Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 174, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Specific Outcome Probable Solution Response
Bus routes currently operate through the site to an existing bus stop.
These arrangements are retained as part of the expansion.
Refer to Appendix D – Traffic Impact Assessment.
S3.12 Facilities for boarding and exiting community transport R3.12 Complies
facilities are incorporated into developments; Bus routes currently operate through the site to an existing bus stop.
AND These arrangements are retained as part of the expansion. The
proposed expansion is designed to provide a high level of pedestrian
accessibility to this stop.
Refer to Appendix B – Architectural Drawings and Architectural
Design Report.
S3.13 Pedestrian and cycle routes within or adjacent to the R3.13 Complies
development are overlooked by adjoining buildings, make use Surveillance of key pedestrian and cycle routes is promoted through
of views and attractive sights, have lighting and are building design where practical.
signposted;
AND
S3.14 Suitable car restraint measures are adopted within the R3.14 Will Comply
development such as lower speed limits or traffic calming
measures to support greater pedestrian and cycle movement;
AND
S3.15 Traffic management devices on potential bus routes are R3.15 Not Applicable
provided in accordance with the Self-assessable code for The proposed development does not involve the construction of
undertaking road works on local government roads, under the potential bus routes.
Transport Planning and Coordination Regulation 2005;
AND
S3.16 Streets identified as potential bus routes are— R3.16 Not Applicable
a) collector streets and sub-arterial/arterial roads which The proposed development does not involve the construction of
provide highly accessible and relatively direct routes potential bus routes.
wherever practical;
b) those that provide for the shortest and most direct route for
an efficient public transport service; and
c) those that can efficiently service adjoining development
areas.
O4 Development access does not compromise No solution provided. R4 Alternative Solution (as no Probable Solution is available)
the functions of particular roads as indicated Section 5.0 of Appendix D – Traffic Impact Assessment discusses
in the road hierarchy, and does not the impact of development traffic on the road network.
adversely impact on the safety, capacity
and operations of the road system.
14.146 Pedestrian and Cycle Path Infrastructure
December 2014 Cardno HRP A93
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.