Council archive · source document
Meeting papers
Very large file (21.8 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 81, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Document Set ID: 23711366
Page 81 of 182
Version: 1, Version Date: 30/04/2025
12 The Waste Collection Impugned Conditions should be amended or deleted to allow
the Development to proceed in accordance with the Development and allow off-site
waste collection.
Condition 3 (Pool amenity)
13 Condition 3 requires the Development to be generally in accordance with the
approved plans and seeks to amend plans:
i. CD 3.01 B Rev. B Elevation 01-Gympie Tce / North prepared by Arkos
Architects dated 26.02.2025; and
ii. CD 3.02 B Rev. B Elevation 02 — Thomas Street / West prepared by
Arkos Architects dated 26.02.2025
by requiring “any splash back around the pool... to be constructed from clear glazing or
similar” and “walls located between the terrace areas... to be removea”.
14 Condition 3 is not reasonable, and so far as it may be relevant, is an unreasonable
imposition on the Development and is not required as a consequence of the
Development because:
(a) Gympie Terrace and Thomas Streets have significant pedestrian traffic;
(b) there will be an unreasonable lack of privacy of pool users if the walls located
between the terrace areas were to be removed and clear glazing installed;
(c) the built form of the Development maintains an appropriate amenity for the
area; and
(d) the proposed amendments to the built form is not mandated to comply with
any relevant code.
15 The proposed amendments to Condition 3 should be deleted.
Condition 13 (Internal design)
16 Condition 13 requires submission of plans for internal design of the approved units to
be submitted to the Respondent for a “further approval” prior to the issue of any
building approval.
17 Condition 13 is not reasonable, and so far as it may be relevant, is an unreasonable
imposition on the Development and is not required as a consequence of the
Development because:
(a) | the Respondent has given its approval for the Development subject to Condition
3 that requires it proceed generally in accordance with the approved drawings;
(b) the approved drawings provide sufficient detail;
Qo ENVIRO . .
ee GNX) the internal design of the units is not a matter that requires any further
FE , 2 consideration other than obtaining a building approval; and
=| €@ )s
oS td there are unnecessary delays and costs to the Development.
‘' &
Larose
5
Document Set ID: 23711366
Version: 1, Version Date: 30/04/2025 Page 81 of 182See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.