Council archive · source document
RFI - Attachment B - Stormwater management Report · MCU20/0026
Original PDF page 9, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Table 3 below compares the peak flow rates and total runoff volume for the existing and developed
model.
Table 3 - XP Storm Results
Duration Peak Flow Rate (L/s) Total Volume (m3)
AEP Median Storm
(min) Pattern Existing Developed Existing Developed
10% 10 8 21 16 (-5) 8.41 4.48 (-3.94)
25 5 16 12 (-4) 14.94 9.70 (-5.24)
60 6 13 10 (-3) 23.10 16.54 (-6.57)
1% 10 8 32 30 (-2) 15.35 11.36 (-3.99)
25 10 28 25 (-3) 27.44 21.67 (-5.77)
60 6 24 23 (-1) 43.42 35.91 (-7.51)
As shown in Table 3, the peak flow rate of stormwater runoff and the total runoff volume off site has not
increased as a result of the development. The proposed infiltration/detention tank is therefore
considered to be adequate. Results for the 10 minute duration for the 1% AEP event are outlined in
Figure 4 & 5 below.
Total runoff volume across NE
boundary (Node A inflow) = 15.35m3
Peak flow rate across
NE boundary = 32L/s
Figure 4 – XP Storm Results; Pre-Developed Model (1% AEP, 10 minute duration)
11 June 2020 Stormwater Management Report 6
S20-023 40 Park Crescent, Sunrise Beach
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Attachment B - Stormwater management Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.