Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2 David Low Way - Town Planning Report - Urban Systems Pty Ltd

Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguration of a Lot (1 lot into 6) - RAL17/0501.

of 107

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Original PDF page 66, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

 Table 18—Specific outcomes and probable solutions for the reconfiguring a lot code
 Specific outcome                      Probable solution                    Applicant response
 volumes that are safe and             Standards – Roads, Drainage and
 appropriate to that function;         Earthworks;
 b) provides a high level of internal  AND
 accessibility both within the site    S7.2 Road and pathway planning
 and to external sites and             and design is in accordance with,
 appropriate external connections      in order of precedence—
 for vehicles, pedestrian and cycle    a) Noosa Integrated Local
 movements;                            Transport Plan;
 c) deters through-traffic from        b) Queensland Transport’s
 residential areas and creates safe    Shaping Up
 conditions for local road users,      c) Queensland Design Code for
 pedestrians and cyclists;             Residential Streets;
 d) incorporates street junctions and d) AUSTROADS Guide to Traffic
 access to lots that are located and Engineering Practice;
 spaced to facilitate safe and         e) Sections 2 and 3 of PSP5
 convenient vehicle movements;         Engineering Design Standards-
 e) provides for street widths and     Roads, Drainage and Earthworks;
 lengths that optimise the cost        f) The Noosa Cycling and Walking
 effectiveness of the network and      Network Development Plan; or
 the provision of public utilities;    g) A combination of the principles
 f) provides for road reserve widths in these documents;
 not less than the minimum             AND
 identified Section 2.3 of PSP5        S7.3 The achievement of multiple
 Engineering Design Standards –        connections for all roads and
 Roads, Drainage and Earthworks;       streets (excluding cul-de-sacs)
 g) minimises the extent of            within the subdivision and to
 earthworks required by being          adjoining subdivisions;
 sympathetic to the terrain;           AND
 h) has no significant adverse         S7.4 Road networks provide
 effects on habitat corridors or       connectivity between residential
 areas of significant native           areas, both internally and to
 vegetation;                           adjoining sites, using access roads
 i) does not create noise attenuation AND
 difficulties;                         S7.5 The length of a cul-de-sac
 j) incorporates pedestrian and        does not exceed 200m in urban
 cyclist crossings at intersections or areas and 500m in rural areas;
 where required to access high         AND
 activity nodes and public transport; S7.6 The layout uses street and
 k) has regard to the potential for    road design, including variations in
 conflict between vehicles,            carriageway width, as a traffic
 pedestrians and cyclists; and         calming measure to encourage
 l) incorporates on-road cycling       lower traffic speeds. (Note:
 facilities.                           Carriageway widths are identified
                                       in Section 2.3 of PSP5 Engineering
                                       Design Standards – Roads,
                                       Drainage and Earthworks.)
                                       AND
                                       S7.7 On-road cycling treatment is
                                       utilised to provide safe and
                                       continuous movement of cyclists
                                       along a roadway such as--
                                       a) sealed shoulders;
ROL, 2 David Low Way                             Page 42                                         August, 2017
Log in to download the original file

2 David Low Way - Town Planning Report - Urban Systems Pty Ltd.pdf · 6.2 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.