Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Attachment 7C - Flora and Fauna Survey Assessment_Noosa Landfill - Revision 3

of 82

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                             Native Foresters



The timing of the survey is considered suitable for detecting the target EVNT listed plant
species, none of which are deciduous i.e. Acacia attenuata, Acacia baueri, Eucalyptus
conglomerata and Allocasuarina emuina.

Survey timing in January, March and April is considered suitable for detecting target Wallum
frog species, with widespread ephemeral ponding and localised flooding in the weeks
and/or months leading up to the surveys.

Monthly rainfall totals were above average for March and April 2019, but well-below average
during January and February of 2019, and the total rainfall for November 2018 -April 2019
was less than half the average for this period (Table 3). Rainfall, surface and groundwater
conditions during field surveys would likely differ from those in years with average or above-
average rainfall. Variation in faunal assemblages and population dynamics (distribution,
density and breeding season) are also likely to occur as a result of changes in weather
patterns (e.g. late onset of the 2019 wet season associated with late breeding season).

TABLE 3: Monthly rainfall totals at Eumundi from November 2018 to the end of April
2019.

                         Nov           Dec          Jan          Feb          Mar     Apr
 Date                                                                                              Total
                         2018          2018         2019         2019         2019    2019
 Monthly rainfall
                          31.1        167.8          7.0          93.6        281.0   181.0        761.5
 (mm)
 Average
 monthly rainfall        117.8        162.6         228.6        248.3         238    155         1150.3
 (mm)

Data sourced from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology via http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/
cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=136&p_display_type=dailyDataFile&p_startYear=2019&p_c
=-321278797&p_stn_num=040078.


2.2.6 Limitations of this study

Emphasis was placed on surveying listed threatened ecological communities, populations
and/or species that are considered likely to occur within the potential Impact Area and
likely to be affected by any ground or surface water alterations as a result of the creation
of Cells 2.3 and 2.4.

The timing of the survey was optimal for detection of Wallum frogs which were the target
species, expected to be impacted by changed groundwater hydrology. However, this is not
necessarily the ideal time to survey for all other species, unlikely to be impacted by
hydrological changes in the potential impact area.

The field assessment for non-target fauna employed passive techniques only (i.e. no live
trapping for mammals and reptiles). For a comprehensive assessment of species
presence/absence, particularly for cryptic or and nocturnal species such as small mammals
and fossorial reptiles, targeted species surveys in which a combination of Elliott traps,
Camera traps Herptile Funnel traps are required.




Noosa Landfill & Resource Recovery Centre – Fauna and Flora Assessment – Revision 3                      16
Log in to download the original file

Attachment 7C - Flora and Fauna Survey Assessment_Noosa Landfill - Revision 3.pdf · 8.3 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.