Original source · versioned page text
2021-07-06 Services & Organisation Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 JULY 2021
Page 34 of 42
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 JULY 2021
Approximately 450 infrastructure projects have been
recommended for implementation. A scoring system was
developed to assist with determining project priority.
Projects were prioritised based on criteria aimed at
“getting more people riding a bike or walking’ and
“achieving value for money”. Project feasibility was also
considered.
Routes requiring a higher priority
The criteria and scoring system was developed in
The following routes/areas should be givena consultation with the Project Reference Group (PRG).
higher priority: Proximity to schools was one of the higher weighted
criteria.
e Between Lake Cooroibah and Tewantin
e Between Elanda Point and Tewantin via Whilst this may not always be the case, it is expected
Boreen Point that the greater the population and activity in an area,
e Around Lake Doonella, Tewantin the more likely infrastructure will be used. As a result,
e Between Shields Street and Doonella many of the higher scoring projects are located in areas
Street, Tewantin where population densities are higher and there are
e Between Lake Macdonald, and Cooroy more destinations such as activity centres, schools,
e Those in less populated areas such as sport and recreation facilities.
along Sunrise Road, Tinbeerwah
e Around schools Estimated project costs, as well as current forecast 2023
e Pomona — Projects 39, 40 and 41 (Cooran to 2030 Council spending on pathway and boardwalk
to Pomona) fall into priority band 201-300. upgrades or expansions, were key factors considered
What does this banding mean? when identifying the priority projects in the
e Peregian Beach to Peregian Breeze link implementation plan.
(feedback received through letters from
Community Groups) Importantly, if further funding is secured, or project costs
are lower than estimated, additional projects could be
completed.
Projects 39, 40 and 41, were identified as falling within
the 201-300 project priority band. Projects within the 1-
25, 26-50 band have a higher priority and will likely be
delivered first. Projects 39, 40 and 41 scored low in the
prioritisation process but will be investigated further as
part of the Detailed Trail Masterplan and Implementation
Plan project currently underway. Refer also Hinterland
town connectivity improvements section below.
Page 34 of 42See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.