Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

ECM_16693990_v1_APPROVED Change to Existing Approval 152005 220 01

Attached to the e-mail 132005.220.04 Request a Change Existing Approval.

of 19

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                    152005.220.01

Tribunal, and the Minister administering the ACH Act can also issue stop orders for an activity
that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of
Aboriginal cultural heritage.
You should contact the Cultural Heritage Co-ordination Unit on 07 3238 3838 to discuss any
obligations under the ACH Act.

8    PROPERTY NOTES

Not Applicable

9    PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OVERRIDING PLANNING SCHEME

A preliminary approval under section 3.1.6 of Integrated Planning Act 1997 has been granted
and as such the level of assessment and applicable codes for any development approval
resulting from this approval are identified in the conditions.

10 FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED

 Type of Development Permit required Subject of the required Development Permit
 Development Permit for Operational           Landscaping, car parking and access, frontage
 Works                                        works, stormwater drainage and filling of the site
 Development Permit for Material              Industrial Business – Types 1 and 2
 Change of Use
 Development Permit for Building Works        All Building Works

11 SELF ASSESSABLE CODES

Not Applicable

12 SUBMISSIONS

There were 19 properly made submissions about the original application. In accordance with
Integrated Planning Act 1997, the name and address of the principal submitter for each
properly made submission was provided.

13 REASONS / GROUNDS FOR APPROVAL DESPITE CONFLICT WITH SCHEME

1.     It has been demonstrated that the Cooroy locality has a need for industrial land that will
       be of benefit to the local community and surrounding area;
2.     It is not feasible or desirable for the western portion of the site to be developed for
       residential dwellings and home businesses, given the obvious conflict with these types
       of uses; and
3.     The majority of the site is supported for industrial use and given the likely land use
       conflicts, the proposed development is appropriate for the site and provides suitable
       buffers to adjoining uses.

14 RIGHTS OF APPEAL

You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions
from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached.




FM1512s/1-07/04/2010                                                              Page 17 of 19
Log in to download the original file

ECM_16693990_v1_APPROVED Change to Existing Approval 152005 220 01.pdf · 267 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.