Original source · versioned page text
2020-07-16 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 5 - Final Noosa Plan 2020 Part 8-10 Schedules & Appendix
The original of this document is very large (19.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes
Stormwater drainage infrastructure is colocated with other
infrastructure within a combined utility corridor where appropriate.
AO5.3
Temporary vehicular crossings of waterways must be designed
and constructed to be consistent with the current International
Erosion Control Association Best Practice Book Series.
Stormwater quality and protection of receiving waters Table 9.4.8.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes
Stormwater quality and protection of receiving waters
PO6 AO6.1
Development is located, designed, constructed and operated to Stormwater runoff discharging into High Ecological Value waters
protect and enhance environmental values and water quality of as a result of development causes no increase in gross
waterways, wetlands, lakes, ground waters and drainage pollutants, total suspended solids, total phosphorous or total
systems. nitrogen compared to a predevelopment scenario.
AND
Editor’s note: Environmental values of waters and water quality
objectives are prescribed in Schedule 1 of the Environmental AO6.2
Protection (Water) Policy 2009 and are identified on the State All stormwater runoff is treated to achieve maximum removal of
Planning Policy Interactive Mapping System. nutrients, gross pollutants and suspended solids as determined
by cost to efficiency ratios. (e.g. bioretention basins must be sized
to achieve at least 80% reduction in total suspended solids, 60%
reduction in total phosphorous, 45% reduction in total nitrogen
and 90% reduction in gross pollutants >5mm).
OR
AO6.3
Developments achieve a minimum 3 drop rating consistent with
the Water by Design Living Waterways Scoring Guide (Healthy
Land and Water).
Editor’s note— PSP6 Engineering Design Standards Roads,
Drainage and Earthworks provides guidance on stormwater
design and modelling requirements.
PO7 AO7.1
Water quality treatment systems use natural processes and Water quality treatment systems are designed to be integrated
materials, whenever possible, and are integrated into into the landscape consistent with the technical design guideline
development to enhance biodiversity and landscape benefits. published by Healthy Land and Water Water by Design for the
feature. (eg. For Bioretention Basins: Bioretention Technical
Design Guidelines (October 2014) and for Wetland Systems the
Wetland Technical Design Guideline (May 2017).
PO8 AO8.1
Water quality treatment infrastructure to be dedicated as Detailed life cycle costing is provided for the entire treatment train
public assets are proven to be suitable for its use and of a system including replacement costs of asset parts.
cost effective and efficient standard.
AO8.2 Treatment systems dedicated as public assets are
designed to minimise maintenance, renewal and adaption costs
and the requirement for specialised equipment, material or
maintenance techniques.
AO8.3
Vegetated stormwater management systems to be dedicated as
NOOSA PLAN 2020 Page 116 of 150
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.