Meeting papers

Document Set ID: 23711366
                                       Page 83 of 182
Version: 1, Version Date: 30/04/2025

28    Condition 21 should be deleted.
                Condition 22 (Compliance with Local Law)
                 29.   Condition 22 requires compliance with a local law about short-term accommodation.
                 30    Condition 22 is not reasonable, and so far as it may be relevant, is an unreasonable
                       imposition on the Development and is not required as a consequence of the
                       Development because:
                       (a)   compliance with a local law is not a matter for a planning approval;
                       (b)   the local law has its own compliance requirements,
                       (c)   the local law may be changed or repealed; and
                       (d)   the Development is not limited to short-term accommodation and the local law
                             has no application to the commercial tenancies of the Development.
                 31    Condition 22 should be deleted.
                 Condition 23 (Service vehicle hours of operation)
                 32    Condition 23 limits service vehicles times of operation.
                 33    Condition 23 is not reasonable, and so far as it may be relevant, is an unreasonable
                       imposition on the Development and is not required as a consequence of the
                       Development because:
                       (a)   the services to be provided will occur 7 days a week;
                       (b)   the ability of service providers to attend within the hours of operation set by
                             the condition is too restrictive;
                       (c)   service vehicles will attend outside of the hours set by the condition; and
                        (d)   amenity is to be protected by Condition 20, with the amendment proposed by
                              the Appellant in paragraph 25 above to reflect that the use must not
                              “unreasonably detrimentally” affect the residential amenity of the surrounding
                              residents.
                  34    Condition 23 should be deleted.
                  Conditions 35 d and e, 37 d and e and 40 (Car parking)
                  35.   Conditions 35 d and e, 37 d and e and 40 provide for on site and off site car parking
                        and motorcycle spaces and seek the provision of parking spaces in excess of the
                        requirements for the development and in excess of provisions of the relevant code in
      aS     ions       relation to the number of parking spaces to be provided.
     =           S
    =>            Zs
    =    ge             Conditions 35 d and e, 37 dand e and 40 are not reasonable, and so far as they may
   =,     —        s]   be relevant, are an unreasonable imposition on the Development and are not required
     oe         Ku)     as a consequence of the Development because:
       4,       SS
       ARooe wey
                                                                                                         7
Document Set ID: 23711366
Version: 1, Version Date: 30/04/2025                                                                     Page 83 of 182