling south on Elm street is restricted by the low vegetation associated with the existing street tree. The sight distance would increase to 36m with an observation angle of 109 degrees if the low vegetation from the existing street tree is removed. Figure 5 – Vegetation restricting sight distance to the vehicles travelling south on Elm St. It is also recommended that a kerbside solid yellow line be installed from the exit only access to the southern end of the current bus bay location on Elm St. This line will restrict vehicles from stopping in the sight distance zone, protecting the sight distance for vehicles exiting from the site. 2.6 Requirement to comply with Extended Design Domain EDD criteria can be used to determine the required sight distance where the NDD cannot be achieved and the geometric road design complies with criteria specified in Austroad’s Guide to Road Design Part 3 Appendix A. In this instance the road is located in an urban footprint and the operating speed is ≤ 70 km/hr. The requirement for compliance for the EDD is that the lane width is greater than 3.0 m. In this instance, the Opal St lane width will be approximately 4.25m once the development has been completed. Furthermore, the site complies with all general considerations as detailed in Austroads Part 3, A.3.1. As such, the proposed driveway complies with the requirements to be assessed under the EDD. 360 Civil Consulting - Traffic Assessment Page 9 of 22
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.