MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance

                                                                                                                                                                                      Town Planning Report
                                                                                                       28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive



 Performance Outcomes                                      Acceptable Outcomes                                                               Response
 (1)   state transport corridors,                          Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome for         The site is not within the vicinity of a state transport corridors or
 (2)   future state transport corridors,                   a state-controlled road, it is recommended that a filling and excavation          future state transport corridors. State transport infrastructure will be
                                                           report assessing the proposed filling and excavation be prepared in               unaffected by the proposed development.
 (3)   state transport infrastructure.                     accordance with the requirements of the Road planning and design
                                                           manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
                                                           Editor’s note: If a development involves filling and excavation within a
                                                           state-controlled road, an approval issued by the Department of Transport
                                                           and Main Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994
                                                           may be required.
                                                           AND
                                                           AO7.2 Development within 25 metres of a railway or public passenger               R7.2 Not Applicable
                                                           transport corridor and involving excavation, boring, piling or blasting does      The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
                                                           not result in vibration impacts during construction or blasting which would       railway or public passenger transport corridor.
                                                           compromise the safety and operational integrity of the railway or public
                                                           passenger transport corridor.
                                                           Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome it
                                                           is recommended that an RPEQ certified geotechnical report be prepared
                                                           and submitted with the application.
                                                           Editor’s note: Development within 25 metres of a railway or public
                                                           passenger transport corridor may require an RPEQ certified vibration
                                                           monitoring plan for the construction phase of development as a condition
                                                           of approval.
 PO8 Filling and excavation does not interfere with or     AO8.1 Any alternative service and public utility alignment must satisfy the       R8 Not Applicable
 impact on existing or future planned services or public   standards and design specifications of the service or public utility provider,    The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a state
 utilities on a state-controlled road.                     and any costs of relocation are borne by the developer.                           controlled road
                                                           Editor’s note: An approval issued by the Department of Transport and Main
                                                           Roads under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 may be
                                                           required.
 PO9 Retaining or reinforced soil structures required to   AO9.1 Retaining or reinforced soil structures (including footings, rock           R9.1 Not Applicable
 contain fill and excavation:                              anchors and soil nails) are not located in a state transport corridor or future   The proposed development is not located within the vicinity a state
 (1)   do not encroach on a state transport corridor       state transport corridor.                                                         transport corridor or future state transport corridor.
 (2)   are capable of being constructed and maintained     AND
       without adversely impacting a state transport       AO9.2 Retaining or reinforced soil structures in excess of an overall height      R9.2 Not Applicable
       corridor                                            of one metre abutting a state transport corridor are to be designed and           The proposed development is not located within the vicinity a state
 (3)   are constructed of durable materials which          certified by a structural RPEQ.                                                   transport corridor or future state transport corridor.
       maximise the life of the structure.                 Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable outcome a
                                                           RPEQ report should demonstrate that the works will not destabilise state
                                                           transport infrastructure or the land supporting this infrastructure.
                                                           AND
                                                           AO9.3 Retaining or reinforced soil structures that are set back less than         R9.3 Not Applicable
                                                           750 millimetres from a common boundary with a state-controlled road are           The proposed development is not located within the vicinity a state
                                                                                                                                             controlled road.



December 2014                                                                                 Cardno HRP                                                                                               A125