Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix 5 - Code Table Assessment

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0061 Development Application - Appendix 4, 5, 6 & 7 Email 2 of 2.

of 24

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Specific outcomes               Probable solutions   Compliance
                                                     noise from the ongoing
                                                     operation of air conditioning
                                                     equipment associated with
                                                     the outdoor cabinets, once
                                                     installed. Noise emanating
                                                     from the air conditioning
                                                     equipment is at a comparable
                                                     level to a domestic air
                                                     conditioning installation, and
                                                     will generally accord with the
                                                     background noise levels
                                                     prescribed by Australian
                                                     Standard AS1055. The air
                                                     conditioning unit will be well
                                                     removed from surrounding
                                                     residential dwellings.
Environment & heritage No solution provided          O37 - Complies.
values                                               The proposal is appropriately
O37 There are no significant                         located within a rural area
adverse effects on the                               used for a mix of agricultural
biodiversity,           natural                      and residential purposes. In
vegetation, native wildlife,                         addition, the proposed facility
habitats, landscape quality,                         has been set back from
water quality or heritage                            environmentally       sensitive
values, including those related                      areas to avoid areas of
to—                                                  significant natural resources
a)     changes     to   natural                      and      minimise     potential
drainage;                                            environmental          impacts
b) disturbance to any of the                         associated       with      the
wetland systems;                                     development.
c) management of landslide
and fire risk;                                       The proposed facility will be
d) erosion and the transport                         located away from wetland
of sediments offsite;                                systems and will unlikely
e) unmanaged public access;                          impact on the natural
f) effluent disposal;                                drainage or cause erosion of
g) changes to fauna habitat                          the land. Whilst it is
and behaviour; and                                   acknowledged        vegetation
h) disturbance of buildings                          clearing is required to
and features, including natural                      establish    the     proposed
features,       of     heritage                      facility, due diligence and
significance.                                        care has been taken to
                                                     ensure only least concern
                                                     vegetation is required to be
                                                     cleared. Specifically Aurecon
                                                     ecologists undertook a flora
                                                     and fauna survey within a 100
                                                     m buffer of the proposed
                                                     clearing and found that no


NBN-4BBZ-4GYM-5125 – David Cootharaba                                 Page 83
Log in to download the original file

Appendix 5 - Code Table Assessment.pdf · 311 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.