Original source · versioned page text
Att 3 - SDAP compliance
Attached to the e-mail Retail Bus Type 2 Shop & Salon, Multiple Housing Type 4 Conventional (2 units) & Boundary Realignment (3 lots into 3) - MCU18/0158 & RAL18/0017.
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment
Table 1.2.1: Development in a state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings and structures
PO1 The location of buildings, structures, AO1.1 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, Complies with AO – Only awnings
infrastructure, services and utilities does not services and utilities are not located in a state- proposed over footpaths and will not create
create a safety hazard in a state-controlled road, controlled road. a safety hazard.
or cause damage to, or obstruct road transport AND
infrastructure AO1.2 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, Complies with AO - Access arrangements
services and utilities can be maintained without improved to State road.
requiring access to a state-controlled road.
PO2 The design and construction of Buildings AO2.1 Facades of buildings and structures Able to comply with AO
and structures does not create a safety hazard facing a state-controlled road are made of non-
by distracting users of a state-controlled road. reflective materials.
OR
AO2.2 Facades of buildings and structures do Able to comply with AO
not reflect point light sources into the face of
oncoming traffic on a state-controlled road.
AND
AO2.3 External lighting of buildings and Able to comply with AO
structures is not directed into the face of
oncoming traffic on a state-controlled road and
does not involve flashing or laser lights.
AND
AO2.4 Advertising devices visible from a state- Able to comply with AO
controlled road are located and designed in
accordance with the Roadside advertising guide,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
Filling, excavation and retaining structures
PO4 Filling and excavation does not interfere No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO – No earthworks in road.
with, or result in damage to, infrastructure or
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 18 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response services in a state-controlled road. Note: Information on the location of services and public utility plants in a state-controlled road can be obtained from the Dial Before You Dig service. Where development will impact on an existing or future service or public utility plant in a state- controlled road such that the service or public utility plant will need to be relocated, the alternative alignment must comply with the standards and design specifications of the relevant service or public utility provider, and any costs of relocation are to be borne by the developer. PO5 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO – Only minor earthworks retaining structures do not undermine, or cause in road reserve associated with proposed subsidence of, a state-controlled road. awnings. Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided. PO6 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO – Only minor earthworks retaining structures do not cause ground water in road reserve associated with proposed disturbance in a state-controlled road. awnings. Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided. PO7 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting or fill No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO – No substantial compaction during construction of a earthworks required. development does not result in ground State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0 State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 19
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
movement or vibration impacts that would cause
damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road,
road transport infrastructure or road works.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in
accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And
Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO8 Development involving the haulage of fill, AO8.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material Complies with AO – No substantial
extracted material or excavated spoil material is not transported to or from the development earthworks required.
exceeding 10,000 tonnes per year does not site on a state-controlled road.
damage the pavement of a state-controlled road.
Note: It is recommended a pavement impact
assessment is provided in accordance with the Guide
to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO9 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO - Access arrangements
construction of vehicular access to a improved to State road.
development does not compromise the operation
or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure for
a state-controlled road.
PO10 Fill material used on a development site AO10.1 Fill material is free of contaminants Complies with AO – No substantial
does not result in contamination of a state- including acid sulfate content. earthworks required.
controlled road.
Note: Soils and rocks should be tested in accordance
with AS 1289.0 – Methods of testing soils for
engineering purposes and AS 4133.0-2005 –
Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes.
AND
AO10.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in Complies with AO – No substantial
accordance with the requirements of AS 1289.0 earthworks required.
2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 19
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO11 Filling and excavation does not cause AO11.1 Compaction of fill is carried out in Complies with AO – No substantial
wind-blown dust nuisance in a state-controlled accordance with the requirements of AS 1289.0 earthworks required.
road. 2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
AND
AO11.2 Dust suppression measures are used Complies with AO – No substantial
during filling and excavation activities such as earthworks required.
wind breaks or barriers and dampening of
ground surfaces.
Stormwater and drainage
PO12 Development does not result in an No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO - Access arrangements
actionable nuisance, or worsening of, improved to State road with associated
stormwater, flooding or drainage impacts in a stormwater improved with new curb and
state-controlled road. channelling to local roads.
