Council archive · source document
Volume 2 - Code Responses · 132006.823
COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 ASSESSMENT
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS (if code assessable)
O4 S4.1 Complies with specific outcome.
On-site detention does not adversely impact on No solution provided. The collection and reuse of roofwater is from the
water requirements downstream of the site where villa units only. This will have no impact on
the water is required to sustain the ecology and downstream water systems. The run-off that is
hydrology of downstream systems (environmental being captured is being dispersed over the site by
flows); garden watering thereby returning water to the
AND water table.
O5 S5.1 Not applicable.
Within the Shire Business Centre site, as No solution provided Site is not within the Shire Business Centre.
shown on Map SBC, on-site detention measures
are contained within the developed areas of the
site, clear of drainage lines and Open Space
Precincts.
Managing contamination risk
O6 S6.1 Complies with specific outcome.
Materials used as fill are suitable for development The fill material is solid clean earth, free of Development proposal complies with prescribed
of the land and filling or excavation works do not putrescible or refuse material, vegetation, acid solution. The fill material to be used on the site
result in the contamination of land. sulfate soils, building or construction material or will be solid clean earth, free of putrescible or
other material or contaminants; refuse material, vegetation, acid sulfate soils,
AND building or construction material or contaminants.
S6.2 The site is on the environmental management
The site is not on the contaminated land register. register but as part of the clean up process,
identified arsenic impacted soil, within areas of the
original site, were removed and transferred to an
on-site engineered containment cell located within
Lot 113 SP 186498 (Stage 3 Viridian site). Records
provided to Golder Associates Pty Ltd indicate
that approximately 6000 m³ of material was
transferred to the cell. A protective plastic marker
geotextile, comprising orange fortacon 200 micron,
was laid over the infilled cell. The marker was
Volume II: Code Responses
Viridian Noosa Project
Viridian Stage 3
Water Sensitive Design Code 11 April 2006 Page 133
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Volume 2 - Code ResponsesRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.