Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (16.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 JUNE 2019
Areas of Average Performance relative to importance
There are only 12 Responsibility Areas (out of the total of 41) (refer to Table 3) for which Council
has received an average score which is defined as having an Importance rating of at least 3.96
(on the border-line of ‘4’= ‘Important’) and Performance not more than 1.5% below or above
Average (where Average Performance is 74.59% - the (calculated) Average Total Performance
Index).
Table 3 – Average Performers
Responsibility Area Importance Performance Share of
Mean Rank Mean Rank Optimum
Community Development 3.96 27= 3.78 13= 75.7%
Environmental Controls 4.07 24= 3.78 13= 75.6%
Financial Management 4.50 1 3.77 14 75.4%
Informing the Community 4.29 8= 3.76 15 75.2%
Environment Protection & Conservation 4.10 22 3.73 16 74.6%
Quality of Elected Council 4.38 4 3.72 17 74.4%
Community Health 4.14 19 3.71 18= 74.3%
Quality of Councillor(s) Dealt with 4.15 18 3.71 18= 74.1%
Human Resources Management 4.09 23 3.70 19 74.0%
Managerial & Supervisory Officers 4.34 6= 3.68 21 73.6%
Revenue-raising 4.23 13 3.67 22 73.4%
Providing Leadership & Advocacy 4.29 8= 3.66 23 73.2%
*Responsibility Areas shown in shading were rated in ‘top ten in overall importance
Average Performers
Community Development 69.90%
75.7%
Environmental Controls 68.10%
75.6%
Financial Management 64.60%
75.4%
Informing the Community 66.60%
75.2%
Evironment Protection & Conservation 66.60%
74.6%
Quality of Elected Council 68.70%
74.4%
Community Health 72.30%
74.3%
Qualitiy of Councillor(s) Dealt with 67.40%
74.1%
Human Resources Management 67.00%
74.0%
Managerial & Supervisory Officers 67.20%
73.6%
Revenue-raising 63.70%
73.4%
Providing Leadership & Advocacy 64.40%
73.2%
56.0% 58.0% 60.0% 62.0% 64.0% 66.0% 68.0% 70.0% 72.0% 74.0% 76.0% 78.0%
LGAQ 2017 Noosa 2019
Page 106 of 109
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.