planning report Krimmer - Change · 132004.240120.3

       ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were made
       when the change application is made would not cause—

              A. the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or

       Response: The change does not include any prohibited development.

              B. referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were no
                 referral agencies for the development application; or

       Response: Although the EPA were an original concurrence agency - No agencies are now
       triggered for referral.

              C. referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or

       Response: The original application was referred to the as a Concurrence Agency. No referral
       agencies are applicable to the current development (no development in front of the coastal
       building line).

              D. a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to, matters
                 prescribed by regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the referral
                 agency must have assessed the application against, or have had regard to, when
                 the application was made; or

       Response: The proposed change would not result in the chief executive having to consider
       matters additional to those considered when the application was made.

              E. public notification if public notification was not required for the development
                 application.

       Response: The change does not require the application to be publicly notified.

Given the above, the proposed change to the existing approval is a minor change in accordance with
Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules.




                                                                                          Page 11 of 15