PO13 Run-off from the development site is not AO13.1 Development does not create any new Complies with AO - Access arrangements
unlawfully discharged to a state-controlled road. points of discharge to a state-controlled road. improved to State road with associated
AND stormwater improved with new curb and
channelling to local roads.
AO13.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a Complies with AO - Access arrangements
lawful point of discharge. improved to State road with associated
stormwater improved with new curb and
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage channelling to local roads.
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply,
2013, provides further information on lawful points of
discharge.
AND
AO13.3 Development does not worsen the Complies with AO - Access arrangements
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge improved to State road with associated
to the state-controlled road. stormwater improved with new curb and
channelling to local roads.
PO14 Run-off from the development site during AO14.1 Run-off from the development site Complies with AO - Access arrangements
construction does not cause siltation of during construction is not discharged to improved to State road with associated
stormwater infrastructure affecting a state- stormwater infrastructure for a state-controlled stormwater improved with new curb and
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 19
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
controlled road. road. channelling to local roads.
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road
PO15 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road AO15.1 Development does not require new or Complies with AO – Number of accesses
that is a limited access road is consistent with changed access to a limited access road. reduced to nil. Access arrangements
government policy for the management of limited improved to State road.
access roads. Note: Limited access roads are declared by the
transport chief executive under section 54 of the
Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and are identified in
the DA mapping system.
OR
AO15.2 A new or changed access to a limited Complies with AO – Number of accesses
access road is consistent with the limited access reduced to nil. Access arrangements
policy for the state-controlled road. improved to State road.
Note: Limited access policies for limited access roads
declared under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994
can be obtained by contacting the relevant
Department of Transport and Main Roads regional
office.
AND
AO15.3 Where a new or changed access is for a Complies with AO – Number of accesses
service centre, access is consistent with the reduced to nil. Access arrangements
Service centre policy, Department of Transport improved to State road.
and Main Roads, 2013 and the Access policy for
roadside service centre facilities on limited
access roads, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013, and the Service centre strategy for
the state-controlled road.
Note: The Service centre policy, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013, Access policy for
roadside service centre facilities, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013 and the relevant
Service centre strategy for a state-controlled road can
be accessed by contacting the relevant Department of
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 19
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
PO16 The location and design of vehicular AO16.1 Vehicular access is provided from a Complies with AO – Number of accesses
access to a state-controlled road (including local government road. reduced to nil. Access arrangements
access to a limited access road) does not create improved to State road.
a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled
road or result in a worsening of operating OR all of the following acceptable outcomes Complies with AO – Number of accesses
conditions on a state-controlled road. apply: reduced to nil. Access arrangements
improved to State road.
Note: Where a new or changed access between the AO16.2 Vehicular access for the development is
premises and a state-controlled road is proposed, the consistent with the function and design of the
Department of Transport and Main Roads will need to state-controlled road.
assess the proposal to determine if the vehicular AND
access for the development is safe. An assessment
can be made by Department of Transport and Main AO16.3 Development does not require new or Complies with AO – Number of accesses
Roads as part of the development assessment changed access between the premises and the reduced to nil. Access arrangements
process and a decision under section 62 of Transport state-controlled road. improved to State road.
Infrastructure Act 1994 issued where sufficient
information is provided. Note: A decision under section 62 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 outlines the approved
conditions for use of an existing vehicular access to a
state-controlled road. Current section 62 decisions
can be obtained from the relevant Department of
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
AND
AO16.4 Use of any existing vehicular access to Complies with AO – Number of accesses
the development is consistent with a decision reduced to nil. Access arrangements
under section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure improved to State road.
Act 1994.
Note: The development which is the subject of the
application must be of an equivalent use and intensity
for which the section 62 approval was issued and the
section 62 approval must have been granted no more
than 5 years prior to the lodgement of the application.
AND
AO16.5 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to Complies with AO – Number of accesses
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so reduced to nil. Access arrangements
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 19
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
vehicles do not queue in a road intersection or improved to State road.
on the state-controlled road.
