Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix E - State Code 1 Template Response

Attached to the e-mail Commercial Business Type 2 Medical (Doctor's Practice) - MCU18/0195.

of 19
 Performance outcomes                                       Acceptable outcomes                                  Response
 constructed to prevent projectiles from being              protection screens in accordance with section        roads will be required.
 thrown onto a state-controlled road.                       4.9.3 of the Design criteria for bridges and other
                                                            structures manual, Department of Transport and
                                                            Main Roads, 2014.
 Filling, excavation and retaining structures
 PO4 Filling and excavation does not interfere              No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                 Not Applicable – the application does not
 with, or result in damage to, infrastructure or                                                                 involve filling or excavating
 services in a state-controlled road.

 Note: Information on the location of services and
 public utility plants in a state-controlled road can be
 obtained from the Dial Before You Dig service.

 Where development will impact on an existing or
 future service or public utility plant in a state-
 controlled road such that the service or public utility
 plant will need to be relocated, the alternative
 alignment must comply with the standards and design
 specifications of the relevant service or public utility
 provider, and any costs of relocation are to be borne
 by the developer.
 PO5 Filling, excavation, building foundations and          No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                 Complies with PO5 – the application proposed
 retaining structures do not undermine, or cause                                                                 to retain the existing Sales Office building. The
 subsidence of, a state-controlled road.                                                                         building is considered generously setback from
                                                                                                                 the state controlled road (approximately 130
 Note: To demonstrate compliance with this                                                                       metres).
 performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
 certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in
 accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And
 Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport
 and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
 PO6 Filling, excavation, building foundations and          No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                 Not Applicable – no groundwater disturbance
 retaining structures do not cause ground water                                                                  will occur as a resort of the proposed
 disturbance in a state-controlled road.                                                                         development

 Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
 performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment                                                                              Page 2 of 19

Log in to download the original (Appendix E - State Code 1 Template Response.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.