Council archive · source document
Meeting papers
Very large file (21.8 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 80, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Document Set ID: 23711366
Page 80 of 182
Version: 1, Version Date: 30/04/2025
Statutory Framework
9 Section 65 of the PA provides the relevant test for conditions imposed ona
development approval:
65 Permitted development conditions
(1) A development condition imposed on a development approval must—
(a) be relevant to, but not be an unreasonable imposition on, the
development or the use of premises as a consequence of the development; or
(b) be reasonably required in relation to the development or the use of
premises as a consequence of the development.
Grounds of Appeal
Conditions 3, 28, 30, 39, 43, 59, 61 — 64 (Waste Collection )
10 The Waste Collection Impugned Conditions are not reasonable, and so far as they may
be relevant, are an unreasonable imposition on the Development and are not required
as a consequence of the Development because:
(a) | the Development can be safely serviced by the on-street collection of waste;
(b) on-site collection of waste is not required to comply with any relevant code;
(c) the Respondent directed the Appellant to off-site collection of waste in an
earlier application as a preference and the Appellant designed the Development
on that basis;
(d) the collection of waste by other premises in the locality occurs off-site;
(e) the collection of waste off-site will occur as part of the usual waste collection in
the area and its impact on amenity will be consistent with the existing amenity
in the area; and
(f) the Easement is constrained such that Refuse Service Vehicles cannot use it as
there is insufficient clearance with existing structures.
11 The Waste Collection Impugned Conditions are not final or certain as:
(a) they require the gaining of permission to vary the terms and conditions of the
Easement;
(b) the making of an operational works application over property that is not the
subject of the Development; and
we Roy c) compliance with standard drawings for vehicle crossover for a new easement
S by over the Easement including requiring the removal of a structure.
=( @@ )2
<=
a\ ee 2
“Z Ak
Yarooos' 7
4
Document Set ID: 23711366
Version: 1, Version Date: 30/04/2025 Page 80 of 182See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.