Original source · versioned page text
Acid Sulfate Report
Attached to the e-mail Additional Items for Information Request - MCU17/0076 & OPW17/0224.
25 EDWARD STREET, NOOSAVILLE PROPOSED DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT maximum 250 mm thick (loose thickness) layers and be compacted by repeated rolling to achieve a dry density ratio of at least 95% of the maximum Dry Density Ratio (Standard Compaction method), or 70% of the Dry Density Index for cohesionless fills (e.g. sands). Confirmatory compaction testing must be carried out at regular intervals. Details for inspection and testing of fill are given in Australian Standard AS 3798-2007 Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and Residential Developments. We recommend placement of structural fill to Level 1 standard and Type 2 frequency per AS3798. 5.2 Building Foundations 5.2.1 Indicative Site Classification Site classifications for footing design are determined in accordance with AS 2870-2011 Residential Slabs and Footings, and depend on the depth of cut / fill undertaken at a site, variations in the natural soil profiles, and the reactivity of the in situ soil / rock and any imported fill materials. It is recommended that imported fill be non-reactive, inert material (e.g. roadbase type). Based on the results of the investigation, the site is classified as equivalent to Class ‘H1’ in accordance with AS 2870-2011 Residential Slabs and Footings. The estimated characteristic surface movement (‘ys’) due to volume change as a result of moisture content variations at this site is expected to be less than 10 mm (assuming non-reactive fill is placed). However, settlement from fill and building loads may be in the order of 30 mm to 40 mm (resulting from very loose to loose sand). It should be noted that the predicted order of movement is based on the existing soil profile (i.e. no cutting or filling), and moisture content changes within soils due to normal seasonal moisture variations only. 5.2.2 Footing Design It is our recommendation that the proposed residence and any associated structures (e.g. pool and retaining walls) should be supported on high level footings founding in future controlled (certified) fill. Conventional footings (beams, strip, pads) may be adopted, and be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 100 kPa. If higher bearing capacity is required, deeper footings will need to be installed. Due to the loose nature of the sands at this site, and in order to minimise ground vibrations, it is recommended that screw-in (helical) steel piles be adopted for deeper footings. Piles founded on the dense sand layer at a depth of 3 m to 3.5 m BGL may be designed using an allowable end bearing capacity of 300 kPa. Care must be taken so as not to penetrate through the dense layer. Piling companies must provide their own assessment of suitable pile types and capacity. All footings must also found such that they are not adversely affected by any adjacent excavations, batter slopes, trenches, or retaining walls that are not designed to support building loads (e.g. the existing sewer along the rear of the site). Footings should found at least below a plane extending 1m horizontally from the base of trenches/batter slopes/excavations/retaining walls, then rising up at 1V:1H, as illustrated in Text Figure 7 below. 25 August 2017 Report No. 17265-001-Rev0 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.