Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 S&O Committee Agenda - Item 19 - Attachment 1 - Community Satisfaction Survey Noosa Shire Council 2019
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
COMMUNITY RATINGS OF COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITY AREAS (THEMES)
This section comprises two sets of tables and commentary:
the first set of tables deals with the community’s priorities - the IMPORTANCE of each
Area of Responsibility/Service;
the second set of tables deals with the community’s perceptions of what is actually the
case - the ratings for COUNCIL PERFORMANCE in each Area of Responsibility / Service.
N.B. In the following tables, the Responsibility Areas being rated are presented in the order of
consideration by respondents, not in rank order of Importance or Performance.
Explanation of Importance & Performance Ratings
In the tables, the MEAN column or row is an average of the IMPORTANCE or PERFORMANCE
ratings given by all respondents, using 5-point scales with clarifying semantic differentials as
follows:
IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE
Crucial (5) Very Good (5)
Important (4) Good (4)
Nice to Have (3) Fair Only (3)
Unimportant (2) Poor (2)
Quite Unimportant (1) Very Poor (1)
In both measurements, provision was also made for unprompted ‘Don't Know’ or ‘Not
Applicable’ responses. These were factored out of the calculations by giving them a
value = 0.
While the words used in the Performance Scales each have an obvious meaning, those used in
the Importance Scales were explained in detail to all respondents by the interviewers:
‘Crucial’ means that it is a service or activity that the community must have and that it
is vital for the Council either to do or to get involved in to make sure that it is done by
someone.
‘Important’ is for something that you certainly expect your Council to do, provide or
make sure that somebody else provides it.
‘Nice to Have’ means just that, as does ‘Not Very Important’.
‘Quite Unimportant’ means unnecessary - something that in any Council cutbacks
would be the first to go.
Achieved MEAN scores should thus be considered in relation to the scale being applied. For
example:
a MEAN of 4.5 on Importance indicates that the particular responsibility/quality is
adjudged mid-way between Important and Crucial.
a MEAN of 3.5 for Performance means that the Council is seen as mid-way between
Fair Only and Good in being effective/delivering service on that particular criterion.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2019
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 28
Document Set ID: 20874398
Version: 1, Version Date: 31/05/2019
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.