Original source · versioned page text
2015-06-29 General Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 29 JUNE 2015
5 CONTRACT 1415T036 MUNNA POINT BRIDGE REHABILITATION (DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION)
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Project Manager, Adam Britton
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/Projects (T1)/Noosa Parade Munna Point Bridge
ECM/Subject/Contracting/Tenders
Attachments Nil
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not Applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Project Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated
29 June 2015 and
A. Award Contract 1415T036 Munna Point Bridge Rehabilitation (Design and Construction) to
Marine and Civil Maintenance Pty Ltd for the lump sum amount of $2,490,380 subject to
Marine and Civil Maintenance Pty Ltd satisfactorily responding to Council’s request for
information regarding their tender;
B. Allocate funding of $1,627,005 from the renewal infrastructure emergent works allocation in
the first quarter budget review of 2015/16; and
C. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to agree on any remaining items requiring
clarification.
REPORT
Following a report to the Infrastructure and Services Committee dated 31 March 2015, Council
staff prepared tender documentation for the Munna Point Bridge Rehabilitation (Design and
Construction).
The public tender was issued on 18 April 2015 through LG Tender Box as a design and
construction tender. The tender scope was based on a reference design prepared by local
consulting engineers Tod Consulting with specific performance outcomes including the
requirement for the rehabilitation to extend the bridge life by 50 years.
The tender documentation was downloaded over 100 times comprising a mixture of contractors,
consultants and individuals. As the works are highly specialised it was expected that the number
of submissions would be significantly lower.
Upon close of tenders on 12 June 2015, thirteen submissions were received including four firms
offering a submission based on the Principal supplied reference design and their own alternative
design.
Page 25 of 28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.