Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 172, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Specific Outcome Probable Solution Response
S2.6 Appropriate width of road and verge is provided to allow R2.6 Complies
streets to perform their designated functions in the street The proposed road layout conforms to industry standard road
network; hierarchy function including acceptable facilities for private car,
AND public transport, cyclists and pedestrians.
Refer to Appendix D – Traffic Impact Assessment.
S2.7 A network of local streets focused towards an activity centre R2.7 Complies
or school is provided for safe and efficient pedestrian and Pedestrian and bike access to the site and the proposed
bike access to the school, safe conditions for school buses, development has been designed to be safe and efficient. On-site
set down facilities, with on-site parking where practical; parking is provided at-grade and in an undercroft.
AND Refer to Appendix D – Traffic Impact Assessment.
S2.8 Passive surveillance is maximised by designing streets to R2.8 Not Applicable
enable development to front all streets and roads, including The road layout is informed by the specific provisions applying to the
arterials; SBC.
AND
S2.9 Streets near Public Passenger Transport facilities are R2.9 Not Applicable
orientated to optimise the walkable catchments within 800 The proposed development does not alter the existing bus stop
metres walking distance; facility.
AND
S2.10 The street network has no more than 15 percent of lots R2.10 Not Applicable
fronting cul-de-sacs. The maximum cul-de-sac length is 120
m;
AND
S2.11 Street stubs to adjacent future development areas are R2.11 Not Applicable
provided at spacings of 200m or closer to enable future street
connections to be made;
AND
S2.12 Street block lengths are not more than 240 m long, and R2.12 Not Applicable
predominantly around 150-180 m long. Street block lengths The road layout is informed by the specific provisions applying to the
are generally shorter closer to town and neighbourhood SBC.
centres;
AND
S2.13 Direct, safe and attractive pedestrian and cycle routes are R2.13 Complies
provided within and through the development and connect to Refer to Appendix D – Traffic Impact Assessment.
bus stops.
O3 Development is designed – S3.1 Higher density development is concentrated along public R3.1 Not Applicable
a) To encourage travel by community transport routes; The proposal does not involve higher density development.
transport, walking and cycling rather than by AND
private car; and
S3.2 There is provision for bus routes through development sites; R3.2 Complies
December 2014 Cardno HRP A91
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.