MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance

                                                                                                                                                                                   Town Planning Report
                                                                                                    28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive



 Specific Outcome                                             Probable Solution                                                     Response
 Lake Entrance Boulevard
 O5        There is no increase in the number of lots                  No solution provided                                         R5 Alternative Solution (as no Probable Solution is provided)
           that gain access via Lake Entrance                                                                                       The proposed development does not gain access from Lake
           Boulevard.                                                                                                               Entrance Boulevard.
 Airport
 O6        Development and use of premises within                      No solution provided                                         R6 Not Applicable
           750m of the airport do not cause an                                                                                      The proposed development is not located within 750 metres of the
           obstruction or other potential hazard to                                                                                 airport (as depicted in Figure 11.1 of The Noosa Plan).
           aircraft movement associated with the
           airport by the way of—
           a) the physical intrusion of buildings or other
              structures into aircraft take-off and
              approach flight paths;
           b) attracting birds or bats to the area, which
              could cause or contribute to bird-strike
              hazard;
           c) providing very bright lighting or lighting
              similar to runway lighting, which can
              distract or confuse aircraft pilots;
           d) interfering with navigation or
              communication facilities;
           e) emissions that may affect pilot visibility or
              aircraft operations; and
           f) transient intrusions into the airport’s
               operational airspace.
           See Figure 11.1 – Airport traffic area
 11.10 Built Form
 Density
 O7        The density of development within the site                  No solution provided                                         R7 Alternative Solution (as no Probable Solution is provided)
           area—                                                                                                                    The proposal does not involve residential development.
           a) is compatible with surrounding                                                                                        The proposed development incorporates a density which is
              development; and                                                                                                      compatible and consistent with the scale and intensity of
           b) does not exceed—                                                                                                      development in the surrounding area, including the existing Noosa
             i. for the Semi-Attached Housing Zone:                                                                                 Civic.
                  A. for sites between 500m2 and                                                                                    The proposal retains native vegetation on-site where possible in
                    599m2 inclusive—4.8 persons;                                                                                    order to screen the proposed built form to improve the visual amenity
                                                                                                                                    of the locality and maintain the existing character of the area.
                  B. for sites 600m2 or more — 6.6
                    persons or 100 persons per hectare                                                                              The proposal has also been designed to utilise the landform of the
                    whichever is the higher;                                                                                        site to enable the creation of undercroft car parking, with the main
                                                                                                                                    retail level at grade at the main entrance.



December 2014                                                                                 Cardno HRP                                                                                         A2