Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 197, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Response
PO12 Further development of artificial waterways AO12.1 The design, construction and operation of artificial tidal waterways R12 Not Applicable
avoids or minimises adverse impacts on coastal maintains the tidal prism volume of the natural waterway to which it is The proposed development does not artificial waterways.
resources and their values, and does not contribute to: connected.
(1) an increase in the risk of flooding or erosion AND
(2) degradation of water quality AO12.2 The design, construction and operation of artificial tidal waterways
(3) degradation and loss of matters of state does not increase risk from flooding.
environmental significance (including, but not AND
limited to, coastal wetlands, fish habitat areas
and migratory species habitat). AO12.3 The design, construction and operation of an artificial waterway in
connection with the reconfiguration of a lot ensures:
(1) water inlet and outlets structures are of sufficient capacity to maintain
the water quality within the waterway
(2) water discharged from the artificial waterway protects the
environmental values and water quality objectives of the receiving
waters
(3) dredged material is not disposed of to tidal water beyond the artificial
waterway unless there is a beneficial reuse, e.g. beach nourishment.
Editor’s note: For more information on environmental values and water
quality objectives see Schedule 1 of the Environment Protection (Water)
Policy 2009.
AND
AO12.4 The location of the artificial waterways avoids matters of state
environmental significance, or does not result in any significant adverse
impact on matters of state environmental significance.
PO13 Development does not involve reclamation of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. R13 Alternative Outcome (as no Acceptable Outcome is
land below tidal water, other than for the purposes of: prescribed)
(1) coastal-dependent development, public marine No development is proposed involving reclamation of land below
development or community infrastructure tidal waters.
(2) strategic ports, boat harbours or strategic airports
and aviation facilities, in accordance with a
statutory land use plan, where there is a
demonstrated net benefit for the state or region
and no feasible alternative exists
(3) coastal protection work or work necessary to
protect coastal resources or physical coastal
processes.
December 2014 Cardno HRP A116
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.