PO17 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road AO17.1 Vehicular access and associated road Complies with AO – Access to the State
or local government road (and associated road access works are not located within 5 metres of road to be removed and not interfere with
access works) are located and designed to not existing public passenger transport bus stop infrastructure.
damage or interfere with public passenger infrastructure.
transport infrastructure, public passenger AND
services or pedestrian or cycle access to public AO17.2 The location and design of vehicular Complies with AO – Access to the State
passenger transport infrastructure and public access for a development does not necessitate road to be removed and not interfere with
passenger services. the relocation of existing public passenger bus stop infrastructure.
transport infrastructure.
AND
AO17.3 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to Complies with AO – Access to the State
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so road to be removed and not interfere with
vehicles using a vehicular access do not obstruct bus stop infrastructure.
public passenger transport infrastructure and
public passenger services or obstruct pedestrian
or cycle access to public passenger transport
infrastructure and public passenger services.
AND
AO17.4 The normal operation of public Complies with AO – Access to the State
passenger transport infrastructure or public road to be removed and not interfere with
passenger services is not interrupted during bus stop infrastructure.
construction of the development.
Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road
PO18 The location and design of vehicular AO18.1 Vehicular access is located as far as Complies with AO – Access located as far
access to a local road within 100 metres of an possible from the state-controlled road as possible from the State road along Opal
intersection with a state-controlled road does not intersection. Street.
create a safety hazard for users of a state- AND
controlled road. AO18.2 Vehicular access is in accordance with Complies with AO
volume 3, parts, 3, 4 and 4A of the Road
Planning And Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
AND
AO18.3 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to Complies with AO
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 19
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so
vehicles do not queue in the intersection or on
the state-controlled road.
Planned upgrades
PO19 Development does not impede delivery of AO19.1 Development is not located on land Complies with AO – No planned upgrades
planned upgrades of state-controlled roads. identified by the Department of Transport and for this intersection identified on mapping.
Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of a
state-controlled road is identified in the DA mapping
system.
OR
AO19.2 Development is sited and designed so Complies with AO
that permanent buildings, structures,
infrastructure, services or utilities are not located
on land identified by the Department of Transport
and Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes Complies with AO
apply:
AO19.3 Structures and infrastructure located on
land identified by the Department of Transport
and Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road are able to be
readily relocated or removed without materially
affecting the viability or functionality of the
development.
AND
AO19.4 Vehicular access for the development is Complies with AO
consistent with the function and design of the
planned upgrade of the state-controlled road.
AND
AO19.5 Development does not involve filling and Complies with AO
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 19
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
excavation of, or material changes to, land
required for a planned upgrade to a state-
controlled road.
AND
AO19.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre- Complies with AO
development condition at the completion of the
use.
Network impacts
PO20 Development does not result in a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with AO
worsening of operating conditions on the state-
controlled road network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended that an
RPEQ certified traffic impact assessment is provided,
prepared in accordance with the Guide to Traffic
Impact Assessment, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017.
PO21 Development does not impose traffic AO21.1 The layout and design of the Complies with AO – no new accesses to
loadings on a state-controlled road which could development directs traffic generated by the State road and directs traffic to local road.
be accommodated on the local road network. development to the local road network.
PO22 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a AO22.1 Upgrade works required as a result of Complies with AO
state-controlled road are built in accordance with the development are designed and constructed
Queensland road design standards. in accordance with the Road planning and
design manual, 2nd edition, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
Note: Road works in a state-controlled road require
approval under section 33 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 before the works commence.
Table 1.2.2: Environmental emissions
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Noise
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 19
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Accommodation activities
PO23 Development involving an accommodation AO23.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Complies with AO – residential buildings
activity or land for a future accommodation provided which is designed, sited and orientated away from main road and can be
activity minimises noise intrusion from a state- constructed: finished with materials for noise attenuation.
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at
habitable rooms. all facades of the building envelope:
a. ≤60 dB(A) L 10 (18 hour) façade corrected
(measured L 90 (8 hour) free field between
10pm and 6am ≤40 dB(A))
b. ≤63 dB(A) L 10 (18 hour) façade corrected
(measured L 90 (8 hour) free field between
10pm and 6am >40 dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-
comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by
the local planning instrument or relevant building
regulations should be used.
