Original source · versioned page text
Appendix E - State Code 1 Template Response
Attached to the e-mail Commercial Business Type 2 Medical (Doctor's Practice) - MCU18/0195.
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment
Table 1.2.1: Development in a state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings and structures
PO1 The location of buildings, structures, AO1.1 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, Complies with AO1.1
infrastructure, services and utilities does not services and utilities are not located in a state- The proposed use is setback approximately 130
create a safety hazard in a state-controlled road, controlled road. metres from the State Controlled Road (Elm
or cause damage to, or obstruct road transport AND Street).
infrastructure AO1.2 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, Complies with AO1.2
services and utilities can be maintained without Maintenance of the existing building can
requiring access to a state-controlled road. continue to occur without access to the state
controlled road.
PO2 The design and construction of Buildings AO2.1 Facades of buildings and structures Complies with AO2.1
and structures does not create a safety hazard facing a state-controlled road are made of non- The proposed building is considered to be
by distracting users of a state-controlled road. reflective materials. generously setback from the state controlled
OR road and does not feature reflective surfaces.
AO2.2 Facades of buildings and structures do Complies with AO2.1
not reflect point light sources into the face of The proposed building is considered to be
oncoming traffic on a state-controlled road. generously setback from the state controlled
AND road and does not feature reflective surfaces.
AO2.3 External lighting of buildings and Complies with AO2.3
structures is not directed into the face of No external lighting facing the state controlled
oncoming traffic on a state-controlled road and road is proposed.
does not involve flashing or laser lights.
AND
AO2.4 Advertising devices visible from a state- Not Applicable – the application does not
controlled road are located and designed in include an advertising device
accordance with the Roadside advertising guide,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
PO3 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges over AO3.1 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges Not Applicable – it is considered given the
a state-controlled road are designed and over a state-controlled road include throw minor nature of the proposal no upgrades to
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Appendix E - State Code 1 Template Response.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 18 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
constructed to prevent projectiles from being protection screens in accordance with section roads will be required.
thrown onto a state-controlled road. 4.9.3 of the Design criteria for bridges and other
structures manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2014.
Filling, excavation and retaining structures
PO4 Filling and excavation does not interfere No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable – the application does not
with, or result in damage to, infrastructure or involve filling or excavating
services in a state-controlled road.
Note: Information on the location of services and
public utility plants in a state-controlled road can be
obtained from the Dial Before You Dig service.
Where development will impact on an existing or
future service or public utility plant in a state-
controlled road such that the service or public utility
plant will need to be relocated, the alternative
alignment must comply with the standards and design
specifications of the relevant service or public utility
provider, and any costs of relocation are to be borne
by the developer.
PO5 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO5 – the application proposed
retaining structures do not undermine, or cause to retain the existing Sales Office building. The
subsidence of, a state-controlled road. building is considered generously setback from
the state controlled road (approximately 130
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this metres).
performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in
accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And
Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO6 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable – no groundwater disturbance
retaining structures do not cause ground water will occur as a resort of the proposed
disturbance in a state-controlled road. development
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 19
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in
accordance with Volume 3 of the Road planning and
design manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO7 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting or fill No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
compaction during construction of a required.
development does not result in ground
movement or vibration impacts that would cause
damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road,
road transport infrastructure or road works.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in
accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And
Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO8 Development involving the haulage of fill, AO8.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
extracted material or excavated spoil material is not transported to or from the development site required.
exceeding 10,000 tonnes per year does not on a state-controlled road.
damage the pavement of a state-controlled road.
Note: It is recommended a pavement impact
assessment is provided in accordance with the Guide
to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO9 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
construction of vehicular access to a required.
development does not compromise the operation
or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure for
a state-controlled road.
PO10 Fill material used on a development site AO10.1 Fill material is free of contaminants Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
does not result in contamination of a state- including acid sulfate content. required.
controlled road.
Note: Soils and rocks should be tested in accordance
with AS 1289.0 – Methods of testing soils for
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 19
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
engineering purposes and AS 4133.0-2005 –
Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes.
