Original source · versioned page text
2014-12-09 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (13.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 DECEMBER 2014
Issues Comments
Detached houses are inconsistent within the Despite detached housing being inconsistent with the
zone. Community Services zone, it is considered there are
sufficient grounds to approve the development.
The site is listed as High Value Bushland for The site is not mapped within a ‘Koala Assessable
koalas. Development Area’ by the SEQ Koala State Planning
Regulatory Provisions.
The Noosa Plan’s Biodiversity overlay also does not
map the site as being a Koala Habitat Areas.
Blue Wren Place is not constructed to a Blue Wren Place is constructed to a Local Access
standard able to cater for the increased standard, which is considered suitable to cater for the
number of houses. There is also no overflow proposed development. Conditions are also
parking available in Blue Wren Place and this recommended for the developer to provide for indented
development will make the existing traffic parking bays within the existing road reserve of Blue
problems worse. Wren Place.
The new road accessing Elm Street is not The new road reserve area is 5m wide in size and is
consistent with the concurrence agency proposed for pedestrian access only. This is consistent
response. with the Department of Transport and Main Roads
concurrence agency conditions restricting vehicular
access to Elm Street.
Inadequate active recreational areas provided As part of the adjacent subdivision design, 685m 2 of
on the site. active parkland is proposed to be built by the developer.
This is located less than 100m from the subject site.
Noise barriers along Elm Street will not work. Renzo Tonin Ron Rumble Acoustic Consultants have
undertaken a Rail and Traffic Noise Study for the
proposed subdivision design. Modelling within the study
finds that a series of 2.3m-2.5m high fences along the
Elm St frontage will reduce the traffic noise below
60dBA for all lowset houses within the development.
As part of the Queensland Development Codes (QDC)
MP 4.4 – Building in a Transport Corridor any new
building work will need to achieve compliance with the
code and will be assessed as part of the building
certification process.
Potential flood impacts on the adjoining creek The proposed bioretention and detention basins will
and associated water surge problems result in no additional flows from the site.
downstream.
Potential scouring impacts on 2 Pearsons Conditions are recommended for all elements of the
Road as a result of the development. stormwater drainage system, including any necessary
scour protection, to be wholly contained within the
subject site.
Page 76 of 134
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.