In some instances the design of noise barriers and
mounds to achieve the noise criteria above the
ground floor may not be reasonable or practicable. In
these instances, any relaxation of the criteria is at the
discretion of the Department of Transport and Main
Roads.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 19
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO23.2 Buildings which include a habitable room
are setback the maximum distance possible from
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO23.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so Complies with AO – residential buildings
that habitable rooms are located furthest from a orientated away from main road and can be
state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal finished with materials for noise attenuation.
corridor.
AND
AO23.4 Buildings (other than a relevant Complies with AO – residential buildings
residential building or relocated building) are orientated away from main road and can be
designed and constructed using materials which finished with materials for noise attenuation.
ensure that habitable rooms meet the following
internal noise criteria:
1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over
24 hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
Habitable rooms of relevant residential buildings
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 19
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
located within a transport noise corridor must comply
with the Queensland Development Code MP4.4
Buildings in a transport noise corridor, Queensland
Government, 2015. Transport noise corridors are
mapped on the DA mapping system.
PO24 Development involving an accommodation AO24.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Complies with AO – residential buildings
activity or land for a future accommodation provided which is designed, sited and orientated away from main road and can be
activity minimises noise intrusion from a state- constructed: finished with materials for noise attenuation.
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in
outdoor spaces for passive recreation. outdoor spaces for passive recreation:
a. ≤57 dB(A) L 10 (18 hour) free field
(measured L 90 (18 hour) free field
between 6am and 12 midnight ≤45
dB(A))
b. ≤60 dB(A) L 10 (18 hour) free field
(measured L 90 (18 hour) free field
between 6am and 12 midnight >45
dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
OR
AO24.2 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor Complies with AO – residential buildings
space for passive recreation which is shielded orientated away from main road and can be
from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi- finished with materials for noise attenuation.
modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 19
Page 13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
AND
AO24.3 Each dwelling with a balcony directly Complies with AO – residential buildings
exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or orientated away from main road and can be
type 1 multi-modal corridor has a continuous finished with materials for noise attenuation.
solid gap-free balustrade (other than gaps
required for drainage purposes to comply with
the Building Code of Australia).
Child care centres
PO25 Development involving a: AO25.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is N/A
1. child care centre; or provided which is designed, sited and
2. educational establishment constructed:
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in indoor all facades of the building envelope:
education areas and indoor play areas. a. ≤58 dB(A) L 10 (1 hour) façade corrected
(maximum hour during normal opening
hours)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-
comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by
the local planning instrument or relevant building
regulations should be used.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes N/A
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 19
Page 14
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
apply:
AO25.2 Buildings which include indoor education
areas and indoor play areas are setback the
maximum distance possible from a state-
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor.
AND
AO25.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so N/A
that indoor
education areas and indoor play areas are
located furthest from the state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor.
AND
AO25.4 Buildings are designed and constructed N/A
using materials which ensure indoor education
areas and indoor play areas meet the following
internal noise criteria:
1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour
during opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report, prepared in accordance
with the State Development Assessment Provisions
Supporting Information – Community Amenity (Noise),
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013, is
provided.
PO26 Development involving a: AO26.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is N/A
1. child care centre; or provided which is designed, sited and
2. educational establishment constructed:
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 19
Page 15
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor each outdoor education area or outdoor play
education areas and outdoor play areas. area:
a. ≤63 dB(A) L 10 (12 hour) free field
(between 6am and 6pm)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
OR
AO26.2 Each outdoor education area and N/A
outdoor play area is shielded from noise
generated from a state-controlled road or type 1
multi-modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
Hospitals
PO27 Development involving a hospital AO27.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed N/A
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled using materials which ensure patient care areas
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in patient meet the following internal noise criteria:
care areas. 1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour
during opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 19
Page 16
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
Vibration
Hospitals
PO28 Development involving a hospital AO28.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed N/A
minimises vibration impacts from vehicles using to ensure vibration in the treatment area of a
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal patient care area does not exceed a vibration
corridor in patient care areas. dose value of 0.1m/s1.75.