AND
AO10.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
accordance with the requirements of AS 1289.0 required.
2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
PO11 Filling and excavation does not cause AO11.1 Compaction of fill is carried out in Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
wind-blown dust nuisance in a state-controlled accordance with the requirements of AS 1289.0 required.
road. 2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
AND
AO11.2 Dust suppression measures are used Not Applicable – no earthworks are proposed or
during filling and excavation activities such as required.
wind breaks or barriers and dampening of
ground surfaces.
Stormwater and drainage
PO12 Development does not result in an No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable – no change to existing
actionable nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater and drainage will occur as a result of
stormwater, flooding or drainage impacts in a the proposed development
state-controlled road.
PO13 Run-off from the development site is not AO13.1 Development does not create any new Not Applicable – no change to existing
unlawfully discharged to a state-controlled road. points of discharge to a state-controlled road. stormwater and drainage will occur as a result of
AND the proposed development
AO13.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a Not Applicable – no change to existing
lawful point of discharge. stormwater and drainage will occur as a result of
the proposed development
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply,
2013, provides further information on lawful points of
discharge.
AND
AO13.3 Development does not worsen the Not Applicable – no change to existing
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge stormwater and drainage will occur as a result of
to the state-controlled road. the proposed development
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 19
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO14 Run-off from the development site during AO14.1 Run-off from the development site Not Applicable – no change to existing
construction does not cause siltation of during construction is not discharged to stormwater and drainage will occur as a result of
stormwater infrastructure affecting a state- stormwater infrastructure for a state-controlled the proposed development
controlled road. road.
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road
PO15 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road AO15.1 Development does not require new or Not Applicable – the proposed development will
that is a limited access road is consistent with changed access to a limited access road. utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
government policy for the management of limited
access roads. Note: Limited access roads are declared by the
transport chief executive under section 54 of the
Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and are identified in
the DA mapping system.
OR
AO15.2 A new or changed access to a limited Not Applicable – the proposed development will
access road is consistent with the limited access utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
policy for the state-controlled road.
Note: Limited access policies for limited access roads
declared under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994
can be obtained by contacting the relevant
Department of Transport and Main Roads regional
office.
AND
AO15.3 Where a new or changed access is for a Not Applicable – the proposed development will
service centre, access is consistent with the utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
Service centre policy, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013 and the Access policy for
roadside service centre facilities on limited
access roads, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013, and the Service centre strategy for
the state-controlled road.
Note: The Service centre policy, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013, Access policy for
roadside service centre facilities, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013 and the relevant
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 19
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Service centre strategy for a state-controlled road can
be accessed by contacting the relevant Department of
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
PO16 The location and design of vehicular AO16.1 Vehicular access is provided from a Complies with AO16.1
access to a state-controlled road (including local government road. The proposed development will utilise the
access to a limited access road) does not create existing access off Pearsons Road.
a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled OR all of the following acceptable outcomes Not Applicable – the proposed development will
road or result in a worsening of operating apply: utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
conditions on a state-controlled road.
AO16.2 Vehicular access for the development is
Note: Where a new or changed access between the consistent with the function and design of the
premises and a state-controlled road is proposed, the state-controlled road.
Department of Transport and Main Roads will need to AND
assess the proposal to determine if the vehicular
AO16.3 Development does not require new or Not Applicable – the proposed development will
access for the development is safe. An assessment
can be made by Department of Transport and Main changed access between the premises and the utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
Roads as part of the development assessment state-controlled road.
process and a decision under section 62 of Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 issued where sufficient Note: A decision under section 62 of the Transport
information is provided. Infrastructure Act 1994 outlines the approved
conditions for use of an existing vehicular access to a
state-controlled road. Current section 62 decisions
can be obtained from the relevant Department of
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
AND
AO16.4 Use of any existing vehicular access to Not Applicable – the proposed development will
the development is consistent with a decision utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
under section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure
Act 1994.
Note: The development which is the subject of the
application must be of an equivalent use and intensity
for which the section 62 approval was issued and the
section 62 approval must have been granted no more
than 5 years prior to the lodgement of the application.
