Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 S&O Committee Agenda - Item 19 - Attachment 1 - Community Satisfaction Survey Noosa Shire Council 2019
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Areas of Average Performance
There are only 12 Responsibility Areas (out of the total of 41) on which Council has received an
average score which is defined as having;
an Importance rating of at least 3.96 (on the border-line of ‘4’= ‘Important’), and
Performance not more than 1.5% below or above Average (where Average
Performance 74.59% - the (calculated) Average Total Performance Index).
Responsibility Area Importance Performance Share of
Mean Rank Mean Rank Optimum
Community Development 3.96 27= 3.78 13= 75.7%
Environmental Controls 4.07 24= 3.78 13= 75.6%
Financial Management 4.50 1 3.77 14 75.4%
Informing the Community 4.29 8= 3.76 15 75.2%
Environment Protection & 4.10 22 3.73 16 74.6%
Conservation
Quality of Elected Council 4.38 4 3.72 17 74.4%
Community Health 4.14 19 3.71 18= 74.3%
Quality of Councillor(s) 4.15 18 3.71 18= 74.1%
Dealt with
Human Resources 4.09 23 3.70 19 74.0%
Management
Managerial & Supervisory 4.34 6= 3.68 21 73.6%
Officers
Revenue-raising 4.23 13 3.67 22 73.4%
Providing Leadership & 4.29 8= 3.66 23 73.2%
Advocacy
*Responsibility Areas shown in shading were rated in ‘top ten’ in overall importance
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2019
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 20
Document Set ID: 20874398
Version: 1, Version Date: 31/05/2019
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.