Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

2021-03-15 General Committee Agenda

of 80

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (11.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                  15 MARCH 2021


         than assumed in the TTM reports), in which case the traffic impacts on the broader
         network would be significant.
   The consultant has identified inconsistencies between the architectural plans and plans
   within the traffic report noting a variation in road widths. The architectural plans demonstrate
   3.5 – 4.0 metre widths in 2 locations on the site whereas the traffic report discusses two-way
   aisles. These narrow road widths are not supported with all internal roads requiring a
   minimum width of 6.0 metres with 2.0 metre verges on each side. Whilst these requirements
   could be conditioned it is noted that this will impact on the layout and likely reduce the
   applicant’s proposed yield.
   In terms of car parking it is noted that a double garage is provided to each residence and an
   additional 32 visitor spaces are provided with half of these located at the club house. This
   represents a shortfall of 30 visitor spaces. Whilst the applicant seeks to rely on car parking
   within the double garages to satisfy the visitor car parking requirement this is considered
   unreasonable as it is impractical to expect that residents of the dwelling will make their
   garage spaces available to visitors. The traffic report submitted with the application discusses
   visitor parking being permitted on the internal 6.0m wide roadway however it is noted that in
   the “Use of the Park – visitors” section of the “Special terms” document (part of the Site
   Agreement) specifies that visitors are not permitted to park anywhere other than in the
   designated visitor carparks.
   Furthermore, the location of the visitor car parking is unsuitable as it is not dispersed
   throughout the development to enable easy access for visitors visiting residents in their
   homes.
   Sufficient car parking has not been provided for the golf club house as 94 car spaces are
   proposed in lieu of the 103 spaces required to service the 308 patrons who can be
   accommodated in the restaurant, café, function room, golfers lounge and terrace areas. The
   shortfall in car parking is further exacerbated as the golf club house car park will also be used
   by patrons of the golf course.
   The application was also referred internally to the Infrastructure Planning Design and
   Delivery team seeking advice regarding external pathway connections and the specific
   Noosa Council bus stop infrastructure types. In regard to external footpath connections the
   design office has indicated that it would be desirable for a footpath connection extending
   from the proposed bus stop on the western side of Myall Street along the western side of
   Myall Street and connecting to the existing pathway network on the northern side of Ferrells
   Road. The alignment of the footpath would need to consider significant vegetation in Myall
   Street and 2 pram crossings in Ferrells Road. In regard to bus stop infrastructure types the
   design office have advised that due to the routes that an R1 type shelter would be required
   on both sides together with the associated infrastructure as required by Translink. Relevant
   conditions could be included to address these requirements.
   Acoustic:
   An acoustic report has been provided to establish traffic impacts to the development and to
   determine acoustic criteria for onsite activities. The report includes recommendations for
   acoustic barriers with a maximum height of 2.4 metres and building treatments to address
   traffic noise from Myall Street. The report concludes that if the golf clubhouse is proposed as
   a licensed premises, a detailed amplified music assessment will need to be conducted to
   determine the maximum allowable noise levels for any amplified entertainment, in
   accordance with Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation (OLGR) requirements. Given the
   applicant indicates the golf club house will be available for functions, it is reasonable to
   assume that the clubhouse will be licensed and therefore it is appropriate that a detailed
   assessment be undertaken as part of this application to determine the appropriate hours of
   operation and any limits on outdoor dining areas.




                                                                                    Page 47 of 80
Log in to download the original file

2021-03-15 General Committee Agenda(PDF, 11MB).pdf · 11.9 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.