AND
AO16.5 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to Not Applicable – the proposed development will
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 19
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
vehicles do not queue in a road intersection or
on the state-controlled road.
PO17 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road AO17.1 Vehicular access and associated road Not Applicable – the proposed development will
or local government road (and associated road access works are not located within 5 metres of utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
access works) are located and designed to not existing public passenger transport
damage or interfere with public passenger infrastructure.
transport infrastructure, public passenger AND
services or pedestrian or cycle access to public AO17.2 The location and design of vehicular Not Applicable – the proposed development will
passenger transport infrastructure and public access for a development does not necessitate utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
passenger services. the relocation of existing public passenger
transport infrastructure.
AND
AO17.3 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to Not Applicable – the proposed development will
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
vehicles using a vehicular access do not obstruct
public passenger transport infrastructure and
public passenger services or obstruct pedestrian
or cycle access to public passenger transport
infrastructure and public passenger services.
AND
AO17.4 The normal operation of public Not Applicable – the proposed development will
passenger transport infrastructure or public utilise the existing access off Pearsons Road.
passenger services is not interrupted during
construction of the development.
Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road
PO18 The location and design of vehicular AO18.1 Vehicular access is located as far as Complies with AO18.1 – existing access is
access to a local road within 100 metres of an possible from the state-controlled road setback approximately 130 meters from the State
intersection with a state-controlled road does not intersection. Controlled intersection.
create a safety hazard for users of a state- AND
controlled road. AO18.2 Vehicular access is in accordance with Not Applicable – access is existing
volume 3, parts, 3, 4 and 4A of the Road
Planning And Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 19
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO18.3 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to Not Applicable – access is existing
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so
vehicles do not queue in the intersection or on
the state-controlled road.
Planned upgrades
PO19 Development does not impede delivery of AO19.1 Development is not located on land Complies with AO19.1
planned upgrades of state-controlled roads. identified by the Department of Transport and The subject site is not located on land required
Main Roads as land required for the planned for an upgrade
upgrade of a state-controlled road.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of a
state-controlled road is identified in the DA mapping
system.
OR
AO19.2 Development is sited and designed so Not Applicable – The use will utilise an existing
that permanent buildings, structures, building on site
infrastructure, services or utilities are not located
on land identified by the Department of Transport
and Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes Not Applicable – The use will utilise an existing
apply: building on site
AO19.3 Structures and infrastructure located on
land identified by the Department of Transport
and Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road are able to be
readily relocated or removed without materially
affecting the viability or functionality of the
development.
AND
AO19.4 Vehicular access for the development is Not Applicable – The use will utilise existing
consistent with the function and design of the vehicular access and parking
planned upgrade of the state-controlled road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 19
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO19.5 Development does not involve filling and Not Applicable
excavation of, or material changes to, land
required for a planned upgrade to a state-
controlled road.
AND
AO19.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre- Not Applicable
development condition at the completion of the
use.
Network impacts
PO20 Development does not result in a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable
worsening of operating conditions on the state-
controlled road network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended that an
RPEQ certified traffic impact assessment is provided,
prepared in accordance with the Guide to Traffic
Impact Assessment, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017.
PO21 Development does not impose traffic AO21.1 The layout and design of the Complies with AO21.1
loadings on a state-controlled road which could development directs traffic generated by the The development is located and accessed via
be accommodated on the local road network. development to the local road network. the local road network
PO22 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a AO22.1 Upgrade works required as a result of Not Applicable
state-controlled road are built in accordance with the development are designed and constructed
Queensland road design standards. in accordance with the Road planning and
design manual, 2nd edition, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
Note: Road works in a state-controlled road require
approval under section 33 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 before the works commence.
