Original source · versioned page text
2018-05-14 General Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (10.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 14 MAY 2018
Previous Council Consideration
Nil
Finance & Risk
Council has provisionally allocated a total of $1,750,000 for the project, comprising $130,200 in
the current 2017/18 financial year and $1,619,800 in the draft 5 year capital program.
The allocated funding for the replacement of the Old Noosa Road Bridge is sufficient to complete
the project as per the table below:
Item Cost (excl. GST)
Costs to Date (April 2017) $48,052
Tendered Contract Value $1,232,486
Consultant, superintendent and staff costs $95,000
Qleave, permits $10,000
Relocation of services (Telstra) $10,000
Subtotal $1,395,538
Contingency (10% on tendered contract value) $123,248
Total project cost $1,518,786
Included within the project budget is $875,000 grant funding received from the Federal
Government Bridge Renewal Program Round 3. Funding was also received for the replacement
of the Mary River Road and Orealla Road bridge replacements.
Overall funding received for the three bridges is currently being discussed with Federal and State
Government representatives with the aim of smoothing project costs within the total grant funding
pool received, given changes in the cost mix between the bridges since the original grants
applications were submitted.
Risks & Opportunities
FINANCE RISKS MITIGATION
Project scope increases. This is to be mitigated through Project Control Group and
Capital Works Executive management and limitation of client
requested scope variations.
Community requests for scope Council acceptance of scope as awarded with intention of not
changes once construction increasing scope.
commences and project becomes
publically visible.
Geotechnical conditions give rise for A thorough Geotechnical investigation has been completed by
contractor claiming variation costs. Council and the report provided as part of the tender
documentation. As such the risk of variation to the piling
activity has been reduced as much as possible.
Contractor claims for variations based This has been mitigated through the lump sum procurement
on changes required for design. method with further mitigation through post tender
clarifications tying the contractor firmly into the agreed scope
of works.
Page 14 of 74
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.