Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

2021-10-12 P&E Agenda - Item 10 - Attachment 1 - Social Return on Investment Evaluation

of 52

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

 Stakeholder list* – Digital Hub          Includes supporters and beneficiaries

      B.   Event/ program attendees – beneficiary stakeholders
      •    School age students – in person attendees
      •    Parents of school age students
      •    Primary and high school teachers, discipline coordinators
      •    Online attendees – specific events

      C.   Digital network
      •    ‘Members’ of the extended digital community who attend networking and professional development
           sessions at the digital hub (not necessary ‘members’ who work at the hub)

      D.   Funding agencies – financial contributor stakeholders
      •    Noosa Shire Council
      •    Queensland Government
      •    Commonwealth Government
      •    Sponsors, event financial supporters
      •    Angel investors

      E.   Specialist provider stakeholders
      •    Mentors
      •    Specialist and occasional providers – e.g., robotics engineers

*The stakeholder sectors are not mutually exclusive, as some individuals move across stakeholder types during their time at the
digital hub

A number of these stakeholders were directly involved in the calculation of this SROI. Stakeholders within the
A-C groups (above) completed surveys as part of this SROI evaluation.


5.0 Methodology – surveys
In addition to benchmarking and literature review, a stakeholder survey was designed for each of stakeholder
types A, B and C with consideration to the SROI methodology.

Other information was collected known to be important to Council, such as participant locality, and whether
survey respondents believed they could advance their skills and projects from the Noosa locality.

The surveys were structured to allow respondents to express values aligned with expected outcomes (e.g.,
improved support and ability to advance tech. products etc), but survey fields were also available to express no
value or benefit. This ensured the survey had no inherent bias to guide respondents to provide supportive
comments.

The survey also allowed respondents to skip questions to ensure they didn’t need to respond to a field of no
interest, in order to progress and complete the survey.




10
Log in to download the original file

2021-10-12 P&E Agenda - Item 10 - Attachment 1 - Social Return on Investment Evaluation(PDF, 1001KB).pdf · 1.0 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.