Original source · versioned page text
Appendices 6 SMP, 7 Bushfire & 8 Noise impact - Email 3 of 4 - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (13.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: Thomco (No 2087) Pty Ltd Location: 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach 4.3 MUSIC Model Parameters The MUSIC Modelling Guidelines – South East Queensland Version 1.0 (2010) was used to source base and storm flow concentrations and runoff generation. The model was calibrated using the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) data from Nambour, 1989-1998 at a 6-minute time step. This is in accordance with Water by Design’s MUSIC Modelling Guidelines – South East Queensland Version 1.0 (2010). All source nodes were set up in accordance with this guideline, specifically for split catchments. No routing of drainage links was adopted for the purpose of taking a conservative approach. This approach assumes that the flow through the drainage system takes no time, which over estimates the likely pollutant load. MUSIC version 6.2.1 was used for this assessment. 4.4 Land Use/Source Node Areas The proposed development is comprised of short stay units, dual use accommodation apartments, permanent residential dwellings, entrance and access roads and landscaped areas. Each catchment has been divided into three (3) source nodes for MUSIC modelling purposes. These source nodes include treated roof, groundcover and road/hardstand areas (Table 4). Table 4 – MUSIC Source Node Characteristic Catchment Catchment Catchment Source Node A B C Area (ha) Area (ha) Area (ha) Treated Roof 0.123 0.142 0.138 Groundcover 0.051 0.142 0.100 Road 0.123 0.000 0.337 Total 0.297 0.284 0.584 4.5 Pollutant Reduction Results MUSIC modelling of the proposed stormwater treatment strategy for the development was performed to ensure the required load based pollutant load reduction objectives were achieved for the development as a whole. The target reductions in stormwater pollutants are based on a comparison of an unmitigated scenario, having no treatment on site, and the mitigated scenario, which has stormwater treatment measures incorporated onto the site. The results of the overall site MUSIC model can be found in Table 5. Table 5 demonstrates that compliance has been met or exceeded for all of the required pollutant load reduction objectives required by NSC and the SPP (2016). Table 5 – MUSIC Results – Treatment Train Effectiveness for the Overall Site Reduction Target Unmitigated Mitigated Pollutant Achieved Reduction Compliance (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (%) (%) TSS 2610 507 80.6 80 Y TP 4.97 1.4 71.9 60 Y TN 27.1 14.3 47.1 45 Y GP 296 0 100 90 Y Covey Associates Pty Ltd 7 Project No: 162042 Consulting Engineers 100949Rpt Issue A
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.