Original source · versioned page text
2 David Low Way - Town Planning Report - Urban Systems Pty Ltd
Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguration of a Lot (1 lot into 6) - RAL17/0501.
Original PDF page 64, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Table 17—Specific outcomes and probable solutions for the detached housing zone
Specific outcome Probable solution Applicant response
d) that are visible from, but do not
face the street, include windows or
other articulation and have a 6m
landscaped buffer between the
structure and the road frontage.
3. SPECIFIC OUTCOMES AND PROBABLE SOLUTIONS FOR THE RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE
Table 18—Specific outcomes and probable solutions for the reconfiguring a lot code
Specific outcome Probable solution Applicant response
14.183 Lot size and dimensions
O1 Lots have the appropriate S1.1 If for reconfiguration other Complies with probable solution.
area37 and dimensions to provide than community title subdivision, Each lot has a minimum area of
for— Council will require the following— 600m² and a minimum average
a) the intended use and, if not a) Minimum lot area and minimum width of 17 metres.
intended to be used by the Council average width consistent with the
or State for community relevant provisions of Table 14-68;
infrastructure, conservation and
purposes or public utilities b) If for residential development—
including road widening are not i) the minimum house site area is
less than the minimum sizes not less than that specified in
specified in Table 14-68; and Table 14-69; and
b) if for residential development— ii) if not in a sewerage service area
i) a house site area of not less than an effluent disposal area is
that specified in Table 14-69; and provided.
ii) if not within a sewerage service
area, an effluent disposal area;
c) if for community title subdivision,
the minimum lot sizes for the
intended use are not less than
identified for the relevant zone
specified in Table 14-68;
d) siting and construction of
buildings to minimise risk of soil
erosion, landslide, flooding and
bushfire;
e) siting and construction of
buildings to minimise detrimental
impacts of effluent disposal and
water quality impacts;
f) retention of natural
environmental values, including
native vegetation;
g) retention of cultural features and
protect views to cultural features;
h) minimisation of earthworks or
retaining walls associated with
building construction on sloping
sites;
i) private and public open space
and on-site landscaped areas; and
ROL, 2 David Low Way Page 40 August, 2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.