Table 1.2.2: Environmental emissions
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 19
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Noise
Accommodation activities
PO23 Development involving an accommodation AO23.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Not Applicable
activity or land for a future accommodation provided which is designed, sited and
activity minimises noise intrusion from a state- constructed:
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at
habitable rooms. all facades of the building envelope:
a. ≤60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) façade corrected
(measured L90 (8 hour) free field between
10pm and 6am ≤40 dB(A))
b. ≤63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) façade corrected
(measured L90 (8 hour) free field between
10pm and 6am >40 dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-
comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by
the local planning instrument or relevant building
regulations should be used.
In some instances the design of noise barriers and
mounds to achieve the noise criteria above the
ground floor may not be reasonable or practicable. In
these instances, any relaxation of the criteria is at the
discretion of the Department of Transport and Main
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 19
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Roads.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO23.2 Buildings which include a habitable room
are setback the maximum distance possible from
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO23.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so Not Applicable
that habitable rooms are located furthest from a
state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO23.4 Buildings (other than a relevant Not Applicable
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials which
ensure that habitable rooms meet the following
internal noise criteria:
1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over
24 hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 19
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Habitable rooms of relevant residential buildings
located within a transport noise corridor must comply
with the Queensland Development Code MP4.4
Buildings in a transport noise corridor, Queensland
Government, 2015. Transport noise corridors are
mapped on the DA mapping system.
PO24 Development involving an accommodation AO24.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Not Applicable
activity or land for a future accommodation provided which is designed, sited and
activity minimises noise intrusion from a state- constructed:
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in
outdoor spaces for passive recreation. outdoor spaces for passive recreation:
a. ≤57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field
(measured L90 (18 hour) free field
between 6am and 12 midnight ≤45
dB(A))
b. ≤60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field
(measured L90 (18 hour) free field
between 6am and 12 midnight >45
dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
OR
AO24.2 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor Not Applicable
space for passive recreation which is shielded
from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 19
Page 13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
AND
AO24.3 Each dwelling with a balcony directly Not Applicable
exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor has a continuous
solid gap-free balustrade (other than gaps
required for drainage purposes to comply with
the Building Code of Australia).
Child care centres
PO25 Development involving a: AO25.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Not Applicable
1. child care centre; or provided which is designed, sited and
2. educational establishment constructed:
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in indoor all facades of the building envelope:
education areas and indoor play areas. a. ≤58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) façade corrected
(maximum hour during normal opening
hours)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-
comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by
the local planning instrument or relevant building
regulations should be used.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 19
Page 14
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO25.2 Buildings which include indoor education
areas and indoor play areas are setback the
maximum distance possible from a state-
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor.
AND
AO25.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so Not Applicable
that indoor
education areas and indoor play areas are
located furthest from the state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor.
AND
AO25.4 Buildings are designed and constructed Not Applicable
using materials which ensure indoor education
areas and indoor play areas meet the following
internal noise criteria:
1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour
during opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report, prepared in accordance
with the State Development Assessment Provisions
Supporting Information – Community Amenity (Noise),
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013, is
provided.
PO26 Development involving a: AO26.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Not Applicable
1. child care centre; or provided which is designed, sited and
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 19
Page 15
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2. educational establishment constructed:
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor each outdoor education area or outdoor play
education areas and outdoor play areas. area:
a. ≤63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field
(between 6am and 6pm)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
OR
AO26.2 Each outdoor education area and Not Applicable
outdoor play area is shielded from noise
generated from a state-controlled road or type 1
multi-modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
Hospitals
PO27 Development involving a hospital AO27.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed Not Applicable
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled using materials which ensure patient care areas
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in patient meet the following internal noise criteria:
care areas. 1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour
during opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 19
Page 16
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
Vibration
Hospitals
PO28 Development involving a hospital AO28.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed Not Applicable
minimises vibration impacts from vehicles using to ensure vibration in the treatment area of a
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal patient care area does not exceed a vibration
corridor in patient care areas. dose value of 0.1m/s1.75.
AND
AO28.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed Not Applicable
to ensure vibration in the ward area of a patient
care area does not exceed a vibration dose
value of 0.4m/s1.75.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
vibration assessment report is provided.
