Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
NATURAL HAZARDS OVERLAY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
fighting appliances (e.g. by avoiding long
narrow lots with long access driveways).
Figure 13.5—House sites in bushfire
hazard
areas
Table 13.10 Flood Hazard areas
13.38 Effects of use and works
Safety and floodplain function N/A Not Applicable
O14 The proposed use does not S14.1 The use does not result in an The site is not identified as being subject to flooding in
compromise the safety of people or increase in the number of persons living, the Flood Hazard Overlay.
property from floods up to and including a working or congregating in Flood Hazard
1% AEP (1:100 year ARI) flood event. Areas identified on Overlay Maps
OM1.3—OM9.3; or
S14.2 At least one access route above N/A Not Applicable
the 1% AEP (1:100 year ARI) flood level The site is not identified as being subject to flooding in
is available for evacuation; or the Flood Hazard Overlay.
S14.3 An area of sufficient size and N/A Not Applicable
dimensions to accommodate users is The site is not identified as being subject to flooding in
provided, above the 1% AEP (1:100 year the Flood Hazard Overlay.
ARI) flood level that allows for safe
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Natural Hazards Overlay Code.docx
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.