Original source · versioned page text
2020-10-12 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 OCTOBER 2020
to and from the Sunshine Coast Airport and people living underneath those flight paths will
be impacted. The question is - what are the flight paths that have the least impact but are
also safe?
Secondly, during the COVID-19 period, although the airport has been open, there have not
been as many flights as normal. Even so, there have been quite a number of complaints
lodged by Noosa residents with the Sunshine Coast Airport and ASA about noise impacts of
flights. These include complaints from areas where there was no expectation that there would
be flights/noise impacts.
Thirdly, flight path design is a complex issue. Obviously, safety is paramount and must be
taken into account as the primary design element. Nevertheless, there are a range of other
variables which can impact upon flight paths including topography, efficiency of routes
(shortest path), environmental constraints, other regulated airspace etc.
Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting Minutes, 16 May 2019, Item 1, Page 13
That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Ordinary Meeting dated 16
May 2019 in relation to the proposed flight path changes for the Sunshine Coast Airport and:
A. Note the update from the Chief Executive Officer on actions taken as a result of the
Council decision in April 2019 on this issue; and
B. Support the Statement of Intent proposed by Flight Path Forum Inc. as set out in
Attachment 1 to the report and request the Chief Executive Officer to take the
necessary action to pursue that outcome including making submissions to Airservices
Australia and the Aircraft Noise Ombudsman.
Ordinary Meeting Minutes, 18 April 2019, Item 1, Page 15
That Council note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the Ordinary Meeting dated 18
April 2019 and request the Chief Executive Officer to make a submission in relation to the
proposed changes to flight paths for the Sunshine Coast Airport with such submission:
A. To focus on the establishment of a curfew similar to Gold Coast Airport (enforced by
legislation) to minimise the impact of noise from flights on the amenity of residents in
order to protect and maintain the Noosa lifestyle and environment;
B. To request from Airservices Australia a detailed explanation as to why the intensity of
flight numbers over the coastal flight path versus hinterland flight path has changed;
C. To request Airservices Australia to extend their community consultation process by 1
month to provide more time for Noosa residents to lodge submissions in relation to the
proposal;
D. Request Sunshine Coast Regional Council to conduct an independent EIS for Lake
Weyba, plus Noosa National Park and the coastal dunes within the Castaways and
Marcus Beach area;
E. And request Federal Members Llew O’Brien and Ted O’Brien to support Council’s
position on this matter.
Finance
It is proposed to contribute $5,000 to Flight Path Forum Inc towards the cost of engaging an
independent flight path consultant to develop a number of alternatives to the current flight
path so that those alternatives can be considered by ASA via the post-implementation review
process. This will be funded from the existing budget in the CEO’s office for consulting
services.
Page 83 of 84
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.