Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0056 Response to SARA - Consulting Report

of 321

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (24.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Original PDF page 79, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
                   All regulated waste must only be removed from the premises by a licensed waste transport
                    contractor and disposed of at a licensed waste treatment facility. Receipts for the transport and
                    disposal of the waste must be retained and made available to any authorised Council officer upon
                    request.

          This report aims to response to these potential concerns and demonstrate that all the runoff from the high
          risk area is treated with the SPEL Puraceptor. Moreover the effluent water quality from the SPEL
          Puraceptor matches the required conditions outlined by the Noosa Regional Council.


          1.2       Scope of Work
          The scope of work was developed in reference to the concerns raised by the Noosa Regional Council and
          the request from the vT Consulting Engineers will include the following:
                   A plan showing high & low risk areas.
                   A site based risk assessment to demonstrate that the proposed SPEL is equivalent or better than
                    the conditioned set up of a blind sump and GPT.


          1.3       Executive Summary
          The detail of calculations are shown in Chapter 3 of this report, however it can be summarised here that
          based on the 538m2 of forecourt and the corresponding rainfall intensity of 6 minutes duration for a 20 year
          ARI event, the runoff to the SPEL Puraceptor would be 31.8L/s. The proposed designed Puraceptor has a
          treatment flow rate of 50L/s. The spill containment capacity of the designed SPEL Puraceptor is 10,000L.
          Therefore in the event that a spill was to occur, the Puraceptor has well and thoroughly enough capacity to
          prevent any catastrophe and hence does comply with Noosa Regional Council requirements. These points
          are all more elaborated in the site based assessment section in chapter 3.




HEAD OFFICE                    POSTAL                        EMAIL                          ABN                          spel.com.au
100 Silverwater Road           PO BOX 7138                   [email protected]              83 151 832 629
Silverwater NSW 2128           Silverwater NSW 2128
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0056 Response to SARA - Consulting Report.pdf · 24.7 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.