Original source · versioned page text
Information Response - Email 1 of 2 MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (22.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Please refer to the response prepared by JWA Ecological Consultants (Attachment VI) and the Bushfire Management Plan dated February 2015 (Attachment IV). EFFECT OF LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN ON BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT 25. Provide an appraisal of the Landscape Concept Plan with relation to the Bushfire Management Plan and asset protection zones. Please refer to the response prepared by JWA Ecological Consultants (Attachment VI), which states that the preparation of JWA letter dated 16th December 2017 (lodged with the original application) included an assessment/appraisal of the Landscape Concept Plan prepared by Mark Baldock Landscape Architect (Drawing No. 1611‐ LCP1, ISSUE A). Any amendment/revisions to this Plan will need to be assessed for compliance with the BMP. TRAFFIC 26. Provide further information detailing the dimensions of all garages, car spaces and carports. Please note that all car parking must be in accordance with the relevant user class as defined in AS/NZS2890.1:2004 Please refer to the amended architectural plans prepared by Sprout Architects (Attachment VII), which now shows the dimensions of all car parking spaces. As shown on the attached plans, all residential bays have been designed as type 1A (2.4m x 5.4m), while the visitor spaces and the spaces for the short term accommodation have been designed as type 2 (2.5m x 5.4m). As part of all open car park areas, the isle widths have been maintained at 5.8m in width, while all single garages are designed to be at a minimum 3.0m x 6.0m and the double garages at a minimum 6.0m x 6.0m. 27. Amend the plans to clearly identify, by number, the car spaces associated with the free standing units. Please refer to the amended architectural plans prepared by Sprout Architects (Attachment VII), which now have the numbering for all car parking spaces throughout the development. Refer to drawing SD28 within the attached package. 28. Modify the proposal to provide convenient pedestrian paths from the unit building to the existing path in Sandpiper Court, and to the existing path system at the shopping centre (running adjacent to the parallel visitor parking bays). Please refer to the amended architectural plans prepared by Sprout Architects (Attachment VII), which now includes convenient pedestrian paths through the development that connect the site to both Rufus Lane and Sandpiper Court through the existing Village Market Place. An additional pathway has been included along visitor parks 1 ‐2, which then enters the Peregian Village Market Place and follows an approved pedestrian path to Sandpiper Court. 29. Accurately identify where wheelie bins would be placed along the internal roadway for collection, for each dwelling, allowing for both general waste bins and recycle bins. Please refer to the amended architectural plans prepared by Sprout Architects (Attachment VII), which now shows the location of the bin collection point within the road reserve for each dwelling. It is noted that the
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.