MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance

                                                                                                                                                                                        Town Planning Report
                                                                                                         28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive



 Performance Outcomes                                       Acceptable Outcomes                                                             Response
                                                            Editor’s note: A Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ)
                                                            certified barrier design complies with this acceptable outcome.
 PO3 Buildings and structures in, over or below a           AO3.1 Buildings and structures, including piers or supporting elements,         R3 Not Applicable
 railway or future railway land are able to sustain         located in, over or below a railway or future railway land are designed and     The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
 impacts to their structural integrity in the event of an   constructed in accordance with AS5100 Bridge design, AS 1170 Structural         railway or future railway land.
 impact from a derailed train.                              design actions and Civil Engineering Technical Requirement CIVIL-SR-012
                                                            Collision protection of supporting elements adjacent to railways,
                                                            Queensland Rail, 2011.
                                                            Editor’s note: Part A.9 – Collision protection of the Guide for development
                                                            in a railway environment, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, 2010,
                                                            provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome.
 PO4 Buildings and structures in, over, below or within     AO4.1 Development in, over, below or within 50 metres of a state-               R4 Not Applicable
 50 metres of a state-controlled transport tunnel or a      controlled transport tunnel or future state-controlled transport tunnel         The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
 future state-controlled transport tunnel have no           ensures that the tunnel is:                                                     state-controlled transport tunnel or a future state-controlled transport
 adverse impact on the structural integrity of the state-   (1)   not vertically overloaded or affected by the addition or removal of       tunnel.
 controlled transport tunnel.                                     lateral pressures
                                                            (2)   not adversely affected as a result of directly or indirectly disturbing
                                                                  groundwater or soil.

                                                            Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome, it
                                                            is recommended that a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland
                                                            (RPEQ) certified geotechnical assessment, groundwater assessment and
                                                            structural engineering assessment be prepared and submitted with the
                                                            application.
 PO5 Development involving dangerous goods                  AO5.1 Development involving dangerous goods, other than hazardous               R5 Not Applicable
 adjacent to a railway or future railway land does not      chemicals below the threshold quantities listed in table 5.2 of the State       The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
 adversely impact on the safety of a railway.               Planning Policy guideline: State interest – emissions and hazardous             railway or future railway land.
                                                            activities, Guidance on development involving hazardous chemicals,
                                                            Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, 2013,
                                                            ensures that impacts on a railway from a fire, explosion, spill, gas emission
                                                            or dangerous goods incident can be appropriately mitigated.
                                                            Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome, it
                                                            is recommended that a risk assessment be undertaken in accordance with
                                                            Attachment 1: Risk assessment guide of the Guide for development in a
                                                            railway environment, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, 2010.
 PO6 Any part of the development located within 25          AO6.1 Advertising devices proposed to be located within 25 metres of a          R6 Not Applicable
 metres of a state-controlled road or future state-         state-controlled road or future state-controlled road are designed to meet      The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a state
 controlled road minimises the potential to distract        the relevant standards for advertising outside the boundaries of, but visible   controlled road or future state controlled road.
 drivers and cause a safety hazard.                         from, a state-controlled road, outlined within the Roadside advertising
                                                            guide, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
 PO7 Filling, excavation and construction does not          AO7.1 Filling and excavation does not undermine, cause subsidence of, or        R7.1 Complies
 adversely impact on or compromise the safety or            groundwater seepage onto a state transport corridor or future state
 operation of:                                              transport corridor.



December 2014                                                                                   Cardno HRP                                                                                            A124