Council archive · source document
Cover Letter_Precinct F_CDA_FINAL · 132005.1133.7
Attached to the e-mail Change Application - 132005.1133.7 (1 of 6).
Restaurant, Shops & Function Rooms) however, the associated facilities were significantly reduced as part
of the 2016 changes application with the theatre and function rooms components removed. This changes
application also reduced the size of the remaining common facilities including pool with the reference to
resort limited to conditions of approval.
The applicant submits that the approved use is not of a resort with the approved use relating to a multiple
dwelling. The previous and current changes application further reinforces this aspect with a reduction in
the number of one bedroom units and an increase in the number of two and three bedroom units on site.
It is noted also that the Noosa Plan does not seek to limit the site’s use to only a resort, with allowance for
a multiple dwelling on the site. Many of the resorts facilities such as the golf course, club house and spa,
tennis courts as intended by the original plan of development are also located opposite the site under
separate ownership.
The current condition requires the common facilities to be completed and operational as part of the first
stage. The request to change to the 64th unit is considered reasonable and ensures that the facilities will
be constructed almost halfway through the development.
Condition 8
An updated colours and finishes palette has been submitted as part of this change request (refer dwg no. 7038-
DA14 dated 29-09). We therefore request this condition be amended to reflect the amended plan, as follows:-
8 The development’s external colour scheme shall use muted environmental tones of browns, greens and
greys to integrate the development with its landscape setting and ensure the development does not visually
impact on the vegetated skyline. All buildings shall utilise the finishes palette detailed on Plan 7038- DA14
Issue 05 Dated 06.06.2017 06 Dated 29-09-17. The use of paint finish Taubmans Tahira White is to be
minimised.
Condition 33
It is requested that this condition be amended to reflect new car parking numbers triggered by the proposed new
unit mix as reflected on the amended architectural plans. We note that proposed car parking numbers are in
excess of the minimum requirements for both resident and visitor parking under the Noosa Plan, as reflected in
the following table:-
Covered Uncovered TOTAL
Existing approval – existing condition 33 205 56 261
Changes Application – car parking detailed on amended architectural plans 253 92 335
Noosa Plan (July 2017) requirements – based on proposed new unit mix 250 35 285
reflected on amended architectural plans
In addition to the number of carparks triggered for the proposed units identified in the table above, an additional
6 car spaces are also intended to be allocated for staff parking.
Based on the above, there is an overall surplus in car spaces (circa 51 uncovered car spaces) anticipated by the
development, and it is requested that the opportunity be provided that these surplus car spaces be able to be
allocated to individual units by the developer, as exclusive use spaces. This would increase the marketability of
units without adversely impacting upon visitor parking arrangements across the development.
In light of this, it is requested that this condition be amended to read:-
JFP Ref: M2652/F Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Cover Letter_Precinct F_CDA_FINAL.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 846 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.