Air and light
PO29 Development involving an accommodation AO29.1 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor Not Applicable
activity minimises air quality impacts from a space for passive recreation which is shielded
state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
corridor in outdoor spaces for passive recreation. modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
PO30 Development involving a: AO30.1 Each outdoor education area and Not Applicable
1. child care centre; or outdoor play area is shielded from a state-
2. educational establishment controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by
minimises air quality impacts from a state- a building, solid gap-free fence, or other solid
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in gap-free structure.
outdoor education areas and outdoor play areas.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 19
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO31 Development involving an accommodation AO31.1 Buildings for an accommodation activity Not Applicable
activity or hospital minimises lighting impacts or hospital are designed to minimise the number
from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi- of windows or transparent/translucent panels
modal corridor. facing a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor.
OR
AO31.2 Windows facing a state-controlled road Not Applicable
or type 1 multi-modal corridor include treatments
to block light from a state-controlled road or type
1 multi-modal corridor.
Table 1.2.3: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO32 Development does not impede delivery of AO32.1 Development is not located in a future Complies with AO32.1
a future state-controlled road. state-controlled road. The proposed development is not located in a
OR future state controlled road
AO32.2 Development is sited and designed so Not Applicable – The proposed use is
that permanent buildings, structures, temporary
infrastructure, services or utilities are not located
in a future state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes Not Applicable – no structures are located
apply: within a future state controlled road
AO32.3 Structures and infrastructure located in a
future state-controlled road are able to be readily
relocated or removed without materially affecting
the viability or functionality of the development.
AND
AO32.4 Development does not involve filling and Not Applicable – The proposed development
excavation of, or material changes to, a future will make no changes to the state controlled
state-controlled road. road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 19
Page 18
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO32.5 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre- Not Applicable
development condition at the completion of the
use.
PO33 Vehicular access to a future state- AO33.1 Development does not require new or Complies with AO33.1
controlled road is located and designed to not changed access between the premises and a No changes to access are proposed
create a safety hazard for users of a future state- future state-controlled road.
controlled road or result in a worsening of AND
operating conditions on a future state-controlled AO33.2 Vehicular access for the development is Complies with AO33.2
road. consistent with the function and design of the No changes to access are proposed
future state-controlled road.
Note: Where a new or changed access between the
premises and a future state-controlled road is
proposed, the Department of Transport and Main
Roads will need to assess the proposal to determine
if the vehicular access for the development is safe. An
assessment can be made by Department of Transport
and Main Roads as part of the development
assessment process and a decision under section 62
of Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 issued where
sufficient information is provided.
PO34 Filling, excavation, building foundations No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO34
and retaining structures do not undermine, or No changes to access are proposed
cause subsidence of, a future state-controlled
road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended that an
RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment is provided,
prepared in accordance with volume 3 of the Road
planning and design manual, 2nd edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
PO35 Fill material from a development site does AO35.1 Fill material is free of contaminants Not Applicable – no filling is required or
not result in contamination of land for a future including acid sulfate content. proposed
state-controlled road.
Note: Soil and rocks should be tested in accordance
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 18 of 19
Page 19
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
with AS1289 – Methods of testing soils for
engineering purposes and AS4133 2005 – Methods of
testing rocks for engineering purposes.
AND
AO35.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in Not Applicable – no filling is required or
accordance with the requirements of AS1289.0 proposed
2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
PO36 Development does not result in an No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not Applicable – no filling is required or
actionable nuisance, or worsening of, proposed
stormwater, flooding or drainage impacts in a
future state-controlled road.
PO37 Run-off from the development site is not AO37.1 Development does not create any new Complies with AO37.1
unlawfully discharged to a future state-controlled points of discharge to a future state-controlled No changes to existing runoff will occur as a
road. road. result of the development
AND
AO37.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a Complies with AO37.2
lawful point of discharge. No changes to existing runoff will occur as a
result of the development
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply,
2013, provides further information on lawful points of
discharge.
AND
AO37.3 Development does not worsen the Complies with AO37.3
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge No changes to existing runoff will occur as a
to the future state-controlled road. result of the development
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 19 of 19