AND
AO28.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed N/A
to ensure vibration in the ward area of a patient
care area does not exceed a vibration dose
value of 0.4m/s1.75.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
vibration assessment report is provided.
Air and light
PO29 Development involving an accommodation AO29.1 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor Complies with AO – residential buildings
activity minimises air quality impacts from a space for passive recreation which is shielded orientated away from main road and can be
state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi- finished with materials for noise attenuation.
corridor in outdoor spaces for passive recreation. modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
PO30 Development involving a: AO30.1 Each outdoor education area and Complies with AO – residential buildings
1. child care centre; or outdoor play area is shielded from a state- orientated away from main road and can be
2. educational establishment controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by finished with materials for noise atte Complies
minimises air quality impacts from a state- a building, solid gap-free fence, or other solid with AO – residential buildings orientated away
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in gap-free structure. from main road and can be finished with
outdoor education areas and outdoor play areas. materials for noise attenuation.nuation.
PO31 Development involving an accommodation AO31.1 Buildings for an accommodation activity
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 19
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
activity or hospital minimises lighting impacts or hospital are designed to minimise the number
from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi- of windows or transparent/translucent panels
modal corridor. facing a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor.
OR
AO31.2 Windows facing a state-controlled road Complies with AO – residential buildings
or type 1 multi-modal corridor include treatments orientated away from main road and can be
to block light from a state-controlled road or type finished with materials for noise attenuation.
1 multi-modal corridor.
Table 1.2.3: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO32 Development does not impede delivery of AO32.1 Development is not located in a future N/A
a future state-controlled road. state-controlled road.
OR
AO32.2 Development is sited and designed so N/A
that permanent buildings, structures,
infrastructure, services or utilities are not located
in a future state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes N/A
apply:
AO32.3 Structures and infrastructure located in a
future state-controlled road are able to be readily
relocated or removed without materially affecting
the viability or functionality of the development.
AND
AO32.4 Development does not involve filling and N/A
excavation of, or material changes to, a future
state-controlled road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 19
Page 18
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO32.5 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre-
development condition at the completion of the
use.
PO33 Vehicular access to a future state- AO33.1 Development does not require new or N/A
controlled road is located and designed to not changed access between the premises and a
create a safety hazard for users of a future state- future state-controlled road.
controlled road or result in a worsening of AND
operating conditions on a future state-controlled AO33.2 Vehicular access for the development is N/A
road. consistent with the function and design of the
future state-controlled road.
Note: Where a new or changed access between the
premises and a future state-controlled road is
proposed, the Department of Transport and Main
Roads will need to assess the proposal to determine
if the vehicular access for the development is safe. An
assessment can be made by Department of Transport
and Main Roads as part of the development
assessment process and a decision under section 62
of Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 issued where
sufficient information is provided.
PO34 Filling, excavation, building foundations No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
and retaining structures do not undermine, or
cause subsidence of, a future state-controlled
road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended that an
RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment is provided,
prepared in accordance with volume 3 of the Road
planning and design manual, 2nd edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
PO35 Fill material from a development site does AO35.1 Fill material is free of contaminants N/A
not result in contamination of land for a future including acid sulfate content.
state-controlled road.
Note: Soil and rocks should be tested in accordance
with AS1289 – Methods of testing soils for
engineering purposes and AS4133 2005 – Methods of
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 18 of 19
Page 19
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
testing rocks for engineering purposes.
AND
AO35.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in N/A
accordance with the requirements of AS1289.0
2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
PO36 Development does not result in an No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
actionable nuisance, or worsening of,
stormwater, flooding or drainage impacts in a
future state-controlled road.
PO37 Run-off from the development site is not AO37.1 Development does not create any new N/A
unlawfully discharged to a future state-controlled points of discharge to a future state-controlled
road. road.
AND
AO37.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a N/A
lawful point of discharge.
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply,
2013, provides further information on lawful points of
discharge.
AND
AO37.3 Development does not worsen the N/A
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge
to the future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 19 of 19